Does the use of technology make new world records less impressive than those of the past?

It can make fair and unfair decisions because some other people might not know how to play some other sports and some other people use it for cheating and sometimes it makes games fairer for other people in the games. It can be useful but it’s considered cheating.

I think it’s a fair and unfair advantage using technology because it can be considered cheating and it can be useful but if you keep on practicing you’ll get way better than the technology you use in sports. If you keep on doing it, some people might notice that you’ve been using technology and might accuse you of cheating. When you’re not using technology you’ll get way better than before.

Using technology doesn’t help you directly in sports but they can help people become more skilled. By training, it can help by improving and doing better in each game. These tools have chances to make fans to see clearly to the athletes performing and it makes the competition way more fair for the fans so they can see the athletes properly.

The equipment depends on the the money because technology is expensive and some countries cannot afford the expensive technology. Even though they sensors help fairness , some equipment is expensive but some modern specialised shoes in Curling for example makes it quick an easier to sweep and glide, which could be unfair to countries that do not have the money to buy this equipment.