What's the best way to report about the Russia-Ukraine war: by sharing personal experiences or facts and statistics?
This post was written by a student. It has not been fact checked or edited.
The Russia-Ukraine war is a topic for now three years. It's been reported nearly every day since then with horrible news. For many people there is the question: How should the news look like and how should be reported? I think that the combination of both sharing personal experiences or opinions and facts or statistics is the right way to go. In my opinion you should not focus on only one of them. At first facts can quickly give an overview over a topic or situation, making it understandable for nearly everybody. Personal experiences or opinions can help to emphasize with a particular person or group and to support the given facts with an emotional Level of understanding. For example in my country (Germany) we have the "Tagesschau", which is the biggest News Broadcast. The "Tagesschau" often uses facts to report, followed bye personal experiences of people by interviewing them or reflecting their experiences or opinions. In my opinion this shows that using both ways of reporting is the best. One person who disagrees with my opinion is convinced to say that personal experiences and opinions distract form the facts because one particular person or group does not show the whole situation. However, I think my argument is stronger because These personal experiences help us to understand situations better, by focusing on one example. By combing facts or statistics with personal experiences or opinions, we can understand the situation the best because we have an overview which is supported by a strong emotional example of a situation.
Comments (6)
I see your point but the claim that personel stories help us understand situations better is not always true because these points of view can be too general and emotional bias. Tagesschau was an interesting example but we don't know if its fact because there is no definite evidence. It would be great to learn more about this.
You have expressed an engaging opinion on this topic. To what extent do you think an emotional, human understanding of a war is equal to/as beneficial as a statistical and historical understanding?
I second that, encouraging_llama. By having a somewhat combination of facts and statics with personal experiences and opinion can help us understand the situation better!
As facts and statics are devoid any emotion, they present a more objective and verifiable data. Whereas personal experiences vary from person to person, they are subjective and often based on the person's view.
Thus, I think to make the war news more understandable and reportable, we should combine authorized data and personal experience together. This will provide a more broader view of the war; so that we can understand things better.
I think the best way to report on the Russia-Ukraine war is by combining both facts and personal experiences. Imagine if you were reading a story, but all you got was dry facts—it would be like eating a sandwich with no filling, just bread.Facts are important because they give us the basics of what's happening. They give us the big picture, like the size of the war and the number of people affected. But without personal stories, it would be hard to truly feel the pain and impact on real people. Personal experiences are like the heart of the story, making it more relatable and emotional. They show us the human side, the faces behind the statistics.
For example, when news shows interviews of people who are suffering, it's like giving a face to a number. You can read all the stats you want, but hearing someone’s story is like stepping into their shoes and seeing the world from their eyes. It helps us connect, and it makes the news more meaningful. It’s not just about numbers, it's about lives—people who are scared, hurt, or even hopeful in the face of tragedy.
Of course, some people might say personal experiences distract from the facts, but I think that's a narrow way of thinking. Without emotions, the facts become cold and distant. When you mix both, you get the best of both worlds—a full picture that's not just informative but also deeply moving. It's like a puzzle where each piece fits perfectly together, giving you a clear and meaningful image.
The real question is, can we ever truly understand a crisis like this without hearing both the facts and the personal stories?
I feel that in my opinion the best way to report about the russia Ukraine war is by combining both facts, statistics and personal experiences.This is because of only the facts are shared, we don't get the full view of the problem and aren't able to see the problems from the eyes of the people affected.When only facts are shared they don't give tell us the problems like humans tell and so this doesn't help us connect with them.
On the other hand if only personal experiences are shared,Although we get about the problems from the people's own mouths but the statistics are not given and the experiences might vary from place to place where people are suffering.
And if we combine both of them we get a balanced report and a full view of the problems happening during warfare and we are able to form our opinions accordingly.
I honestly believe that personal stories are way more important than just facts! Facts are like numbers on a page—they tell you the information, but they don't really make you *feel* anything. It’s like reading a math book—sure, it tells you stuff, but it doesn't tug at your heart. But when you hear someone's personal story, it’s like you're right there with them, feeling what they feel. It makes everything real.
For example, if I hear a story about a family who had to run from their home because of the war, I can *picture* that family, their fear, and their struggle. That story stays in my mind far longer than just hearing that thousands of people have been displaced. The story shows me the *human* side of the facts—the pain, the fear, the hopes. It’s like seeing a photo of someone who’s been hurt rather than just reading about it in a report. The facts give you knowledge, but the personal stories give you understanding and make you care.
In the end, it’s those personal experiences that really stick with us. They help us see the bigger picture and make us realize that behind every number, there’s a person who’s suffering or fighting for their life. So, do you think that’s the best way to understand something as huge as the Russia-Ukraine war?
I feel that,in my opinion sharing personal stories is the best way to report about an ongoing war.Although facts and statistics are important because they give us the accurate data but just dry facts don't make that big of a difference.Instead personal stories lodge a much deeper impact on ourselves and make us experience the feelings and emotions the affected people are facing.
Imagine the current scenario about Russia Ukraine war where only facts are given about how many people are injured, number of Casualties etc. Those will feel just dry facts and won't be noticed or stand out in our brains for a long time.On the other hand if live videos or interviews of the affected people are shared,They give us a more humanly and personal feel which makes us feel the pain and dejection they are facing.The personal stories and experiences stay very long in our hearts and we remember them whenever we read about the news again.
So to conclude,I feel that even though facts are important but personal stories give us a full view and the bigger picture and lodge a greater impact within ourselves and stay longer in our minds,Thus I feel that Personal stories and experiences are the best way to report about ongoing problems and conflicts.