Is it safer for a country to have many different allies or to rely on one very powerful relationship?
This post was written by a student. It has not been fact checked or edited.
Is it better for a country to have one powerful ally or lots of allies?
I believe that it is more logical and makes more sense to have lots of allies’ contrast to just one. For instance, if you had just one strong ally versus lots, the one country could be surrounded and destroyed, but if the alliance was to be attacked, it wouldn’t take much to defend as one country cannot fight on many different fronts. Another reason why I believe it is better to have many allies is because if one falls, you still have many more, whereas, if you had one strong ally and it fell you would not have any protection, meaning if you were to be attacked, you would fall without much of a fight. My final reason to believe why should have many allies is because, for instance, if you had ten countries fighting alongside you, they are bound to have more troops than one country, meaning they could send you aid that a single country may not be able to.
In conclusion, I (personally) think that having many different allies would be superior to having one strong ally as many allies could: give you more aid than that of a single country, if one ally would fall, you still have more, having many allies would help in a war as you could fight multiple fronts at the same time and, finally, in a war, if you had say, 5 countries with you, they could surround the enemy and destroy it from all sides.
Comments (0)