The risk of misinformation
Discussion statements | This is for ages 10 to 13
People get news and political information from many places, including social media, TV and friends. Not all of this information is true. Sometimes it is false or misleading information that is spread without the person knowing that it's inaccurate.
Do you agree or disagree with the statement below? Explain why.
Older voters (aged 60+) are more at risk from misinformation and fake news than younger voters.
Tell us what you think
You might want to structure your answer like this:
I agree / disagree with this statement because [your reason]. Another reason for my view is [a second reason or example].
Make sure you read the comments from other Topical Talkers to see whether you agree or disagree with them.
Comments (124)
I think that the misinformation is very important to correct, some persons believed whatever they saw in social media without ckecking if it was even real, having a different perspective of what they´ve just seen, that person might talk about politics and can have different ideas, but, if that person tells them what they have heard it might lead to a misunderstanding of the topic. HoweverI think people who likes to talk about politics with their friends or family hould be well informed and if they have seen something important that might vary your ot they´re opinion should check if that information you should see if it is actually real and its not something that has been made up by someone because therefore someone has published some fake news just so the people vote to whoever they want to win.
Hi Shining Currency, I'm Radhika and I work at KPMG - great to see your comment! I agree with your view that 'misinformation is very important to correct'. I wonder what you think about the question that older voters are more at risk from misinformation than younger voters - do you think this is correct? Or do you think that misinformation is something that affects voters of all ages? It'd be great to know what you think!
In my opinion I think older voters are at more risk from misinformation and fake news more than younger votes.I think this because of the use of AI older people are more easily tricked into believing misinformation. Studies show that adults over 60+ are more likely to believe and share political misinformation including AI deep fakes,and false information from social media.This shows that older voters are more likely to fall for misinformation then people younger than 60.
Thanks for sharing your opinions admirable_cookie! Well done for using a source to support your viewpoint.
I disagree with the statement that older people are more at risk than younger people, because, in my opinion, the younger ones are easy to influence and convince because they are gullible. They are the ones who spend lots of time on the social media, they believe everything they see without filtering the information not minding if the information is misleading and fake.
Another reason for standing on this is because there are more older people have better judgement because of their experiences, and not based on whatever pops up on the media. Most of them will rather read news papers, filter information before visiting social media.
I agree with you because in the world where there are many deepfake videos and "fake news" all around. Older people can not differentiate between the original videos and the fake, especially tiktok videos that now have many AI generated contents. Content creators make it look so realistic and it is almpst difficult to differentiate real from fake. There are cases where older people share fake news and they think they are real.
Due to this, they easily fall for untrue news and this may influence their decision in voting.
I agree because, younger people below the age of 60 are more computer literate and can find out if a news report is fake or true but people above the age of 60 are more gullible and can be deceived by AI and social media because they are not computer literates. The ability for them to identify new technological trends especially AI related trends is lower therefore making them vulnerable to misinformation.
I agree with you because a lot of elderly people can easily fall for misinformation and scams. I also agree when you said that the elderly people can see false information from social media. It's very annoying because you are suppose to respect the elderly people, not take advantage of them by making them fall for scams. This is honestly disrespectful.
PEOPLE NEED TO RESPECT THE ELDERLY!
I agree and disagree with this statement because in 2026, there is much AI being used. AI is currently evolving and it causes an advantage for 60+ people to fall for fake information spread with AI. However, younger generations are affected too. There are many things going on around social media, which can include misinformation. Younger generations are at a higher advantage of misinformation, since the younger generation are most likely to believe the first thing they see. Another reason for my view is because of the much higher risk of seeing these fake news on social media.
You raised an interesting point, affable_atom - young people are indeed exposed to much misinformation due to their higher use of social media. But do you think older people might be more at risk because they grew up trusting their news sources?
I agree with the notion that senior voters, those 60+, are at a higher risk of being misled by misinformation and fake news than younger voters,high risk of being misled by misinfomation and fake news than younger voters and that this is closely linked to how people process and trust information. The first reason for this is that many senior voters have been brought up to read the news in a time when the media was strictly controlled and generally trustworthy. This means that they may well believe that the information they are getting now has the same level of truth, even if it is from unverified sources on the internet. The second reason is that the people who spread misinformation are often targeting senior voters specifically. People who spread fake news use techniques such as appealing to emotions, such as fear, nostalgia, or security concerns to make their misleading news seem urgent and credible. And, of course, senior voters may feel less comfortable using technology to check the sources of the information, look at doctored photos, or identify information that is being promoted by algorithms. Young voters are at the risk of misinformation, but they are more likely to realise that information on the internet is not always trustworthy, so they are more likely to question what they are seeing...
Hi Talkative Statement. My name is Radhika from KPMG and it's great to see your comments! I wanted to ask further about your comment that 'people who spread fake news use techniques such as appealing to emotions'. Do you think that younger voters can also be influenced by these same techniques, for example by appealing to emotion on subjects that young people care about such as climate change, education and housing? And do you think this could make people of all ages at risk of believing misinformation? It'd be great to know your views further!
I think that any information given to should be confirmed before being transferred to another person .
Hello gregarious_pomegranate, how do you suggest that we do this?
I THINK younger voters are prom to fake news because they are not familiar to political related content and cad verify certain information when given so all they do is to accept it the way they see it but adult who is over 60 and has leaved an experienced life can easily verify the source of that information before believing for the young minds they, have matters they are love more than political issues this would make them display more non-caring attitude towards political issues.
I strongly disagree with the saying "Older voters are more at risk of misinformation and fake news than younger people" because...
Younger people have no experience in politics and can easily be deceived and manipulated by what they hear or see online on social media platforms. Most politicians and influencers use that as an advantage to spread false news and pretend to be good just to get the support of the younger ones. For instance, a candidate of an election might come online on social media to make promises of how he would make a country a better place for its citizens to live in, providing free education and technological devices in schools and hospitals but after gaining the support of the people especially the youths, he would turn his back on them and would not fulfil any of those promises.
Hi Adept Tornado, my name is Radhika and I work at KPMG. It's great to see your comment! Can I ask further about your comment that 'younger people have no experience in politics and can easily be deceived and manipulated by what they hear or see online on social media platforms'. I can see the merit in this argument, but I also wonder what you think about older people who have very strong opinions after decades of experiencing the political system i.e. the opposite of a young person with no political experience. What if those older people could be more easily persuaded by misinformation that supports the opinions they already have - that they can believe misinformation that reinforces their prejudices? How much of a risk do you think this is? I'm interested to hear your views!
Hi,
I agree with you, because In Romania the typical retirement age is 65, so I think it would be completely unfair for those same people to lose their right to vote at 60. If this happens, then for five years, they would face all the effects of the choices made by leaders they did not choose, they were not allowed to choose. From my point of view, this would mean a violation of human rights. In addition to that, I know that there are concerns about whether people are still able to make good decisions at that age. Those are valid. However, I believe those are 60 years worth of wisdom, of mistakes and lessons learned. For example, in my country, someone that age still remembers what communism looked like and how many people lost their lives to get rid of it. Grandparents tell stories about the winters when there was no heating and they had to cover the windows with rugs or blankets in order to keep the cold outside. They certainly wouldn't vote for a candidate that shows signs of wanting to bring back this regime. Younger people, on the other hand might not be able to recognize this kind of tells, since they have never lived through anything similar. In this case, I think it is crucial for the older generation to act quickly by explaining why the person in question wouldn't be a good leader, and by voting for another candidate themselves. They have fought for their rights. In my opinion, they don't deserve to lose them, while they are still able to think critically.
I disagree with this statement because younger people use more social media which has a lot of fake news and young voters are easily influenced which can lead to the risk of misinformation. For example, my grandmother does not use things like Instagram, Facebook etc that is why I believe that young voters are at more risk than the older voters.
You say "younger people use more social media" - can you share your evidence for this?
I agree with this statement because according to my research, people over 60 have is twice as likely to fall for tricks and believe politicians than younger people from 18 to 40/50. Also, according to my searches, Older people share misinformation and younger people fail to recognize it. As we dive into 2026, the facts of 2025 shapes it. The percentage of misinformation from 2024 to 2025 dramatically increased by 30%. The world is getting anxious, with 87% of people saying it has already shaped their countries politics. We cannot risk the world becoming full of disinformation. So in conclusion, I agree with this statement.
Thanks for sharing your research. What do you think can be done to prevent misinformation being spread, especially among older people?
I believe that older people should be taught by young adults how to decode news. For example, they can be told that the real news is calmer and informative, has links to major TV channels, will not necessarily compel you to share or forward, and there is always a balance between facts and evidence. Unlike fake news which would make one angry, agitated, or very afraid.
I disagree with this statement as older people are often equipped with prior knowledge which young people might not have. I believe younger voters are more likely to be at risk from misinformation and fake news because of the digital age we are at. Youngers voters are susceptible to information overload and sometimes low quality content they consume often seen in social media handle and because they lack the history of previous events to be able to argue against a current news.
An interesting thought, thankful_aspect - can you think of a way younger voters might be provided with reliable sources of information outside of their usual digital platforms?
I disagree with the statement that older voters (aged 60+) are more at risk from misinformation and fake news than younger voters because vulnerability to false information depends more on media habits and critical thinking than on age alone. Many older voters rely on established news sources such as television, newspapers, and official websites, which are often more regulated and fact-checked than some online platforms. Their life experience can also help them recognise exaggerated claims or biased arguments, especially when they have seen similar political narratives repeated over time.
Another reason for my view is that younger voters are often exposed to a much higher volume of information through social media apps, where misinformation spreads quickly through algorithms, influencers, and viral posts. Because content on these platforms is designed to grab attention rather than provide accuracy, younger users may encounter misleading headlines, edited videos, or fake statistics without realising it. In some cases, information shared by friends or popular creators can feel trustworthy even when it is not, making it harder to question.
However, others might argue that older voters are less familiar with digital technology and may struggle to tell the difference between reliable and unreliable online sources. While this can be true for some individuals, it is unfair to generalise an entire age group.
Overall, misinformation is a problem that affects voters of all ages, and tackling it requires better media education for everyone, not blaming one generation.
Hi independent_musician, those are all very interesting points. Can you provide any evidence on how you describe different generations consuming media?
I disagree because... even though they are old they can't easily fall for miscommunication this is because
firstly the old people are learned and more experienced than us they have faced many in which they each learnt a lesson example the economist foundation have gone through their own risks of life and have a good number of knowledge and experience that is why they can't be easily fooled and established the topical talk activity showing us that the old are wise and can't be miscommunicated
secondly the young people prove to be more connected to the modern world and social media than the old people who were born before the creation of modernity example the act of under 16 owning a phone
Although all ages seem to be affected by miscommunition the effect on the young is higher
please I would also like to know other perspective in this topic because it is only by putting our head together that were going to find the solution
I partly agree that older voters are more at risk from misinformation and fake news, but I do not think they are the only vulnerable group. People of all ages can be misled, although for different reasons.
Older voters did not grow up with the internet and social media, so many are less familiar with how online platforms work. They may trust messages on Facebook, WhatsApp or TV without checking the source. Fake websites, scams and edited videos can look very convincing, and some older people lack the digital skills to recognise these tricks. This can make them easier targets for political propaganda.
Still, younger voters are not necessarily safer. Although they are confident with technology, they often get news from influencers, short videos or headlines rather than reliable sources. Today, AI can create realistic images, voices and even news articles. Many young people struggle to recognise AI-generated misinformation. Deepfakes and manipulated posts spread quickly, and youth sometimes share them without realising they are false.
Social media algorithms also show users content that matches their views, causing both young and old voters to ignore different perspectives. The real problem is not age but media literacy, conducting our own research and critical thinking.
Hence, misinformation is a danger to everyone. Instead of assuming older voters are more gullible, societies should teach all citizens how to check facts and identify trustworthy information.
I agree with you. I think younger people are just at risk as older people because during an election so many people just want to share their opinions. Younger voters are often passionate, they always care too much, they are either overly excited or just angry. They are likely to click on the share button without checking to see if the story is true or false, this often happens because they always online with their family and friends. They might just believe the rumours because a loved one sent it.
Though older voter have more experience, they can easily be pranked or tricked since they did grow up with the internet. A good number of them are still trying to navigate the internet. With so many content creators trying to create videos, they can be tricked by fake videos and pictures as they might be able to tell if it is a prank or fact.
So whether you are 16 or 60 years old, it is important to always double check information, think about it before posting. It is also very important not to be ruled by your emotions.
All very good points, mirthful_cloudberry, and a well balanced argument! Can you think of a way that this misleading information could be fact-checked to provide balanced data across all ages?
I disagree with this statement because younger people are more likely to use social media and the internet then older people and could be influenced by others. Another reason for my view is younger people believe most things they see on the internet even if it isn't really true and could make them pick someone they didn't really want to pick because of what they saw.
I agree that older voters (60+) would have more of a risk of misinformation because they are more likely to get confused on social media platforms because they are older than us and did not grow up with high technology. Also, elderly people get confused by things like AI which stands for artificial intelligence. 16 and 17 year olds do not get confused on social media like elderly do they could still get a little bit confused but definitely not as much as 60+ people.
I think older people will get more confused because Ai will puzzle them so they will choose what the ai person wants . Then they will want to change their answer but they can't, they will be angry with Ai but will have to go with the flow instead of the person they want . If they want to change they won't be able to, they don't know what to do. They wouldn't choose that person if they know what ai is . But some younger people do go on social media a lot and might get tricked but some younger people know what ai is. If they don't they will most probably pick the wrong person .
Hi Optimistic Seed, my name is Radhika and I work at KPMG. It's great to see your comment! I can see that you're interested in how AI can influence how people vote. What do you think about misinformation on social media that is not created by AI? Do you think both older and younger people can still be misled by this type of non-AI misinformation? And even though younger people know what AI is, do you think they have the skills to detect AI misinformation vs non-AI misinformation? And do you think the risks are different in AI vs non-AI misinformation? It'd be great to know your thoughts further!
I think older people will get more confused because Ai will puzzle them so they will choose what the ai person wants . Then they will want to change their answer but they can't, they will be angry with Ai but will have to go with the flow instead of the person they want . If they want to change they won't be able to, they don't know what to do. They wouldn't choose that person if they know what ai is . But some younger people do go on social media a lot and might get tricked but some younger people know what ai is. If they don't they will most probably pick the wrong person .
I agree because even though they may have more experience compared to younger voters, they don't have as much digital and AI knowledge. But sadly, the AI itself is growing and is becoming more confusing to them. However, the younger generation do have this knowledge as that is what they grew up surrounded by. This is also shown in studies that 60+ people are more exposed to manipulation which is commonly used in the form of digital technology. So they are more likely to fall for false information.
I agree as the younger generation know the most about the newest technology and the older generation don't know much about the latest technology therefore the older generation are at a risk of misinformation and manipulation. The younger generation are not at as much of a high risk of manipulation and misinformation as they know the most about the newest technology and know to not trust AI deep fakes therefore people that are older than sixty are at higher risk of being misled.
i think 60+ and under 18 are more vulnerable about fake news because people over 60 didn't have this type of electronics when they were kids so they are not aware of fake information and kids normally have no idea what they are doing so they can manipulate the kids. Older people don't know how it works and can't have better opportunities to vote because the world is all tech tech tech so in a way younger people have better knowledge over tech so false information is kind of easier for them.
I disagree with this statement as younger children possibly know more about technology (mainly newer ) so they may know how to decode fake information better although 60+ have existed longer so they may have stored more information and know the difference between fake and true. Yes, I'm saying the same reason with both generations, but younger people may want nothing to do with this, and may not be able to control their temper and possibly start yelling. This can be bad for mental heath.
I agree that misinformation affects 60+ more than younger voters because they are older and believe things that are not true on the internet. That makes them do something they don't want to and they wont know what to do next.
Hi Capable Huckleberry, my name is Radhika and I work at KPMG. Great to see your comment! I wonder - do you have any evidence that older people 'believe things that are not true on the internet' and that this affects older people more than younger people? Can you give some examples of where this has happened? And do you think inexperience from younger people can potentially make them more at risk of believing misinformation? I'd be keen to know your views!
I agree with this because not every thing you on social media is real because Ai can make some people believe what they see on social media. I feel that people over 60 years old are more likely to believe whatever they see . Also if many people do the same thing they will get more confused.
I think that is true because apps can and will make videos out of artificial intelligence and older people usually believe in fake videos. Also,many people who create those videos put very similar videos so when the same person sees those videos that will make them believe it.
I think there a higher chance elderly people would fall for artificial intelligence because they are not good at recognising it and they will accept it and they they wont notice and they will carry on think it real.
Hi extraordinary_orangutan, can you explain why you think that?
I agree with this statement because according to some articles I read, older voters (over the age of 60) are more likely at risk to misinformation and fake news than younger voters. Studies shows that cognitive functions, such as how well our brain processes information, declines as we age and impact decision-making.
For example, among people around 60 years of age or older, declines in analytical thinking are associated with reduced ability to detect false news stories.
Another reason for this is because older people tend to get all the information mixed up. This will lead to them believing in their false memories (misinformation effect). And if they spread the wrong news to other people, it will create a chain effect where people started to accept these incorrect news. Results can be very disastrous, and that's why we should double check the information that we recieve. Also we should tell our families (especially our grandparents) and friends to not trust all information given to us so easily.
I agree with this statement because they do not understand the internet as well as the younger people. People who are 60+ did not grow up using the internet so they do not understand things such as AI. Another reason for my view is they also do not really understand that AI can create images that are not real. Where as younger people understand AI more as this is what they have grown up with making them more aware of fake news.
I agree with this statement that older people may be more vulnerable because they grew up without the internet so they may be persuaded easier or be led into naïve choices.
Also they may be vulnerable to mislead information because some might think the internet is all truth and no lies.
They also might not check information and vote for any party within parliament for anything they say.
They may be led upon wrong choices because of what someone says or what they think may be better for Britain while it actually is not .
For this reason, I agree.
I think that misinformation will lead others into making the wrong choices. I also think that they will be manipulated to choose the Prime Minister instead of the correct answer. The reason people fell for this is because they did not think about the fake information on the internet and believed whatever they saw. They did not think about misinformation on the internet. People will be making the wrong choices because of the people trying to manipulate them. They do not think twice and make the wrong decisions. They manipulate them to make more votes for the Prime Minister to stay.
Hello I am shy_robin, I think that miss information is very important to correct, some people believe whatever they see in social media with out checking if it was real. I think older voters will get confused by the tech and the fake news and I think any info given must be confirmed before transferring to a different person or somebody might publish some fake news.
I think that the misinformation is incredibly important to correct because some people believe what they see in social media, for example like youtube shorts, because if you are just watching and find something with fake information without checking if it was true having a different perspective of what happened is quite dangerous. That person might talk and spread misunderstanding news that is not real.
I agree because older people can miss information that is important and usually the internet is false so that makes it easier to believe because it is harder to understand as you get older because you can get tricked. So that is why I think that older people can get very confused with elections like the ones coming up.
I think that the lack of brain development when you get 60+ starts to rot so they should put a rule in place so then if they really think their vote should go through it should be able to impact the election fairly.So they should be reassured if their scared to vote mainly because of dementia or brain cancer.
What makes you believe that one's brain begins to rot at 60-years-old?
Yes I agree that older people will not have a good understanding of electing the prime minister because they do not have the best experience with technology. they may not be aware of the AI technology an whatever they see they pretty much believe anything they see or believe.
I agree that older votes are more at risk from misinformation and fake news than younger voters because they are as familiar with the internet.
My thought is that older folks are more at risk for misinformation fake news than young ones because when 60+ year-olds as a teen and young adult, there wasn't a purpose for false information, so they believe everything. 30 years later, they still have the same attribute of believing others just because.
The younger society are currently known for being stubborn, not trusting people and standing on business as well as checking every little detail for misleading data.
Comparing them both, according to being deceived by fictitious facts, the older communities fall into the *fooled easily* section of the pyramid (the base section).
While the younger folks fall into the *complex deceived* (the tippy top).
In conclusion, older societies are more easily deceived that young ones.
@triumphant_memory: I'm not entirely sure about this. The concept of "propaganda" - or the deliberate manipulation of information - is not new, and has been around for hundreds of years. So, why do you think that older communities are more easily fooled today than the younger generation?
I totally agree that older people are more at risk from misinformation because they are often less familiar with social media and new technologies . Many of them don't us mobile phones or apps very often , which can make it easier to trick them . In addition , older people usually manage important things like money and personal informations but young people are not affected by misinformation so much because they are still young . That's it
Thanks
I agree that older voters are potentially more vulnerable to misinformation, and I have witnessed this firsthand. My grandma used to shout, "it's a holiday tomorrow due to rain" after reading a false news article. Almost every morning, a message pops up to the family WhatsApp group with a sensational headline and with a serious tone. No malicious intent but it looks official, so it must be true. For my generation, it's a different story altogether. We have been raised to see doctored screenshots, manipulated videos and sensational headlines everyday. We don't necessarily trust what looks convincing. We fact check comments, verify sources and sometimes we just have a hunch that something is being scripted.
This doesn't mean that young voters are smarter. It means that we have been through experience. Older voters have been raised in a time when information traveled slowly and when credibility was guarded. Misinformation travels quickly and puts on the cloak of authority.
The problem isn't the age. It's that trust hasn't evolved at the same speed as technology. And until it does, misinformation will keep winning.
Your point on the speed of news travelling is very interesting. Can you explain what you mean when you say that "credibility was guarded"?
I agree with this statement because younger generation are more aware of AI and obvious scams as they are quite used to this, but whereas older generation 60+ didn't have AI back then and online scams. Older generation are more at risk to be a victim to fake news according to research.
Another reason for my view is older people didn't have Social media back then such as Tiktok, Youtube, Instagram, Snap chat, etc, but Gen Alpha and Genz had that type of childhood completely different to Millennials.
The internet is meant to be a safe place to enjoy, find out new things, share opinions and communicate, but numerous people hoping for attention and views like to post misinformation.
So in conclusion I agree with this statement.
I think that in a way the statement is true but not totally true. I agree and disagree at same time.
I agree because... this current era deals with AI a lot and as such most young people can identify them because they are into it. AND
I disagree because;
1. The older ones are way more experienced than the young ones in the political activities and has higher tendency of making a right choice.
2. The older ones has a greater chance of having a more trusted friend or college than we may have, who will supply them with a more true information than we can ever get.
I disagree with this statement because I think younger people are more vulnerable to misinformation than older people. My reason is because older people have a better understanding of the world because they have lived longer than young people, and the longer you live on earth, the more painful and practical things you see, so they would be able to differentiate between the real and the fake news more intelligently. Another reason for my view is that some ignorant teenagers can just give in to whatever they hear and assume it is legit, then they begin to spread false rumours about news they are unsure of without even going back to confirm whether it is true or not. I can say so because I am a teen myself and have actually suffered the consequences of fake news.
In my opinion, old voters are more at risk of misinformation and fake news this is because young votes have more knowledge and information about the internet and technology because it's their generation, due to this they have studied the internet and are more able to detect fake information or AI made-up stories. Also, research and statistics show that "adults older than 60 were likelier than younger adults to read and share misinformation online even if they were similarly skeptical of false headlines"
In addition, other statistics also show that "66% of adults aged 60+ and above say they intentionally seek out news often or extremely often on the internet compared with only 22% of youths ages 18-29" which lead to a higher tendency of misinformation and false news among them.
I agree with this statement because I feel that younger people will be more capable of identifying what's fake and what's new. Since young people are often seen as being up to date with the latest trends and all, I believe it should be easy to distinguish between authentic and misleading information. Just as we can recognise the difference between a fake and designer material, I believe that spotting what is fake and real will be as straightforward.
hi dear topical talkers I agree with this statement I think that misinformation is a marketing mistake because the news we get today is really cheap to produce and really expensive to verify social media rewards speed and emotion not accuracy the real issues is that the people are not stupid it's the system itself. so, until accuracy becomes more better than attention misinformation will keep winning. A second reason for my view is that over time misinformation will change how we think about leaders, politics and soon even each other so I agree with this statement.
signing off: fair minded elephant
I agree with this statement but we have to understand what misinformation means. Misinformation can be when a person believes in something without know in detail what does it means. For example, if a person wathces a video saying that the Sun is grey instead of yellow or orange and that person doesn't have reasons to belive in that but he still believes, that is misinformation. So yes, I believe older voters are at a more high risk than for exapmle 30 years old people because, apart from not knowing how social media works, they are not mentally that strong because of the age. Also, I think young people, between 18-25 years old people, are also easy to have that risk, becuase they believe in all without having data or knowledge about that fact. I know there are lots of other opinions and I would like to read them.
I agree with this statement to some extent because while older voters might be misinformed due to their lack of experience in a world full of news which we don't know is fake or real, younger people are still learning about the world and might be misled by information they see online simply because it was said or posted by a celebrity. Another reason for my opinion is that older voters might also distance themselves from technology and find out more about politics through conversation or the actual news while more and more younger people use technology on a day to day basis, which puts them at risk at finding misinformation from apps like TikTok.
I disagree with that statement ,as the most affected people in regarding the spread of misinformation is mostly young people. Young people get influenced easily which leads them into believing misinformation and fake protests ,without the knowledge of it being wrong which ,also makes then tell others about it making it spread hurriedly .
Older people on the other hand might recognise misinformation as for them being more experienced ,making them spot inaccurate information easily , even if they aren't experienced about the topic being talked about ;they will still interpret it as disinformation since it might appear "too unbelievable".
Overall , the people being affected in this talk are; mostly young people ,not older people as older ones are more experienced, while younger people believe misinformation too easily.
Hello! I'm reasoning_strawberry and I agree that old people are more at risk of misinformation than younger kids because they can easily fall for the new technology used for misinformation. The new technology I'm speaking about is AI, specifically Generative AI. Generative AI creates realistic images, voices, and videos, like SoraAI. AI is improving to the point it's almost realistic. Due to how realistic it is, older people are more at risk for falling for AI. Another reason is that they don't really go into detail to see if it's true or not. Social Media like Facebook holds a lot of misinformation, and over 50% of old people use Facebook, where there is plenty of AI and fake news. For example, my grandmother watches Facebook and she often falls for AI.
I 100% agree with you because, AI can generate realistic voices, images, videos that are able to convince older people to follow wrong information. Researchers claim that over 50% of old people are vulnerable to misinformation. I have heard rumors about people saying that when people grow and age, their knowledge of things goes low so, I use this opinion to support the fact that old people are vulnerable to misinformation. Social media contains a lot of misinformation and, when old people open social media platforms like, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok, they are likely to believe any post that pops up, whether it is true or false.
I don't totally agree with you. Could young voters be equally vulnerable but in different ways maybe through visual misinformation or influencer narratives?
Yes, some young people can be vulnerable to some of the misinformation that are AI generated because, over the years, technology has been evolving and because it is evolving, and becoming more realistic and entertaining resulting to convincing some young people to believe what they see. Just like I said, there are a lot of social media platforms that make misinformation realistic and convincing, causing both young and old people to become vulnerable to misinformation.
Thanks reasoning_strawberry. This is a really good point. You say that older people are more at risk of falling for AI, and don't check the details to see whether it is true or not. Can you explain why the risk of falling for AI is therefore lower for younger kids?
i dissagree because lots of young people like people who watch alot of youtube and tiktok might give misinformation for young people my second reason is that if young people see bad stuff about polotics that are not true they wont look at the good side of stuff
I partly disagree with this statement because young people, without realising, consume misinformation and propaganda on social media platforms e.g Tiktok and Instagram, daily due to addictive short-form content. This can have a significant impact on elections, as impressionable minds are more susceptible to its influence, whether it is from satirical parodies or their favourite influencers.
However, the reason I partly disagree with the statement is that seniors (60+) are nonetheless susceptible to misinformation themselves. In a similar way that teens are unable to ascertain what is right, older generations do not have the same skills that kids today have. Compared to 20-30 years ago, you wouldn't have had the same fast-paced and refined internet with constant notifications or pop-ups, making it hard for older people to grapple with using phones. The massive generational gap also marks the difference in information literacy, making informed decisions based on the info you have evaluated.
A major error I find common when I see friends my age sending me misinformation or my parents watching AI reels is that there is a lack of competency when presented with it. As technology is heavily integrated into our lives, we must be educated on what type of news is credible, trustworthy, and worth our time.
This is a well argued point @victorious_strategy. Can you say more about who should be educated on what kind of news is credible and trustworthy?
I partly agree with this statement because some older voters may be less familiar with how misinformation spreads online, especially on social media platforms where fake news can look very convincing. This can make it harder for them to check sources or tell the difference between reliable information and false content.
Another reason for my view is that older voters may place more trust in information shared by friends or family, even if it is inaccurate. However, this doesn't mean younger voters are immune to misinformation. Younger people can also be influenced, especially by viral posts, influencers, or biased content.
This issue links to the wider topic of digital literacy and media education. Improving people's ability to critically evaluate information (no matter their age) can help reduce the impact of fake news on all voters.
I agree with this statement. In the past, people did not have AI or technology like TikTok, Facebook or YouTube so they are the most likely to believe in fake and wrong news. They can believe anything easily in the social media because they did not have any technology in their generation. This is extremely terrible since hackers can send them links to hack their bank accounts and steal all the money in them.
In my country, Egypt, there are millions of old people that got scammed and their money was stolen so that the Egyptian government had a creative idea by doing many engaging advertisements on Tv that show how did old people get scammed. Even the banks in Egypt like the Egyptian Bank did a unique add that talks about the same point. This somehow reduced the problem even this news was reported in all the Egyptian newspapers.
Young people and adults can also get fake news by getting pranked by the AI videos. AI now became quite realistic by its voice and appearance. Consequently, I always tell my parents to ask me if the video was AI or not.
Even in the elections, some of the candidates can buy followers in the social media to make more people vote for him or her. Unfortunately, some candidates can spread fake news about other candidates. Some also promise us with a lot of promises and changes, but nothing happens if they won the election. Candidates can give poor people goods like oil and sugar to vote for them. This can spread fake news between all people.
To conclude, all people can get fooled by fake news so that they can vote in the elections inaccurately.
To be honset that is a tough statemnt that can't be directly answered.Talking about the older people,we already know that they are well-experienced in all fields of life,especially thatt hey have come across a lot of situations and have experienced different periods of their countries where they do understand more than young people.They have seen things taking actions and can easily distingush between what is true and what is fake,what can be achieved and what is a lie.They could tell a lot.When I talk to my grandparents,I find that they are so wise and tell me more predictions about the future which prove really true.On the other hand,we are in the age of technology andsocial media where a lot of false information is provided and spread. It is so easy to falsify facts and provide wrong information especially if we are talking about using AI in all fields.Using statistics is easier now and the older generations can be deceived easily compared to younger people who are living this AI-age with greater knowledge of how false information can made to look exactly like facts.Knowledge is power and little knowledge is a dnagerous thing.To agree with this statemnt require a lot of surveys and depend on having accurate information about the elderly which I think is hard to provide. To be honest,for me I think that this statemnt is true since technolog can create a fake wolrd that can trick the most experienced ones.
Great points here @honest_explanation about the knowledge our elders hold about the histories of our countries, and different periods they have gone through and experienced. Can you explain more about what you mean when you say, "little knowledge is a dangerous thing"?
Recent researchs said that misinformation is a crucial issue in politics for the society. Nowadays some people claim that older voters aged more that 60 years old can have a higher risk when we talk about dealing with digital misinformation.
Even though social media is remarkably normalized in society, older people have not experienced it all their lives as teenagers have. Due to this fact, they usually find it more difficult to identify reliable or non-reliable sources or content done by AI which is making news more and more realistic. Nontheless, young people are also exposed to misinformation but they know how to handle it since they have more familiarity with this technology.
To conclude, I believe it is not the only factor, knowledge plays a more esential role on it.
I agree with this statement because many older people watch a lot of television and news channels and they do not have much of an understanding of what is true and what is fake ( AI and deep fakes) on the internet since they were born in a world that didn't revolve around technology and it wasn't very significant as it is today, for example someone may watch fake news and absorb the wrong information. Another reason why i agree with this statement is due to the fact that older people may have old beliefs on society and politics as they were raised that way, for example people may think that racism is still okay because equality wasn't as normalised as it is today. Also many older people have difficulties with reading or hearing clearly so they could misinterpret information that is given to them and there is lots of new slang that can be hard to understand and that could lead to lots of miscommunication and misinformation.
You make some interesting points and I have given you a star for your clear communication, but there are some generalisations in there too. What do you think an older person would say in response to you? Do you think they would agree?
I think that the misinformation should be limitid for people under 10 are 9
I partly agree with this statement because older voters can be more at risk from misinformation, especially online. Research has shown that people aged 60+ often find it harder to tell real news from fake news due to lower digital media literacy and also tell AI deepfakes apart from humans. In real life, many scam reports show that older people are common victims of tech-support and AI voice scams pretending to be from trusted companies like Microsoft or banks.
On the other hand, older voters are not always easily misled. Many of them do not use social media regularly, which is where most fake news spreads quickly. Instead, they rely on television or newspapers, reducing their exposure to online misinformation and political influencers.
In conclusion, while older voters face real challenges with digital misinformation, age alone is not the problem digital awareness and exposure matter more.
Well done thankful_fig for using different pieces of information to support your opinion.
I disagree with this statement because nowadays younger people use social media more than older people and younger people might be more influenced by social media because they are most likely on it everyday. Another reason for my view is in my personal opinion older people are more smarter than younger people and know who to vote for since they have been in the world longer than the young people and they know who to vote for from their past experiences of voting. Lastly,younger people might not be mature enough to actually vote and might mess up the election since there might be 1.5 million new vote which is a lot and is nearly enough to ruin the election. In conclusion, I personally don't think the UK should let 16 & 17 year old's vote for the next general election for the new prime minister.
I agree with this statement because sixty plus can think that AI is real,like how people use sora AI to trick the people how cannot tell the different between real life and AI .Another reason for my view is that people can remove the watermark that sora uses to make sure that people can not tell the different any more .So because of this reasoning sixty plus should not vote any more .On the another hand young people are causing the problem so if the people cause the problem are voting that would make it unfair for the elderly.
I agree with this statement because people have been starting to use AI and they have been starting to post mean comments about other people that is not true. Another reason for my view is that on games like Roblox and Fortnite, people have been starting to act like children but are actually adults and they lie. People have been making important people look like a joke and have been adding comments and funny emojis on pictures of them.
When information is wrongly passed it leads to the breaking down of the voting rule, because every rule has a reason, so information should not be misinformed to avoid unnecessary warrants, just like the Nigerian stories on the recent presidential election, see the situation we are today.
so, the proper thing should always be done during voting.
I party agree, that older people are at risk from misinformation and fake news.
Research shows that older people are more at risk of fall into misinformation because of less digital accuracy.
older people (60+) are more likely to fall into misinformation because of less use of gadgets exposing them to the world. Some examples are like social media platforms.
In addition, old people forget how to operate certain devices used because of aging (old age).
Another point of my view is that old people make less use of the internet ( going online), visiting webpages, websites, online games and apps. Old people have less experience on technological gadgets, especially the ones that were not yet present and invented during their time as children. Thus lack of experience and usage of gadgets make them fall into misinformation and fake news.
thanks!!!
Good day ✔
Misinformation is when you get information but it is true or a real fact .
I disagree with this statement because so many younger voter are influence by social media and people around them and some of this information are not always true or mislead . another reason of my view is sometimes emotion can also cause mislead example if now you see a post on social media and it makes you angry or have fear you may not think of checking if it is true or false but older voter can control emotion more than younger voter allowing them to checking if it is true or false .
AI is something every one use and sometimes people use it to mislead example if now you see a video and it is real like you may believe in it
I disagree with the statement because it is mostly the younger people that will actually be at risk of being misinformation and fake news because they are the one that consume most information on social media. This information might not be true, but just to either gain followers.
Thank you
I partly agree with this statement because older voters can be more at risk from misinformation, especially online. Research has shown that people aged 60+ often find it harder to tell real news from fake news due to lower digital media literacy. Studies also found that older adults are more likely to share false political content on social media. In real life, many scam reports show that older people are common victims of tech-support and AI voice scams pretending to be from trusted companies like Microsoft or banks.
On the other side, older voters are not always easily misled. Generally many of them do not use social media regularly, which is where most fake news spreads quickly. Instead, they rely on television or newspapers, reducing their exposure to online misinformation and political influencers.
In conclusion, while older voters face real challenges with digital misinformation, age alone is not the problem digital awareness and exposure matter more.
I agree with this statement because many older voters didn’t grow up using the internet or social media, so it can be harder for them to tell what news is real and what is fake. Sometimes they might believe something just because it’s shared a lot or comes from someone they trust.
Younger people are usually more used to being online, so they see fake news more often and learn to question it. They also talk about things with friends or see different opinions online, which helps them understand when something doesn’t seem right.
This doesn’t mean older people are bad at voting or that young people always know better, but younger voters are generally more familiar with how misinformation spreads, which makes them less likely to fall for it.
I neither agree nor disagree because I have two perspectives to share. On one hand, older voters are often more vulnerable to misinformation because rapid advances in AI—such as deepfake videos, cloned voices, and highly realistic images, exploit gaps in digital media literacy, especially among people who grew up in an era where information was largely trustworthy. Studies and real-world examples, including AI scams and false political content on platforms like Facebook, show that adults over 60 are more likely to believe and share misleading content. On the other hand, younger generations are not immune either; while they tend to be more skeptical and fact-check information, they are exposed to a much higher volume of misinformation and can fall for more complex, emotionally driven narratives. The real issue, therefore, is not age alone but awareness, exposure, and critical thinking. If we want to “save human eyes” from being misled, the focus should be on strengthening digital literacy across all generations,because misinformation doesn’t discriminate, it simply targets whoever is least prepared.
I agree that age 60+ year olds are more at risk of misinformation because sometimes, people can tell the wrong information to the 60+ and sometimes other people may have fallen for it too and are spreading the news. Also, AI can trick elderly people because some people have never seen AI before. They might think it's real and just like the first sentence, they could show it to another person and that person will show another person and it just keeps going on.
I agree with this statement because old people may get dementia and they may not hear the person correctly. Another reason for my view is that some old people are easy to manipulate because they might not remember what they said and they may think people who are good are bad. I just think 54 should be the limit of the oldest person to vote.
Why do you think 54 should be the limit?
I strongly agree with this statement because when people are at the age of 60+ they are at a higher risk of seeing information online and believing that information. For example, let's say a senior citizen is looking at a reel on Instagram or TikTok. They could be fooled by AI or some fake news and believe it. Another reason I think this is because when a senior citizen sees a reel or short on social media they can be at risk of seeing AI. Take the bunnies jumping on the trampoline as an example. Many people including kids got tricked thinking it was real but it was AI. My last reason is because some people ages 60+ could have bad problems with their mind and couldn't understand the world going on around them.
Hello Topical Talk, I think that this statement is slightly true because some 60+ might be tricked by the younger people, and might vote for someone that people don’t like. Or even someone that people detest, but also young people can vote for a candidate that others don’t like and that can cause upset people and anger. Still that doesn’t meet 40+ year olds don’t make a mistake because everyone make mistakes, because if we didn’t make mistakes the world would be boring but now one’s perfect so that won’t happen. If it does happen it will be in thousands of years.
I disagree with this statement because older people don't watch social media like TikTok, YouTube, and instagram. These apps contain ai videos and untrustful content, and they can trick younger people since they watch social media more than 60+ year olds. Older people are more mature than younger people, and they know more. Younger people are more persuaded into believing videos on social media than older people, so they might vote for the evil candidate running for president. Older people also watch more news than younger people so they know more about the world than younger people.
However, I can see why other people disagree with me because older people might have memory loss and other disabilities. They may fall for things easier since their brains are older. Scientists say older people fall for more things on social media than younger people, like scams. Older people like, 70-90 lose more of their critical thinking kills than 30-40 year olds. Older people can forget the things they learned throughout life. Younger people just started living it.
I agree with this statement because people that are older than 60+ years old have bad eyesight (just a few) and say someone put something AI that Kamala Harris got elected for president and then that 60+ year old goes to tell his/her friends and now almost everyone think that same thing. Also, AI now is really hard to tell from now that it has improved over the years. My third reason might be, that some old people can get tricked really easily and even without AI like someone just convincing them might lead to misinformation. However, younger kids (like us :) are aware of AI because we have experienced using AI like chatgpt but older people are not to aware about what is AI and what isn't AI. So, I agree that people 60+ might have a misinformation problem because of AI and because of people convincing them.
I disagree with this statement because some older voters are and can be intelligent. Another reason for my view is that older adults might even make their country a better place when they can vote and tell the world what they have to say. Younger voters might also use what they hear online as their "evidence" for why they wanted to pick the person they picked, when it is just fake news. But older voters would not listen to this fake news. Instead, they will go off of what the breaking news says.
I partly agree with this statement, and that’s due to the fact that some elderly citizens may face a greater risk of misinformation. Firstly, this is due to the fact that some elderly citizens may not have grown up with social media, and thus, they may not know how to identify false news on social media, especially if it’s coming from a trusted source.
Secondly, some elderly citizens may only get their news from a few sources, and thus, this false news may seem more believable. Although, this can also apply to the younger generation, misinformation can affect anyone.
I agree with the statement that older voters (aged 60+) are more at risk from misinformation and fake news than younger voters. One reason is that older people often use social media and the internet differently. They may rely more on information shared by friends or familiar websites, assuming it is true without checking the source. This can make them more likely to believe false or misleading content.
Another reason is that younger voters tend to be more familiar with digital technology and online platforms. They usually have more experience spotting fake news, comparing information from multiple sources, and identifying unreliable websites. Because of this, younger voters are often better at recognizing misinformation and avoiding being misled. Overall, older voters face a higher risk because they may be less aware of how misinformation spreads online and how to verify it effectively.
Actually, i think that it actually depends, wether its young or old people, and here's why:
First, elderly people:
For older people it depends on their life experience, if they spent their whole life believing anything, without checking if its true or false, or being really careful with any information they say and need to 100% sure that its true, so if they spent their life believing anything, then they will believe anything, but if they were careful, they're still going to be careful, but not always, when people get older, their brain start to be weaker, some elders even get "Alzheimer" (a disease that makes people forget important or anything instantly), which can make it hard for elders to not believe anything, they might also sometimes lose common sense, at least that's what i think.🙃
But for younger kids:
So again it depends, but not on their life experience, because they basically just started their actual life now, it's actually based on what they saw in their childhood, for example if their parents taught them to believe anything they see from whoever came from then they are going to believe anything they see when they start their life, because it's simply what their parents said to them, but if their parents taught them to be sure of every information they say because it can create rumors and then get back to you as big problems, then the kid is going to be careful with saying any information, but things doesn't always go as planned, as usual, some kids might act like they are trusted people, and trick kids easily and put them in problems.
That's it ,bye!👋🏻
I disagree with the statement that older voters are more at risk from misinformation than younger ones. I think the truth is that everyone, regardless of age, can fall for fake news if they don't know how to spot it.
One big problem is that fake news spreads everywhere, and sometimes it’s hard to tell what’s real. Younger people often spend more time on social media, where fake stories spread quickly. For example, there are ads, memes, or videos that look real, but they’re fake. Young people might not always know how to check the information before believing it.
But older people are not immune to misinformation either. They might trust things shared by friends or family, or even from newspapers or TV. For example, during the pandemic, many older people received misleading health advice through WhatsApp or emails.
A big problem is that fake news plays on emotions. It gets people angry or scared, making them want to share it more. Young people might share something because it's shocking, while older people might share it because it fits what they already believe.
The solution isn’t blaming one age group. We need to teach critical thinking skills to everyone. If schools and communities helped people of all ages understand how to spot fake news, they would be less likely to fall for it. More media literacy programs would also help people become better at spotting misinformation.
This way, everyone can be smarter about fake news and not get tricked as easily.
I partly agree with this statement because recent research has proven that older adults (65+) are more likely to believe and share false political "information". Yet a large meta analysis has proven that older adults are better at judging the truth vs. falsehood. The Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST) has proven that Generation Z is the most vulnerable to misinformation, they performed worse than every other generation, even Baby Boomers. Another reason for my view is the fact that heavy social media use pushes them to make surface-level judgements and rely on quick heuristics. Especially during crises like COVID when there was a flood of misinformation.
I disagree because younger voters are at the risk of being deceived. At that age, they are easily influenced by social media (especially because they are not guide), when the information dish out fake news, it will only affect the people who follow because, many of them don't bother to verify what they see but older people will have good understanding about news on elections. They prefer to read newspaper which they feel have verified information.
I agree with the statement because 60 year old voters did not have access to social media and internet growing up but younger voters grew up with it. Since technology is more advanced, the younger voters have a better understanding. They can easily decode and tell whether the news is real or fake. While older voters can not easily tell the fake and real apart and can be misled by this misinformation.
I agree with this statement because I believe that older people may see fake news and think that it is real. Fake news can come from social media, AI, friends and family. Fake News is not always bad, the spread of this information can be from a caring perspective: for example an article showing what could happen when a Prime Minister is elected, may not state that it is a prediction and not reality. If I see something in The News that my Nan would benefit from, I would tell her, but I may not know that it is fake. Historically The News has always been accurate and trustworthy, so the older generation may not see Fake News/Misinformation as as big of an issue as it is.
Unfortunately older people are at risk of some health concerns, such as dementia, hearing loss, vision loss and overall decline of their health. This can lead to further misunderstandings, such as misreading information, misunderstanding information or give them a false sense of hope, which is unfair.
Generally younger people have more access to social media and understand the concept of AI and how to differentiate fake news from real news, friends and family from a younger generation have a duty of care to make sure the older generations are protected and safe.
I don’t agree with the idea that older people are more likely to fall for misinformation than younger people. Fake news can affect anyone if they don’t know how to check whether something is true or not.
These days, false information spreads very fast and can be found almost everywhere. Younger people spend a lot of time on social media, where fake posts, videos, and memes can look real. Because of this, some young people may believe or share information without checking if it comes from a trusted source.
Older people can also be misled. Many of them trust messages sent by friends, family members, or familiar news sources. During the pandemic, for example, false health messages were widely shared through WhatsApp and emails, and many people believed them without questioning.
Fake news often works by targeting emotions. It can make people feel scared, angry, or shocked, which encourages them to share it quickly. Younger people might share something because it seems surprising, while older people might share it because it matches their beliefs.
Instead of blaming one age group, the real solution is education. Everyone should be taught how to think carefully about what they read and watch. If people of all ages learn how to identify fake news, it will be much harder for misinformation to spread.
Great insights
I agree with this statement because the ones who get misinformation and get hacked most often are children and elderly people. Another reason for my view is that many elderly people did not grow up using the internet or social media , so they get misinformation and are hacked easily because they may not have digital habits like fact checking.
For more information, children get hacked easily because of sharing private things or talking to strangers on social media.
To be clear, I see that older voters are at risk from misinformation because of AI being used wrongly or fake news on social media. For example in 2024, AI was used to clone a president’s voice in phone calls to trick people into not voting. This shows that if you are not used to this technology, it is very hard to tell what is a real person and what is a computer generated fake.
In conclusion, I believe we need to protect these two groups because scammers and fake news creators take advantage of their trust and their lack of experience with new technology ( AI ). 🅰️ℹ️
Hope you like my comment 🤗
hi
they two categories are of individuals but we are putting into consideration the both because they are all prom to misinformation with the following reasons
OLDER VOTERS: they mostly believe information that look very familiar and don't take longer time to check and access the information, secondly they believe information that sounds very threating without considering whether or not the information is from an accurate source sometimes they so time follow apps that are that are widely used and accept all information gotten from the app without proper vetting.
YOUNGER VOTERS: young voters visit sites like tiktok, Instagram, and other media sites, this makes them commonly exposed to misinformation because these are sites where people are free to post and make any type of comment and some times when people post any content they would easily believe it
secondly, the school sometimes do not teach how some media sites create negative in their lives.
i think that there is a higher chance of misinformation for older people because they might think that the fake things on social media are real because the people that post the videos push and push and push so the audiece watching the video will believe it. Also someone might have told someone else that knew an older person and told them but it could have been misinformation and you would be misleading someone or more than one person
I think that misinformation risk is not just about age.... It is about media literacy, platform design, emotional engagement and political identity.
Older voters aged 60 and above are often portrayed as being more vulnerable to misinformation and fake news than younger voters, due to digital literacy and less familiarity with online platforms designs leading to inability to identify sensational contents. However, this does not mean that young voters are not involved in misinformation. Younger people consume a far greater volume of online content and are, or may be fequently exposed to a more complex forms of misleading information such as misleading statistics and vital political memes that do no look like traditional fake news.
As a result, while older voters may be more susceptible to sharing overtly false information, younger voters can be equally vulnerable to more indirect and a greater forms of misinformation.
I partly agree that older voters are more at risk from misinformation and fake news than younger voters, but age is not the only factor.
Older people can be more vulnerable because many did not grow up with the internet. Social media posts, fake news websites and edited videos can look very convincing. Without strong digital skills, it is easy to believe false information. For example, an older voter might receive a WhatsApp message saying a politician has made a shocking decision and accept it as true without checking any reliable source.
Another reason is that older generations often trust traditional media more. If a TV channel or newspaper is biased, they may not question it. Some political groups and scammers also deliberately target older people with emotional or dramatic stories, knowing they are more likely to share them with friends and family.
Younger voters usually have more experience with technology. Many learn how to fact-check, compare sources and recognise clickbait headlines. A young person is more likely to search online to verify a claim before believing it.
Still, young people are not immune. They spend more time on social media where false stories spread quickly. Influencers, viral posts and memes can shape their opinions even when the information is inaccurate.
Overall, older voters may face higher risk because of lower digital literacy and greater trust in what they see. Nevertheless, misinformation affects all generations, and better education in critical thinking is needed for everyone.
I disagree with the statement because fake news affects everyone irrespective of age. Nowadays, all people especially youngsters often believe in fake news blindly without checking whether it's from the trusted source. Rumours and fake news always travel faster than truth because ,nowadays people often enjoy interesting fake news instead of listening to informative truth.
We can see clear real-life examples in our own society. People from all age groups now rely on AI tools, social media pages, and online forums for advice on health issues, medicines, and lifestyle problems. Sometimes, incorrect or incomplete information is provided, leading people to take the wrong medicine or follow unsafe practices. Such incidents show how misinformation can cause real damage, and they are not limited to older people alone.This shows how misinformation, when mixed with trust and urgency, can cause real harm to everyone.
Also, fake news secretly trigger emotions like fear, guilt, sadness, or even happiness, because they are designed to sound urgent and believable.When emotions are triggered, logic takes a back seat. Therefore, the real issue is not age, but awareness, digital literacy, and the habit of verifying information before believing or sharing it. This proves that misinformation is a societal problem, not an age-based one!
Yes, I do agree with the statement that was made. It stated "older voters (60+) are more at risk from misinformation and fake news than younger voters." People in the age group of 60+ may think whatever the internet tells the truth. They could fall for AI (Artificial Intelligence) that ties into aging and loss of eyesight and/or knowledge. Additionally, some AI videos include deep fakes, which can be realistic, manipulative, or persuasive videos and photos. The low graphing can uncover the fake news. In the lesson it was talking about, people can take just those parts and spread the misinformation to their community or people that are close and that don't really pay attention to the outside world. Also, my teammates and I had a discussion on the lesson about which age group is more likely to mislead misinformation. The majority of us said 60+ and gave some reasons on how realistic AI is, so they could fall for realistic AI-generated videos.
In conclusion, people of the age 60+ are more at risk for misinformation because of the risk of falling for AI-generated or false information.
Thanks for sharing your group's thinking on this topic @trustful_petal. If AI is so realistic, why do you think the older generation is more at risk of misinformation than younger people?
I agree with the statement, because old people often have memory problems, which can be a problem when voting, because of that they often believe what other people tell them that could lead to them believing in misinformation. Meanwhile young people are more likely to have a stronger opinion than older people, although younger people can be pressured into doing something so can older people. Old people were once young and they can be pressured into doing something just like young people.
Social media is the hotspot of misinformation since anyone can post anything. Young people may be more exposed to social media but, Older people can’t tell what is true on social media, if someone is spreading misinformation online about a corrupt candidate they could believe it and possibly vote for them. Since young people are online more they can tell what is fake and what is not. Older people can not tell what to believe in.
I believe that Old voters that are 60+ should not be able to vote, they could be a risk to the future of a country, state, or maybe even a city. Old people should not be allowed to vote
The risk of misinformation can really make people 60 and over more likely to believe fake news. I agree with the statement because most old people don't know about AI. This is ruining the algorithm of voting, most likely due to people abusing the real purpose of AI instead of helping you answer questions. AI has evolved from making videos that were simple to look at all the way to complicated videos like a cat on your Ring camera driving a tank.
Misinformation has been here on the planet for many years, but there is no way to stop its influence. People can take old people from the street, and show them a video of one president voting, and says, "if you vote for me you will get 100,000 dollars," and they may get fooled easily.
For these reasons, I believe the stakes of misinformation will get really high.
I agree with this statment because older people have problems with their brains or heads for example Dementia or Alzheimers which means that they can be easily tricked or forget the true info. Another reason for my veiw is that I'm sure that there are alot of people out there that wouldn't think twice about tricking another person into voting for the canidate they want to vote for because they are so selfish😡.
Thank You for reading my point of veiw.🤗
Have a nice day or evening.
😁
I believe that older people can be misled and have fake information. When you get older, your brain can age a bit faster than you, and so your brain will get old, not knowing the things you knew from the past. You can look at an AI video and think it is real enough to vote. People online can make other people focus on believing them, which can make the community worse. People can get information and move on. When I can vote, I will not believe lots of online things so I can help the community.
That is why I believe older people can be misled.
It's honestly wild how we can accidentally spread fake news just because it sounds like something we already agree with. You'd think being smart would stop us from getting tricked, but sometimes our brains are just really good at making excuses for things that 'feel' right. Since most of us get our news on social media now, we have a massive responsibility to stay skeptical. Even if we don't mean any harm, sharing something 'just in case' still helps a lie grow.
I've started trying to find at least one other source before I hit send, because it's way better to take a second to fact-check than to be the person who accidentally spreads a lie. It also makes me" wonder: if" we're all responsible for what we share, shouldn't we be learning more about this in school so we actually know how to sort the difference between a real fact and just a loud opinion?
At the end of the day, misinformation isn't just about the people making it-it's about how we handle it. Being 'smart' doesn't mean we're immune to lies; it just means we should be responsible enough to pause. If we all cared more about the truth than just getting likes, the internet would be a way better place.
I really like the point you are making about responsibility when sharing news @loved_antelope. You say you've started checking alternative sources before sending to someone else. How do you know when a social media post looks "real" or "fake"?
I don't think older people are more likely to fall for misinformation than young people. Anyone can be tricked if they don't know how to verify whether something is true or not. Fake news is spreading these days easily, and it's found almost everywhere. Young people spend a lot of time on social media, where fake posts, videos, and memes can appear to be true. As a result,
some young people might believe or share information without verifying whether it comes from a trusted source or not. Older people can be tricked too. Many people trust messages from friends, relatives, or familiar news sources. During the pandemic, for instance, fake health information spread a lot through WhatsApp and emails, and many people believed it without questioning. Fake news usually relies on emotions. It can make people feel scared, angry or shocked, which makes them want to share it quickly. Young people might share something because it's surprising, and older people might share something because it agrees with what they believe. Rather than pointing fingers at one group of people, the solution to the problem is education. Everyone should be taught to think carefully about what they read and watch. They need good platforms to develop their skill like the Topical Talk festival, the Skill Builder program. If people of all ages are taught to identify fake news, it will be much more difficult for misinformation to spread.
i agree with you on the importance of education when it comes to the information we consume regardless of the channel. even though it is the fact, that young people are easily carried away by the things they see on social media, it is not only them that will need education on how to effectively use this medium of information. the older voters too need education as contents like political news are being tranfered to social media. they both need that awareness on how to sieve out fake news and where to go on social media if you want something reliable. older voters can't shake off how important it is to get updated on politics as soon as possible via social media. they should embrace it.
In my opinion, I believe that elderly people are more vulnerable to misleading data than younger votes.
I think this because AI is being used more on platforms like Social Media and Instagram and is becoming reality and can trick older people into believing misinformation during election campaigns. Scientists say, that AI is advancing day by day, but context creators use it as a ‘ manipulating tool’ to get age 60+ to believe that they are veracious , but they are inaccurate. Also, elderly people aren’t used to all this technology shooting at them each day online, so then they might get pressured to go with what a certain group of people are saying than younger voters, therefore they end up following some misleading information.
That is everything from me!
I disagree because... elder aren't connected the most to the internet most especially this time during the new era of ai
so this justifies that young people are mostly manipulated
I disagree with this statement because I think that 18 to 19 year old people will use social media more so they mistake it for real information. Another reason for my opinion is because they spend much more time on their devices and now AI is now better so it can easily trick people. People may disagree with me because most of the time 60+ year old people spend most of their free time lying down looking at their phone so they might be tricked by misinformation.
I disagree with this statement because if you are 60+ then you would be very wise and already know all of life's tips and tricks. Another reason for my view is when my grandma was voting she went on TikTok and saw a rude meme about the person she was going to vote for but she reported the user.
i disagree with this statement because that people that are 60+ are really sensitive and can realise nearly instantly and for this reason i said this is that the old people might of seen fake news before and got use to it.people and youngsters can try to trick them since they think there brains can some times rot and not remember anything but they can.
Thanks for your comment. Which parts are facts (that you can prove with evidence) and which parts are opinion?
I agree with this statement because some people are not aware of what is actually happening around the world and what is true and what you should believe. There are scammers now a days that are taking people's money and people keep on putting fake information about people like friends and family. This needs to stop because it has happened to my family and people around the world many times.
How do you think we can best prevent this from happening?
News are channeled through various media like, newspapers, magazines, TV, social media, etc. But who goes to where for information? is the main issue, because, these channels do not have the same level of trust when it comes to the accuracy of the information they publish. Information on newspapers are well edited before consumption as well as they broadcast on TV. but that on Whatsapp and Tiktok hardly go through any form of editing to ensure accuracy. Political news posted on social media suffer this fate, and the far reaching impact we can hardly quantify, especially in countries where emotions are still boiling. Sixty year olds from experience know that newspapers are more reliable when it comes to accurate information on politics, and if there is a foul play, there is someone to hold accountable. unlike the younger people who are carried away by the vibes on social media, and may assume on important political post whose facts may not be true. in fact, they may not have the patience to compare a content with other sources before concluding. this is why I DISAGREE that older voters 60+ are more at risk with misinformation than younger voters. they are more patient, calculative, and with better sense of judgment in terms of the information they consume and believe than the younger voters.
Hello.
I partly disagree with this statement because misled by fake news is more about digital awareness than age. While some older voters (not all) may trust they read online, many younger people also vulnerable because misinformation spraeds on social media platforms they use everyday.
Another view for my is that I have learned in social studies that media literacy means questioning sources, not just believing headlines. For example, short videos or emotional posts are designed to get quick reactions, and usually teenagers can share them immediately without checking if they're true. I have personally false news spread faster than corrections in class and in group chats. This shows that everyone, regardless of age, can be misled if they didn't think critically.
Bye
I agree with this statement as people who are older tend to believe more. For example, i have a nan who is 74, and she always sends me AI pictures from Facebook and I’m not sure if she thinks they’re real, but AI is definitely something that is used a lot today.
I think that older people have higher chances to get brain problems or mental issues, and that affects what they believe and their memory.
For example, dementia.
1. It stops the brain functioning at times.
2. It changes your ability to follow regular daily routines or other things.
3. Short term memory loss or confusion about simple tasks.
Or Alzheimer’s.
1. It is an irreversible brain disorder that affects memory and brain functioning much like dementia.
2. Some early signs are forgetting things like names or places.
This proves that older peoples’ brains aren’t as understanding (even though they are old) because brain disorders or diseases are more common in ages 60+.
Thank you.
Thanks @charming_television for sharing the example with your Nan. Did you find evidence about a higher risk from misinformation and fake news in people with Alzheimers and dementia that you can share with us? And let us know whether your Nan thinks the AI pictures are real - you could ask her this weekend!
I agree with this statement because in the world today almost everything is been done by AI , from videos, to pictures and so on. Nowadays nothing is natural and every where everybody is making use of AI. aged 60+ are more likely at risk to misinformation than other people. With the help of AI things that are not real will be made to look very real and believable. Things that people post on social media are usually not real. People almost everywhere are abusing AI like spreading fake news and people who cannot tell the difference and because of this people can change their mindset on who they want to vote for. young people who look deeper into the world are likely not to believe fake news, than people who cannot differentiate real and fake news. 60+ are not used to gadgets like teenagers who are always on their phones and they would not be able to know who is saying the truth and who is telling a lie.
Misinformation in vote
THIS IS A FALSE NEW WHICH AFFECT PEOPLE DECISION
It manipulate people during a democratic election eg if now you see a video of a person running of the election and it makes you to be 😨afraid or😠angry it will not allow you ❔question if it true or false and the comment it bring more intention
AI plays a big part in manipulating people decision because it is used to makes video that look real but are not and it make election not fair . People don't understand the difference MANIPULATION and INFLUENCE
Manipulation is lying to people just of vote
Influence is telling people the true and doing not of vote
THANK YOU👋👋
We agree with this statement because our elderly community come from a time of where mis information wasn't really a thing. Therefore when our parents or grandparents are on TikTok or Facebook or any type of social media, they can be exposed to AI. AI is prone to a lot of misunderstood information and fake videos and a lot of the time you are scrolling, you will come across an AI video and will question if it was real or not. So as a result of this question what do you think about this statement?
I disagree with this statement because I think teenagers are the ones who have the most risk of finding and believing false information or some news that lacks information because they are using social media all day, which is where there are the most hoaxes nowadays. Older people, not having social media, are less informed and every time they receive news they will believe it because they will not think it is a lie or a hoax.
Taking technology and physiological factors, I completely agree with that statement because this is the lack of awareness among older voters about the algorithm-driven nature of the digital platform. Youth generally have a better understanding of how online platform algorithms operate,, whereas many elderly individuals often fail to realise that they have become confined within a filter bubble, where they are repeatedly exposed to attractive or emotionally appealing content, rather, than accurate and reliable information.
Another reason for my view is that elderly people are often more sensitive to moral panic —including content. Since they can't to be more concerned about social values, traditions and moral stability. As a result fake news hurts their emotions more, and when emotions are imposed on logic,, then the possibility of misinformation in the elderly also increases.
Thank you💕
I disagree with this statement because misinformation doesn't check your age before it spreads- it targets whoever isn't paying close attention. Younger voters spend a lot of time on fast- moving platforms like Tiktok, Instagram, and Youtube, where Rumours can go viral in minutes. If someone doesn't check the source, people can believe something false without realising it.
Another reason for my view is that older voters often rely on traditional news sources, which usually have stricter rules about honesty. |Meanwhile younger people might trust influencers friends or short videos that look professional but can be completely misleading. In today's world, the real risk isn't age - it's how much attention people uses to check what they are reading.
So overall, misinformation isnt a problem just for the young or old but everyone. The smartest we can do is to learn to question what we see, wherever it comes from.
In today's world, it is a big mistake to think that only people over 60 fall for fake news; because almost everyone is now addicted to their gadgets, misinformation has become a trap for every age group. This issue becomes very serious when we look at how it's used to target successful people of Indian origin who are running for high offices in
their countries.
For example, leaders like Rishi Sunak (the former UK Prime Minister), Kamala Harris (US Vice President), and Nikki Haley (former US Ambassador) have all faced waves of social media attacks. Some people spread "racist rumors" and misinformation, claiming they are "not fit to lead" or "not loyal" simply because of their Indian heritage. They use fake stories to make voters doubt these leaders, arguing that they belong to another country rather than the one they are serving. By connecting our daily gadget addiction with these unfair attacks, we can see that misinformation isn't just about being "old"but it's a tool used to spread bias and keep people from seeing the truth about a candidate's hard work and talent.
Exited to hear other's perspectives!!!
I disagree with this statement because I believe that the younger generation is more open to the online world, and many young people learn about what is happening globally from social media platforms, rather than watching the news or reading magazines/newspapers, for example. Research proves that around 75-80% of people aged 16-24 use social media like tik Tok and instagram as their ways of being informed about the current news stories. Over 2 in 5 (42.9%) young people get their news daily from social media, with 21% relying mainly on tik tok. However, people aged over 60 are informed mostly by broadcasted news channels or newspapers instead.
Therefore, because of this, teenagers and young adults are more vulnerable to fake news and misinformation because so many things seen online are wrong or fake but the majority of viewers accept and follow them. There is always the risk of getting the wrong information from the wrong sources, and I believe younger people are affected most by this.
In conclusion, I disagree with the statement because older voters rely on more traditional ways of being informed, for example news broadcasting, like I mentioned before. However, the younger population is on social media daily and is definitely affected more.
Thanks for sharing. Backing up your ideas with evidence can make a great argument. Could you provide some sources for your information?
Yes - BBC bitesize provides a lot of statistics regarding these topics.
Yes - BBC bitesize provides a lot of statistics regarding these topics.
Hello! My name is Illuminated Owl and today I will give my opinion about misinformation. This week we have been discussing about the perfect age for voting, but also about the different ideas that people have about politics that can influence on us; given by our family, friends, and many other relatives. Also, we know that all these opinions are important because they help us to see others' beliefs, so that we can be more informed and have more knowledge about different parties when voting. But, moreover, this helps us to accept different ideas.
Opinions are good when voting so that we fully know about different themes that can be important; but always, data must be real and give true stories because, that way, it is more fair to everyone.
The problem is that, sometimes, these informations can be false and lie just for foul play and for publicity, so some parties can obtain more voters. Usually, this kind of stories comes to us by the social media, and unfortunately, the youth is the first one to take the bait believing them. This can not happen, someone that is voting for the first time should not be fool that way and should receive the best information to be ready for choosing, and confident about their election.
But not only this, misinformation is also a way to change people's minds by lies, adding false information or even by eliminating some of it, changing the story drastically. Also, misinformation can harm our feelings and make us more depressed.
For this reason, my opinion about misinformation is that, if it didn't exist, voting would be easier to everyone.
I agree with the statement. While younger "digital natives" grew up instinctively identifying internet "tricks," older voters (60+) often lack the same intuitive filter for sophisticated algorithms and deepfakes. Data from the 2020 and 2024 election cycles suggests that seniors are statistically more likely to share misinformation on platforms like Facebook—sometimes up to seven times more than younger cohorts. Because this demographic is often the most consistent at the polls, their vulnerability to "fake news" can significantly shift election results and shape national policy.
However, the risk isn't just about technical skill; it’s about the "Echo Chamber" effect. Older voters may rely on a narrow circle of traditional news sources, which can reinforce confirmation bias. If these sources spread "half-truths," it becomes difficult to encounter opposing perspectives. Conversely, while Gen Z is tech-savvy, we often consume "snackable" news on TikTok so hastily that we forget to verify the source before engaging.
To bridge this generational gap, could schools implement "reverse-mentoring" programs? Having students teach their grandparents how to spot bots and verify sources could strengthen community ties and our democracy simultaneously.
Should digital literacy be a mandatory, graded part of every school’s curriculum to ensure all generations are protected from manipulation?
I agree with the statement that older voters (aged 60+) are more at risk from misinformation and fake news than younger voters. Many older adults have less familiarity with online platforms, which makes it harder for them to recognize misleading headlines or manipulated content. They also rely more on closed circles of information such as Facebook, TV, or WhatsApp, where false stories can spread quickly without challenge. Strong partisan leanings add to the risk, since older voters are more likely to share material that supports their political views even if it isn’t accurate.
By contrast, younger voters tend to be more comfortable navigating digital spaces and are often more aware of misinformation. Yet they face their own challenges: fast-moving platforms like TikTok and Instagram amplify viral falsehoods and recommendation systems can trap them in repetitive feeds of the same ideas. Both groups are vulnerable, but older voters are at greater risk overall because of weaker online navigation skills, stronger partisan bias, and reliance on closed information networks.
I've been thinking about this alot since my last post and after reading the other viewpoints , I've actually changed my mind or my perspective. I know disagree with this statement but do you know why ? I'll tell you .
Ok first , the main reason for my shift is that fake news is becoming much harder to spot because of AI . For example,I've searched and found that in the last US elections there were fake audio recordings of policians that sounded exactly like them , since younger people are on tiktok and Instagram all day , we see these clips constantly. It's almost impossible to tell what's real and what's fake , even if we are good at using our phones.
Another reason is that older people stick to few trusted news sources like TV , while we get our informations from influencers who don't always check if the story is true . I realized that being online more doesn't mean we are safer , it just means we see more lies . This is why I think younger voters might actually be at a higher risk now . Thanks for everyone who wrote a comment
With this point of view and persuaded me at the end and also thank you topical talk for making us share our ideas and persuade each other . What do you think ? Maybe you will also change your mind .
I disagree with the statement. One reason is that older voters often have more life experience and have lived through many political changes, which can make them more skeptical of sudden or extreme claims. They may rely on traditional sources like newspapers and more trusted tv shows.
Another reason for my view is that young voters are more influenced by peer pressure and memes often getting their information from Instagram and TikTok, but older people will stick to resources trusted for years.
An example was when the covid 19 started many young people believed much false information but adults didn't.
I kinda disagree with that because young people are mostly associated and are more on social media now, which can lead to a lot more of misinformation. At the same time, over 60a getting used to tech aren't going to know much about the Internet, so they too can be tricked.
I partly agree with the statement that older voters aged 60 and above are more at risk from misinformation and fake news than younger voters. One reason for this is that many older people did not grow up using the internet and social media, so they may be less familiar with how easily information can be manipulated online. Fake news is often presented in a professional and convincing way, using emotional language, dramatic headlines, or images taken out of context, which can make it difficult to tell what is true. Another reason is that older voters are more likely to trust information shared by friends, family members, or community groups, especially on messaging apps, without checking the original source. This trust is not a weakness, but it can be exploited by those spreading false information. However, it is important to recognise that younger voters are not immune to misinformation either. Younger people may be better at using technology, but they are often exposed to large amounts of information very quickly, which can lead to accepting claims without proper fact-checking. Algorithms on social media platforms also tend to reinforce existing views, making misinformation harder to challenge for all age groups. Overall, while older voters may face specific risks due to lower digital familiarity, misinformation is a wider problem that affects voters of all ages, and improving media literacy for everyone is the most effective solution.
I agree with this statement that elderly citizens are prone to misinformation than the younger ones.
I think misinformation is not based on age but how you process information and how much you question what you are being given.
Young voters are growing up surrounded by a fast-scrolling digital world that is filled with short videos, trending posts, and messages that go viral. Sometimes, things that are highly engaging, whether good or bad, may go around very quickly before anyone checks to see if they are true or false. So, popularity sometimes looks like truth.
Older people have a different problem. They may have grown up thinking that the newspaper, television, or a person they know personally are reliable sources of information. They will possibly think that a source they know is reliable, even if that source, unknown to them, is passing on wrong information.
False information works not because of the truth of its content, but because it seems familiar and reliable.
I partially agree with this statement because older voters are more likely to fall for misleading and false information due to lower digital skills and other priorities.
A study has shown that about 50% of people over the age of 65 struggle to identify real againt fake information online, while only 30% of younger adults face the same challenge. This makes it harder for elder voters to distinguish fake news on social media during election times.
However, older voters tend to rely more on traditional media like TV and newspapers which are generally more trustworthy sources during elections. On the other hand, younger voters, who are more active on social media platforms, face risks from algorithms that show them content designed to peronalise what they see on those platforms, for example, content that matches their political views, often spreading misleading or biased information.
A recent study has shown that 53% of young voters, (18-24) without knowing, have shared false content on social media platforms during the election period, even though they are more familiar with technology.
Aditionally older voters often dont adjust their priorities to reflect the issues needed in the modern world, such as advancements in AI and technology, which can leave them more vunerable to outdated or misleading information that aligns with their past concerns.
In conclusion, may factors effect wether elder people over the age of 60 should vote so we cannot rech a final definite conclusion straight away as it requires many different opinions and views to be analysed and considered.
Thanks!
Great contribution, charming_strategy! I love how you bring external research into the conversation to help support your argument. Would you mind sharing the sources you referred to please? It's always great to cite sources where possible! Thanks!
Hello Ella,
Thank you for your feedback and in the future I will always try to share my sources.
The first source that I used was a collective statement based on the information/figures given from the OECD Truth Quest Survey and other related research on this topic.
As for the second source I used data from YouGov, an international survey and research company. They track public opinions and online behaviour to create valuable data including the statistics I have presented in my work.
I hope that answers your comment and I look forward to sharing more of my opinions in the future (while also supporting it with their relevant sources).
Thank you!
I disagree with this statement. In my opinion, the percentage of people who get misleading or misinformation is young voters because old voters got information and experience from almost their whole life. On the other hand, young voters haven't had much life experience, so they are barely able to identify who is good, or who will make the country better.
I agree with the statement that elderly people are often seen as more vulnerable to misinformation, but I believe that the issue is not really about age. Instead, it depends on how people process information and how critically they question what they receive.
Young voters are growing up in a fast-moving digital world filled with short videos, viral posts, reels, and trending content. Information spreads extremely quickly, and emotional or entertaining content often gains attention faster than verified facts. Because of this, popularity can sometimes be mistaken for truth, and younger people may share information without considering whether it is accurate and true.
Older people face a different challenge. Many grew up trusting newspapers, Television or family individuals are as reliable sources of information. This long-standing habit of trust can make them more vulnerable when false information is shared through familiar platforms or by people they know. Even if the source seems trustworthy, the information itself may still be incorrect.
Misinformation succeeds not because it is true, but because it feels familiar and believable. Factors such as limited digital literacy, confirmation bias, and the tendancy of trust information that supports existing beliefs affect people of all ages. Therefore, the real solution is not to blame one generation, but to strengthened critical thinking, media literacy, and fact checking skills across all age groups.
I think that in this circumstance I believe that people who are 60+ can believe misleading information more than any other age . this is because they are more gullible because they are a bit old school and don't know much about new types of technology like AI.I think AI the most because AI is improving every day and getting harder to recognise and it might be harder for the older people tell witch on is real or not . younger people are in the trend so they tell the diffrence
thanks for listing ;]
I agree with this statement because people that are older than 60 could watch an A.I video of a false statement about who they are going to vote for and then choose another person because of the A.I video. Some people might disagree with me because they think they won't fall for the the A.I video. Another reason why I think people over 60 shouldn't vote is because the older the people get the more stuff they have issues with like their eye site and hearing so they might fall for a video. But if they were like 26-40 they will be able to remember who and what to write but sometimes they do have bad eye site, memory loss, and hearing problems.