The main reason why strikes begin in the first place is because the workers are not satisfied. Normally this is the fault of the employer failing to meet their needs. Could it be possible that the workers might seek to overthrow their employer?
Most of the time when the people of a particular place find their leadership unsatisfactory, they might choose to overthrow it and do what they see fit instead. Should workers have complete control of their workplace, afterall they are the ones who do all of the work. I do not think so. The workers may be uncomfortable, but they should still be calm. There should be a process for going on strike. Workers taking over their workplace should not even be an option. Leadership has a lot of importance such as providing guidiance, motivation, coordination and most importantly helping them to achieve their goals. Their employer is their leader and no matter what they should learn to live in harmony for the sake of the business. I mean no one would like to work with a company where the workers and employers are at war.
Workers might want to get more rights for themselves in the workplace. Maybe some of them may even suggest being in control of their contract, meaning they couild change or breach it any time they like. This will be a disadvantage for the employer. Yes workers deserve their rights but giving them full control could tear down the business.