Does the public deserve a democratic vote?

Hello, my name is reflective_artic_fox, and in this post I will be discussing whether or not the citizens of America deserve to have a democratic vote (a vote by the public).
There are many reaons why and why not the country of America could vote for the election of their new leader. For one thing, every single person deserves freedom of speech. For another, the public could be slightly biased and believe if it the canditate says that they are not lying in some way when and if they claim that they alone can do the impossible.
Below are some more reasons why the the public should have a democratic vote:
• The public can tell who will treat them better by looking at their history. (The citizens could examine what the runners have done in the past and judge by how they treat people before. However, Biden would be hard to determine as his history is not much known. Trump would be easier as he has already been there for four years. They can just see what he did to them and decide on that basis. Although this happening would not be very common, there s a chance that it might just occur.
Another reason could be that the citizens all would want their own voice heard and rightly so, as the government might just pick whom they favour. All people do deserve at least them to be listened to, and accounted for. Luckily, the public are allowed freedom verbally and mentally to vote for whom they think will do the job best.
These are all reasons why they should have a public vote. The following are all reasons why they should not have a democratic vote:
The vote could cause quarrels and differing opinions upon who will win the election. What's more, people could round on the government instead, and riot. This seems a bit exaggerated, but it could happen. Or they could even break the law! Many people would want their choice to win, but what would happen if it became 50/50! They could allow an odd number to vote, but if they didn't, what would happen? Maybe neither would win. Or both!
They could change their mind right after they had entered, and their opinion would also change. They would disagree with what they put originally and transfer, but it could be too late. if the person they voted for but didn't want to won, they could ignore all the advice given during times like COVID 19. If the advice was good, they could potentially put their lives in danger, and it could result in sinister injury.
In conclusion, I think that the public should have a democratic vote. The reasons against this have little chance of occurring, as they should consider carefully who they are electing for. Every single being on Earth deserves to have freedom of speech and their single voices heard over the midst from others. This includes for elections of prime minister, president and also the Queen/King.
Comments (29)
10 Sep 2020
An interesting post. I have given you a star for problem-solving as you have thought about the pros and cons of different solutions and given clear reasons. In your next session, you'll learn more about the democratic system in America and I would be interested to see you reflect on that in a comment on this post, to show how your ideas have developed.
10 Sep 2020
Ok, thanks for the star!
10 Sep 2020
I really agree with your post. Everyone deserves a voice!
11 Sep 2020
I loved the post it's interesting to see other people's ideas about democracy and how people vote
11 Sep 2020
Hi, reflective_arctic_fox! Thanks for the interesting post. You have touched on the idea of a democratic vote wherein all individuals have an equal vote in choosing the presidential candidate. If America were to enact a popular vote, how do you think the type of leader chosen would differ from past presidents?
Having looked at how the democratic system works, I would say that the president would differ from past presidents as he or she would actually have support from their public, rather than it just being that the most popular country have their support. The electoral college system is very complicated, and is quite difficult to understand. This means that even if you get more public votes, but get less electoral votes, then you lose the election. It also means that popular places like California have more votes than places like Montana, who could be feeling more vulnerable in a way. California has an outsanding 55 electoral votes per person. However, for me, it is unfair as all people should have equal votes and rights. Now that I think of it, the system is just like claiming that someone has more power as they come from a more famous place. If the system was altered so that America were to enact a popular vote, then the president would most likely receive more support than others, unless the other won both votes, the electoral and the majority votes. The type of leader would be what most people want them to be, or at least in a citizen's eyes a better candidate. They would most likely be a good leader and speaker, open-minded and also the Burnet News Club values. The other leaders could just be popular in certain places that are densely crowded, and would not have the full support or the majority of the public. (if they lost both). So therefore, in my opinion, they would both have and not have an advantage over their jobs.
Thank you for reading!
As Montana has much fewer people though, does that make the system fair?
In my opinion, it is not really unfair from their point of view. Since we all get the same votes, it might vary as they do not as all the others. In a way I agree with you, as there are not many people and would only have a small impact on ‘the bigger picture’, yet for them it could be that they moved to a more popular country, as at Montana they feel things are nun just for them. Despite it not having an controversial effect on the President, they should still be able to be listened to, and accounted for.
Thank you!
11 Sep 2020
Thank you!
11 Sep 2020
Thanks
11 Sep 2020
I agree with you reflective_artic _fox. You can not just stop the public from living their life, and in my opinion, anyone who is 18 or over could have a vote. The public also has to vote though, because if nobody could vote, nobody could really get elected to become president. So in the end, I strongly agree with you reflective_artic_fox. Well done!
13 Sep 2020
Well done!
15 Sep 2020
Yes everyone does but I am not sure if the American sitizans would want another male president they might want a woman for a change
15 Sep 2020
I agree the public should always choose because they will be the ones who are led by them overall most of the time the public will choose the right person plus it gives all the population a feeling of power which makes them happy.
That's an interesting point, jolly_olive! Do you think that all of the leaders chosen by the public vote have always been the right person for the job?
15 Sep 2020
I agree with you reflective_arctic_fox I think that I think they should
18 Sep 2020
This is not interesting it reminds me that you can't vote in prison but you can run for president in America! isn't that weird?
Yes I think it is a bit odd and sorry for my comment with its spelling I only mention to say I think once
You don’t have to say sorry!
Oops it shouldn’t have not in it sorry!
19 Sep 2020
Thank u for sending this!
25 Sep 2020
Wow I really do agree with you reflective_artic_fox people of America should have the right to rote for who they won’t to run their country and know who will listen to
25 Sep 2020
Your welcome
30 Sep 2020
I agree everyone should have their own vote because it’s unfair if everyone can’t have their own say
09 Oct 2020
Great job I do think it's unfair
16 Oct 2020
I really agree with your post. Everyone deserves a chance to speed up and share their opinions
19 Oct 2020
I think they should get a vote so it is fair
19 Oct 2020
I really agree with your post. Everyone deserves a chance to speed up and share their opinions
22 Jan 2021
I agree with your post.
You must be logged in with Student Hub access to post a comment. Sign up now!