Should voting rights match a person’s legal responsibilities?
This post was written by a student. It has not been fact checked or edited.
On February 12th 2026, the UK government published the Representation of the People Bill. This would mean lowering the voting age from 18 to 16 before the next general election.
The question is: should voting rights match a person’s legal responsibilities? I think that if 16-year-olds are allowed to vote, then there will be mixture of silly and sensible responses. If many people make the wrong decision, it could really affect the country’s wellbeing. It is scientifically proven that your brain only starts fully working at the age of 26 – 18 is actually too young! We could end up with a prime minister that we would not have had if young people were not given the vote, and they could select an untrustworthy party due to lack of knowledge and experience.
Some people disagree with me because they think it is important that young people’s voices are heard, but I think my argument is stronger because the prime minister affects the whole country, therefore it needs to be the right decision. If we have immature 16-year-olds voting, all the citizens of this country will be affected, therefore we should remain with voting at 18 in line with legal responsibilities.
In summary, I think giving 16-year-olds the vote would impact the way campaigns are run to suit immature minds, and in the long term, I do not think it is the best idea.
Comments (0)