The common thing everyone is talking about today is AI art. Some speak of it is a beauty becuse of it's detail and because of the AI's ability to create art from previously existing ones, others say it is theft because the AI uses it's knowledge of art created by artists without their permission which makes them angry.
AI has the ability to build an artist's creativity and it alsohas the ability to completely replace artists all accross the world. Which do you think it will do? Atrificial Inteligence has the ability to do both but in your opinion which would it have more tendency of doing?
People say AI art can move and inspire because in a way, the machine uses its imagination and can often exceed human expectations. In their belief even though emotions don't motivate programs and their art, these creations can draw emotions out of you and even give you ideas for further expression. Others say AI has to feed on art pieces made by different people and recreate too similar a style. This is what makes it to be considered as art theft.
The thing I want to really know is how does AI affect the artists. Will it replace them or help them. AI can generate new art, from landscapes to abstract shapes, it can also automate processes such as colorization, creating new colors from existing images, and creating realistic textures, it can generate music, helping artists create new sounds and beats without having to learn a musical instrument. But, some say it can replace artists.
In my opinion AI can replace artists but will no because though it has made significant progress in generating visual and audio content, it still lacks the creativity and human touch that is intrinsic to art. And without human art for AI to use as data to learn, art is useless.
What is your opinion?