Should modern sport test not just natural talent, but also training methods and technology, or does that make competition unfair?
This post was written by a student. It has not been fact checked or edited.
In sport, success can sometimes be bought through expensive technology. This can make the spirit of winning feel lost.
I think that modern technology can affect winning, but some people may prefer to win without technology. For example, if one football team has much better technology and equipment than another team, it could increase their chances of winning, which would be unfair.
Someone who disagrees might think it is fair for one team to have more technology than another team.
However, I think that would be wrong because technology could even influence referees or decisions.
Some people would say teams are just wasting money on something that could make the game unfair, and I agree with that idea.
In conclusion, some technology is unfair to teams that do not have it. As long as technology does not give one team a big advantage, then it should be acceptable.
Comments (0)