Can technology make sports more equal, or does it only widen the gap between competitors?
This post was written by a student. It has not been fact checked or edited.
Hello! I think that technology can both improve fairness in sports and widen the gap between competitors, but most of the times it tends to increase inequality.
Firstly, the new and expensive equipment gives wealtier countries a huge advantage. In Alpine skiing at the Winter Olympics, rich states, like the United States, Norway and Switzerland invest milions on researching and testing custom built skis and aerodynamic suits. Experts will always use lightweight materials for skis, like carbon fiber and titanium layers, which improve the competitors speed and stability. Poorer counties often can't afford all the testing and creating the best equipment possible.
Secondly, new technology directly improves performance. A clear example is the introduction of carving skis in the 1990s. According to four-time world cup gold medalist, Marc Girardelli, modern skis "turn by themselves". He once said: "The biggest change certainly was the carving quantum 'jump' about 25 years ago, the change of skis... Now the ski makes the turn by itself, as long as the skier stays centred on it" , because the new skis allow the racers to maintain higher speeds and greater control. Similarily, in speed skating at the Winter Olympics, the introduction of the 'clap skate' in 1998 led to many world records being broken because it let skaters push off the ice more efficiently.
The third and final reason is that countries with strong sports sciece programs gain extra benefits. High-tech training tools, like motion sensors, video analysis and altitude chambers, help athletes refine their techniques and maximize endurance. States with solid funding systems constantly win more medals, suggesting that acces to technology contributes to long term success.
In conclusion, while technology can improve performance and safety, it widens the competitive gap because richer states can invest more in innovation and training than the poorer ones.
Comments (0)