This post was written by a student. It has not been fact checked or edited.


Hi topical talkers, my standpoint is on how nepotism affects people. As we all know, nepotism is the act of giving unfair treatment to others by showing favoritism towards family and friends. This poses a significant threat to those who are not favored, as it can make them feel sad, uncomfortable, undervalued, unloved, and useless. Consequently, it leads to negative feelings towards those who receive preferential treatment.

Most people claim they engage in nepotism because they want to help out their family or friends, as it may be the only assistance they can provide. However, they tend to forget that by doing so, they are denying other individuals the chance to progress and gain employment opportunities.

Nepotism can also affect people in a positive way. There are instances when a person is highly qualified and has exhausted all possible means to secure a job, but remains unsuccessful. After enduring significant effort, the person may start losing hope, until suddenly a family member or a friend offers them a job based on their qualifications. In such circumstances, nepotism can be seen as a positive factor that helped the individual.

The practice of nepotism is prevalent in businesses, politics, schools, sports, religion, and other fields. In fact, nepotism can even be observed within households when a parent chooses to favor one child over others, which often leads to disputes among siblings. Personally, I believe that people should be treated equally and given fair opportunities. Now, over to you, topical talkers: How do you think nepotism affects people?

Comments (10)

You must be logged in with Student Hub access to post a comment. Sign up now!

  • Of course it affects greatly First, society, where the person who is biased towards nepotism is a hated person, and also his dealings with nepotism can grow with people also in the same system, and thus corruption will spread widely and poverty will also spread. For that job, but among these people is the director's relative, and of course the director chose his relative at that time. All the young people who applied for the job will not qualify, and they will sit at home without a job, and unemployment will increase, and thus poverty will spread.

  • I agree because... if nepotism is practiced,it will affect us both negatively and positively.
    Negatively,it can lead to underdevelopment in some areas and families because people who have jobs will only base on developing their areas and families by providing jobs to only relatives leaving other people jobless and undeveloped which affects them so much.
    Positively,it can lead to development in areas where it is practiced because these people will aim at developing their areas. It will also help family members who do not have jobs to get employed.

  • How does mediation affect people?
    By providing assistance or jobs to relatives who may not have the full qualifications for this job, for example, poverty will spread in society and layers of people who work and have status in society and people who do not have work will emerge in spite of that. Having qualifications for this job, unemployment will spread among people, and there will be laziness in the performance of the relatives of the person who hired them in their work, and there are many negatives, and corruption will spread in society.

    1. Mediation, when used appropriately and in line with ethical principles, can have positive effects on individuals and society. Mediation is a process of facilitated negotiation or conflict resolution, where a neutral third party helps disputing parties communicate, find common ground, and reach mutually acceptable solutions.

      The positive effects of mediation include:

      Conflict resolution: Mediation can help resolve disputes and conflicts in a peaceful and constructive manner. It provides a platform for parties to express their concerns, understand each other's perspectives, and work together to find mutually satisfactory resolutions. By addressing conflicts early and effectively, mediation can prevent escalation and promote healthier relationships.

      Empowerment and participation: Mediation empowers individuals to take an active role in resolving their own conflicts. It allows them to express their needs and interests, be heard, and actively participate in shaping the outcome. This can enhance feelings of autonomy, self-determination, and ownership over the resolution process, leading to more sustainable and satisfactory outcomes.

      Preserving relationships: Unlike adversarial approaches such as litigation, mediation focuses on collaborative problem-solving and maintaining relationships. Mediation fosters open communication, empathy, and understanding between the parties involved, which can help preserve important personal or professional connections. This is particularly beneficial in situations where ongoing relationships are desired or necessary.

      Cost and time efficiency: Mediation can be a more cost-effective and efficient alternative to traditional legal processes. It often takes less time than going to court, reduces legal expenses, and provides an opportunity for swift resolution. This can be particularly beneficial for individuals who want to resolve their disputes in a timely and cost-conscious manner.

      Creative and customized solutions: Mediation allows for flexible and creative solutions that are tailored to the specific needs and interests of the parties involved. It encourages brainstorming and exploring alternative options beyond legal remedies, fostering innovative and mutually beneficial outcomes that may not be available through litigation.

      It is important to note that the negative effects you mentioned, such as nepotism, corruption, and spreading laziness, are not inherent to the mediation process itself. They are behaviors and issues that can occur in any decision-making or employment context, regardless of whether mediation is involved. When mediation is conducted with transparency, impartiality, and adherence to ethical standards, it can mitigate such negative impacts.

      Ultimately, the effectiveness of mediation and its impact on individuals and society depends on the quality of the process, the skills and neutrality of the mediator, and the willingness of the parties to engage in good faith.

  • Cons of Nepotism:

    Reduced productivity, morale, and engagement
    Special treatment
    Reduced employee development
    Increased turnover
    Poor corporate culture
    Reduced diversity
    Worse personal relationships
    Potential lawsuits
    Leads to a Toxic Workplace,
    When employees spot nepotism, they feel undervalued and uncomfortable. This is because favoritism comes into play, and the employees feel low at work. Moreover, employees constantly fear that any action they take will be reported to the manager without them knowing about it.

    1. You are correct in highlighting the negative consequences of nepotism in the workplace. Nepotism, which refers to favoritism shown to relatives or close associates in employment or other areas, can have detrimental effects on both individuals and the overall work environment. Some of the cons you mentioned include:

      Reduced productivity, morale, and engagement: When employees perceive that promotions and opportunities are based on personal relationships rather than merit or qualifications, it can lead to a decline in motivation, productivity, and overall morale. This can create a sense of unfairness and disengagement among employees.

      Special treatment: Nepotism often involves providing preferential treatment to family members or close associates, which can create a perception of unequal treatment. This can breed resentment and a sense of injustice among other employees, affecting teamwork and collaboration.

      Reduced employee development: By favoring family members or close associates, organizations may overlook other talented individuals who could contribute to the growth and development of the company. This can result in a lack of diverse perspectives and limit opportunities for professional growth and advancement for deserving employees.

      Increased turnover: When employees perceive that promotions and opportunities are based on nepotism rather than merit, it can lead to increased dissatisfaction and a higher likelihood of turnover. This can be detrimental to the organization, as it may lose valuable employees and face challenges in retaining talent.

      Poor corporate culture: Nepotism can create a toxic work environment characterized by favoritism, mistrust, and reduced morale. It can undermine teamwork, collaboration, and open communication, leading to a negative corporate culture that impacts overall organizational performance.

      Reduced diversity: Nepotism can hinder efforts to foster diversity and inclusion in the workplace. When opportunities are limited to a select group of individuals based on personal connections, it can exclude individuals from different backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives.

      Potential lawsuits: In some cases, nepotism can lead to legal issues, particularly if it violates anti-discrimination or equal employment opportunity laws. Employees who feel discriminated against or overlooked due to nepotism may take legal action, which can result in financial and reputational consequences for the organization.

      Addressing nepotism requires organizations to promote fairness, transparency, and merit-based decision-making. Implementing clear policies and procedures for recruitment, promotion, and advancement, as well as providing opportunities for professional development and growth for all employees, can help mitigate the negative impacts of nepotism.

      Thank you for raising these concerns

  • In my opinion nepotism is like a double edged sword. It affects people in both good and bad ways. To the special treated it affects them in a good way. WHY? Because they skip the part of having to work hard to get to where they are because it has already been handed to them by their parents. And it affects the deprived in a bad way. WHY? Because he or she has been denied of a position he or she has worked hard for. This all balls down to one thing, that nepotism affects people in a bed way than it affects them in a good way.

  • Well, Nepotism can have a negative impact on people because it can lead to unfair treatment, lack of diversity, and a lack of merit-based opportunities. It can create a culture of favoritism, where people are promoted or given opportunities based on who they know rather than their skills or qualifications. This can lead to resentment and a lack of trust within the workplace, and can also limit the potential of talented individuals who are not part of the inner circle.

  • Of course nepotism affects people in some aspects of life such as:
    1. Job performance: owners of organizations can show nepotism by:
    favoring other workers: in some organizations the owners often show nepotism by treating some workers nicely and treating other workers wickedly and that can greatly affect job performance.
    In some cases, favoritism can be subtle and not easily detectable, but nepotism is usually more clear to some people. Unfair treatment of favoring some employees over other persons can have a negative impact on morale and job performance, where as nepotism often results in corruption and nepotistic behavior.

  • From my point of view that Nepotism refers to the practice of favoring relatives or friends, often in the context of employment or the distribution of resources, based on personal relationships rather than merit or qualifications. It can have various effects on individuals and civil society, which I will outline below:

    Effects of Nepotism on Individuals:
    1. Unfair Treatment: Nepotism undermines the principles of fairness and equal opportunity. It can result in qualified individuals being overlooked or excluded from opportunities, while less qualified or deserving individuals are given preferential treatment solely based on their familial or personal connections.
    2. Reduced Motivation and Morale: When individuals witness nepotism in their organization or society, it can lead to demotivation and reduced morale. The perception of a lack of fairness and meritocracy can discourage hard work and discourage individuals from pursuing their full potential.
    3. Limited Growth and Innovation: Nepotism can stifle innovation and limit the growth of individuals and organizations. By prioritizing personal relationships over competence and expertise, organizations may miss out on fresh perspectives and diverse ideas that could lead to greater success and progress.
    4. Diminished Trust and Social Cohesion: Nepotism erodes trust within society and undermines social cohesion. It creates a perception of an unequal playing field and fosters cynicism and resentment among those who are excluded or disadvantaged due to nepotistic practices.

    Pros and Cons of Nepotism in Building Civil Society:

    1. Loyalty and Trust: Appointing individuals with close relationships to positions of power may lead to a higher level of loyalty and trust within a network. Family members or close friends may have a shared vision and common goals, which can promote collaboration and effective decision-making.
    2. Continuity and Stability: Nepotism can ensure continuity and stability within organizations or institutions. Family members may have a vested interest in the long-term success of an organization, which can lead to greater commitment and dedication.
    3. Efficient Communication: Personal relationships can facilitate efficient communication and decision-making processes. Family members may have a deep understanding of each other's strengths and weaknesses, enabling faster and more effective coordination.

    1. Lack of Competence and Meritocracy: Nepotism often disregards competence and merit in favor of personal connections. This can result in the appointment of individuals who may lack the necessary skills and qualifications, leading to ineffective leadership and decision-making.
    2. Limited Diversity and Inclusion: Nepotism tends to perpetuate existing power structures and can hinder the inclusion of individuals from diverse backgrounds. This can result in a lack of diverse perspectives and a failure to address the needs and interests of all members of society.
    3. Weakening of Institutions: Nepotism weakens the institutional fabric of civil society. It erodes public trust in institutions and can undermine their legitimacy and effectiveness. It may also discourage talented individuals from participating in public life, leading to a loss of human capital and expertise.

    In conclusion, while nepotism may provide some short-term benefits in terms of loyalty and trust, its negative impacts on fairness, motivation, growth, trust, and social cohesion make it detrimental to the building of a strong civil society. Building a society based on meritocracy, equal opportunity, and transparency is crucial for fostering innovation, inclusivity, and sustainable development.

  • This is how nepotism affects people in my own opinion.
    If a person wants to start a business and want it to be successful and he hires a family member that isn’t qualified for the position he/she could make mistakes that can cause the business to lose profits and be in debt . This might cause the owner of the business to sell his personal assets to cover the debt. Probably the person who was denied the job can help the business make more profits.

  • I believe that nepotism affects people in all aspects and fields.
    But the most pervasive negative effect is missed opportunities at the hands of many deserving and qualified people
    What is your opinion ?