Can we trust evidence?

evidence is something that proves a point; isn't it?

In my opinion, evidence is not one little thing that could suggest that somebody was murdered, or that he/she commited the crime. In my opinion, evidence is the start of a long chain of evidence that strongly without question tells someone exaactly what happened. No 'if's or 'maybe's, solid and concrete proof.

For example, if the police pick up a lighter at a crime scene, is that proof? I think it is. But not because it possibly belonged to the suspect, because there would be DNA samples on the lighter, which would lead directly to the suspect; but that still wouldn't be evidence; it would be evidence if a witness saw the suspect use and hold that lighter before/after the crime was commited. Even then, the witness could still be lying, so what else could make it solid and concrete evidence? What about CCTV footage, a past photo of the suspect with that lighter... Now that, in my opinion, is evidence.

To conclude, I think "evidence" is a trustworthy source to find out the crime commiter, but only if there is evidence for the evidence. What do you think?

Comments (1)

You must be logged in with Student Hub access to post a comment. Sign up now!