Older or younger lawmakers?
In America, Joe Biden is the oldest US president in history at 79 years old. The previous American president, Donald Trump, was also in his seventies – and the average age of the core US government is around 60 years old.
In contrast, Norway has the highest number of young politicians in the world – with 13.6% of their government under the age of 30.
Over to you!
- What might the good things be about having a government made up of older people? What might the bad things be?
- What might the good things be about having a government made up of younger people? What might the bad things be?
- What’s the perfect age for a president? Why?
Tell us your thoughts in the comments below. Don’t forget to let others know what you think by replying directly to their comment.
Having an aged government isn't such a bad thing but there is much controversy in their mode of thinking. Sometimes they believe doing things the same old way works best but it's not the same everytime is it. I mean no harm when I say we teenagers or we young people love controversy it's our way of life to be honest and the fact that we have never even been given the chance to show that we can change the world isn't really fair. In my opinion the perfect age for a president should be ranging between thirty to forty years old, well that is because I think that that age range is still is the area of young and old they still want to be involved with recent happenings. A good idea will be a young leader with an aged jury don't you think so at least all age groups could participate in politics.
Yes! I agree with you , I also think old and young people can run as the government. It's unfair for younger people to be the Government or President because people doubt us. People just think all young people are the same, I see why they say It . I still think they got it all wrong, they think It's just reckless decisions but it's not. As a young Person who can make smart choices, I can say that people are wrong about us. I think we have an advantage,
Young people are controversial and are into Socializing and Politics. I say we can get the Job done. I agree with the Age part too, anything is possible, You can do anything if you put your mind to it. I think that was the point you were trying to make.
Can you give an example of a young person in a leadership role?
I really understand and agree with what you said so I just had to reply! Yes mostly younger people are always in some type of drama these days, but somewhere in the U.S there's people who stays out of trouble. Younger people may not have any experience, but with a aged jury in the background thats all they need.
I disagree because... you make no sense i think that the age of a government worker should be 25-30 is the right age that a worker should be is but the age of retiring is 50-75
Can you explain why?
First, every country must have a just president in order to manage its internal and external affairs. A just president does not have a specific age and must have political experience in people’s conditions. Some prefer that the president be old because they believe that he has old knowledge and wisdom in releasing justice between People and not to differentiate between them and the president who is old has bad things about the country first: his difficulty in getting on the field, secondly, his preoccupation with his old age and the diseases of his old age.
And some prefer young people and believe that young people have strength and courage, and also that the president is a young man who has bad things. First: the difficulty of balancing matters and judging old minds. Second: rushing to unite the decision of the state
And I prefer that the president be of a suitable age for the position of president, and that he be just and judge among the people
It is good for the ruler of the state to have wisdom and a high understanding. In this way, the rulers are chosen. We agree well that old people are knowledgeable and experienced in the affairs of the state, but it is possible that when a man reaches old age and becomes old, he cannot bear the pressure of work and the responsibility that falls On his shoulders, and we must give the opportunity to the youth group so that they can take their right to rule, express their opinion and deliver the message of the youth, as is the case with us in the President of the State of Palestine, he is over eighty years old and is still in the presidency and they could not replace him with the youth group, but at the time This is why we have advanced minds. These minds must be exploited in the development of the state. This service and treasures must be consumed correctly, but the age of this president cannot be less than 30 years, because the age of 30 is the age of adulthood at which a person can differentiate right from wrong, so this category must be given its right in judgment
Can you give evidence of why people under the age of 30 would not be able to govern and lead?
Because the age of less than 30 years is considered adolescence, whether early or late adolescence, a person cannot control himself until he controls a country, and the first to rule for this young man is emotions, so his emotions at this stage are unstable and intense emotions
young man.....or perhaps young woman!
1- The good thing is that young people are educated and will not make mistakes, because they have exhortation and wisdom and they have experience. 1- Or the negative thing, which is that there are great leaders of the world among them who did not advance with the progress of the world and did not develop. 2- The good thing is that young people have a modern and technological mind and they will be strong 2- As for the negative thing, they will make mistakes because they are in a hurry 3-40 because it is the age of safety and maturity, it will be a mixture of old and young.
I agree, I think Anybody could run, With hard work and dedication, Anythings Possible!
The good things about having a government made up of older people is that they have experience in life and dealing with things in rationality, but the bad things are that older people are infected in many diseases like Alzheimer's, and good and bad things in having a government made up of young people.I personally think that young people have a class of them who can take charge of politics, and there is a class of them who are not mature with their actions and thinking, yet one that the right age to hold the presidency is at the age of 30 at this age that a person is mature and has experience of such subjects.
Hi @poetic_banana, you've made good points, well done! You're right that older people are more at risk of experiencing Alzheimer's disease so there are advantages and disadvantages for both groups. Do you think a 20-year-old would make a good leader? Why or why not?
I don't think a 20-year-old would be a good leader because he's not mature enough, especially since he just went beyond adolescence and his experience would be minimal.
I like your point poetic_banana. You mention that a 20-year-old would have minimal experience. What sort of experiences do you think a person needs to be a good leader?
To have experience in the field of work, to have a person responsible and to know well how to communicate with others and listen to them, as well as ambition, self-confidence, humility and humanity, is part of becoming a good leader.
In my opinion, we should put two presidents for the people, including the elderly. If a president can benefit the people with his experience and experiences in life, and if he has a young or young person with him, then he will consider the young people's point of view on some issues that are in society. And the elderly can look at the thought of young people, the thought of children, and the thought of the elderly as well
The idea of having two presidents to represent different generations and complement each others' experience is a really interesting one. In this idea, would all citizens be able to vote for both of them? Or would each generation vote for its own representative? Can you think of any potential challenges this might create?
@poetic_banana Yes I agree, Age plays a major part in being a Lawmaker. Experience also plays a part in it too!
I think anybody below 30 could still be a lawmaker. Senator, President , Governor , Mayor of the Town.
I am divided by whether it is good to have younger or older people in charge of us. It is good to have older people because they have experience and may be able to think more carefully about their decisions. However, this could also be a bad thing because their experience may cause them to view things in a particular way and they may not be able to think from all perspectives.
Young people would be good for the government because they may be less biased in the way they think as they have less experience. However, they may not be good as authorities because they are inexperienced and may not fuly understand that there are multiple ways to solve problems.
Why shouldn't we make it fair to all parties? I say however much the older people have more experience they also need the younger people to tell them more of what is in the world in their generation today. And if we also include the younger people they can learn more from the older people and how to make right decisions. So it's better that both the older and younger people should all be give a chance to rule us.
Why shouldn't they make it at least even as to whereby we have a youth president and a universal president because it is really hard for our opinions to reach the president and even though they reach i don't think he would do anything that's why we need a youth president like who is between the age of 18-25 yrs and he would be in charge of all people below the age of 25 yrs and this would help the young's voices be heard
To be honest i don't agree because young people do have the advantage over some old people.Young people can use technology that could get more people to hear them out.Old people can also use social media but not at well as younger people.Younger people do think sharper then old people as well but older people do have more history in politics.Younger people can study things about politics and get that experience they need to run for office.With that being said age doesn't mean a lot it could go both ways.
I agree because... young people could actually have a wider view on things because of the information we have available to us, while older people are a little more rigid.
I think the old and the young are all legit. There are good things about old people and there are bad things. The good things are that they have had a lot of problems so they are able to solve problems in a great way, but the bad things about them are that they have neuropsychiatric disorders, and this is a great danger, and they have diseases like diabetes and stress. As for the good things about young people, they have many skills and scientific experiences, and the bad things are that they can take wrong decisions because they are in the youth stage. I think that the appropriate age for the president is from 45 to 70 because at this age he is able to take the necessary decisions
I don't think there should be a specific age for the president
He must have these qualities to be a good boss
One of these qualities is integrity, self-confidence, showing respect
A leader must show respect and appreciation in all his dealings; In order to gain people's trust, improve their performance, and increase the positive atmosphere at work, on the other hand, dealing with respect helps reduce disputes and conflicts.
This is a very interesting point that it depends on their traits because sometimes people have different thoughts and traits than their generation.
I disagree because there are many benefits to having an age of 34 or 35 years old. I have many reasons to support why i think this. When you are 35 you have experiences that not have we you are young like when you are in your 20's. People who are 34 or 35 also have more knowledge and are able to build trust with others. In your 30's you are also able to make money and are able to be good at finances. When you are older you learn how to help others and learn to show compassion to others which makes you a good person and a good president. When you are older you can teach others anything that you know. Older people also are better at listening to others and having patience.
I am not settled as to whether it is better to have older or younger lawmakers or leaders because both old and young leaders have their advantages and disadvantages when in position of leadership.
On one hand old leaders, have accumulated wisdom and experience that is crucial to leading people. There is an old saying common among my people, "What an old man sees while lying down a young man can never see even when he climbs up in the highest iroko tree". What this is saying is that because of all the knowledge old people have accrued, elders can easily perceive things that younger people can't, no matter how hard they try.
However the downside of having old leaders is that they will not have creative ideas like the youths. They won't be able to come up with new ideas like the youths would and they won't be able to make decisions based on the perspective of everyone in a state. The decisions they make may not encompass the thought of everyone.
On the other hand, young leader have a lot of creativity and are filled with new and fresh ideas that will help a state or country to grow. Also, when making decisions, young people are able to make decisions from the perspective of everyone in a state. Their decisions will encompass the thoughts of both young and old in a state.
However young leaders are not as experienced as old leaders and so they are prone to make mistakes as a result of youthful exuberance and lack of carefulness in handling situations and making decisions.
I like the balanced view you have provided on older and younger lawmakers. What do you think the best composition would be for a government. And where would the President sit on that spectrum of older vs younger?
The president would sit on that spectrum of older because a country needs a leader with wisdom and much experience which the old people have but it doesn't change the fact the the country also needs a leader who with creativity and fresh ideas just as "amazing computer" said. That's why I would instead suggest that the vice president or the president's advisors be younger so that they can help the president make good decisions that can help develop the country. And I believe that a country that is being ruled by both the older and the younger won't have many problems and it will develop faster because of their joined effort wisdom, experience from the older then combined with creativity, fresh ideas, good decisions from the younger and I believe they will make very few mistakes that won't even affect the country that much.
your comet is so good
Despite the great responsibility that falls on the shoulders of young people in the political development process, there is still a failure in the political work of young people due to the absence of the correct political upbringing and the failure to acquire the political culture that qualifies the person to master and creativity in political work. Also, the lack of confidence of young people in their role and abilities is an important factor in the failure In addition to the pressures that prevent political action in light of the lack of effective partisan currents, this creates frustration among young people
An interesting point fun_tennis. What do you think could make young people more confident in approaching politics?
I have learned in my life that there are positives and negatives in everything, and no matter how much the positives lie, there must be negatives, and no matter how many negatives there are, there must be positives. One of the good things about the elderly is that they can make the right decisions because of their previous life experiences and because of their calmness and lack of recklessness resulting from life experience, and one of their negatives is that they do not allow young people to be their future entity, and there are also some elderly people who make decisions based on their past and not keeping pace with developments.
One of the advantages of having a government of young people is that the young people knew the general situation in the country, as they themselves were living the situation of other young people in the country and knew the crises and problems they might go through, and their negatives were that they are reckless and have no experience like the elderly because they did not establish and live these problems before And they don't know how to solve it because of the lack of experience I think that the ideal age for the president is from 40 to 55 years so that he is a veteran person who has lived young people and understood what their lives are and what their conditions are and he has experience in his life.
A very well reasoned response free_snail
I feel 30 years is perfect because the individual is still young and has a young mind with creativity, inventiveness, cleverness and initiative. For example in the history of Nigeria there hasn't been a young president that has ruled the country so far. Now that the old people are given the opportunity to rule the country, the country is remaining stagnant and not developing. So I feel the younger people should be given the chance to rule and make a positive difference to move the country forward into a developed country.
This is a very interesting point to debate. What support do you think a 30-year-old President would need to be a good leader?
I think a 30-year-old president needs:
1 Justice and equality between people, regardless of their kinship
2 Good behavior without anger
3- Taking the opinions, suggestions and problems of his people.
4- Organizing the people of his people
5- He should be present with all the needs of his people, whether they are machines, technology or anything else.
I like your reasoning. There's a balance between youth and experience to be considered here. Why do you think the older generations might be more resistant to change? Do you think that someone will have enough life experience to deal with the decisions that need to be made as a president?
From my point of view, I am not with or against the idea of governments presiding over the elderly. Sometimes I see that the elderly are clearly knowledgeable and experienced in the affairs of the state and can take the right decisions with all wisdom and rationality. A sudden deterioration in their health, which leads to impeding the course of some things
I see that the good things about the presence of a government made up of young people is that they have new ideas and have a strong desire to change the lifestyle, which is the best in line with this great development, and they also have ideas that are far from biased in the way of thinking in a way. On the other hand, I see that they are not familiar with Completely about some things and are impulsive in making decisions, as they need the elderly who are indispensable in providing them with advice. The main reference, even if the youth group is the ruling group, is for the elderly who enjoy all rationality and wisdom in making decisions
I think that the ideal age for a president ranges between 30 to 45 years. This age group is the most appropriate because it is characterized by creativity, innovation, intellectual balance and sufficient awareness to make decisions that push the nation to progress and progress.
Hi champion_conclusion! That's a good point about needing balance between creativity and awareness. How important do you think it is for a leader to have both?
I think a leader definitely requires both and it is very important for a leader to have both.
Awareness is crucial because new problems and issues emerge every new year. Problems cannot be eliminated. So a leader needs to keep in pace with the new emerging issues. And awareness is important for a leader also because a leader should make a decision being aware of the impact it will have on the communities of his/her country and the nation in general.
Creativity on the other side is also important because with the new emerging problems, new solutions need to be implemented as well. And past decisions which might have a negative effect on the nation need to be creatively modified to fit the present.
Very thorough response - well done!
1•I think that the existence of a government (presidency) for the elderly is not bad, but it may be a few bad points because they may be inclined to the customs and traditions of their ancestors, but since the world has evolved, the president must develop in order to facilitate dealing with his people and they may infect them with diseases (we know that the elderly They are exposed to many diseases) and as they get older, Alzheimer’s disease can cause them to be “quickly forgetful”.
• The good points (factors) of the policy of the elderly: they are wiser and more knowledgeable than the youth, and because they have more experience than the youth.
2•While the good points in the youth government: It is a good thing as it reduces the unemployment rate and the employment of manpower, and they can also be relied upon to bear responsibility
From my side, I don't think they have bad points, but the president was 21.22 years old. This is considered a bad thing for me.
I think the right age to be president is [30-40] because they know right from wrong and they are more mature, otherwise, if the age is less, they may be immature because they left adolescence and their mind is adolescence
Can you give any examples of good or bad leadership from older or younger leaders?
First: the older leaders,
A: The good points:
1- More culture and science
2- He has life experiences
3- He has a broad thinking.
B: Bad points:
1- Many diseases (as he grows old he will pass through many diseases, diseases will affect him like Alzheimer's disease, he will quickly become forgotten.
Tania: Younger leaders
A: The good points
1- Providing him with experience
2- Employing manpower
B: the bad points
1- Not enough experience as much as the senior presidency by age
2-While he will be out of adolescence, he does not have good experience, knowledge and culture.
*1* What can be the good things about having a government made up of old people? What could the bad things be?
The good thing about having a government made up of old people is that he may have experience and wisdom from the past and he will be more knowledgeable about the requirements of this society.
The bad thing about having a government made up of old people is that it doesn't govern people well and can't control them
*2* What can be the good things about having a government made up of young people? And what could the bad things be?
The good things about having a government made up of young people is that young people are the strongest in society in relation to the age groups and also they can rule the country and also you see them are just in their rule they do not oppress anyone
The bad things about having a government made up of young people is that sometimes you see them in a hurry, and there is a type of young people who do not have experience and wisdom, and there is a kind of reckless
*3* What is the ideal age for a president? and why?
The ideal age for a president, in my opinion, is 35 because he is in his youth and has a mature and distinguished mind
I agree because... knowing that ''The bad things about having a government made up of young people is that sometimes you see them in a hurry, and there is a type of young people who do not have experience and wisdom, and there is a kind of reckless *3* What is the ideal age for a president?'' and that ''The good things about having a government made up of young people is that young people are the strongest in society in relation to the age groups and also they can rule the country and also you see them are just in their rule they do not oppress anyone'' so that's why i agree
You raise some good points. I do you think though that you should not assume that your ideal 35-year-old president is a "he". Women are key leaders in many countries and bring huge strengths to their roles!
Do you think you could take on a political leadership role at some point in your life? What do you think could be a benefit of a female leader over a male one?
The presence of a good ruler is a necessary thing in the country, and therefore there must be a president who fulfills the specifications of governance and these specifications have nothing to do with being old or young in age. Also, the elderly are better than the youth in governance, but there are characteristics that distinguish the elderly from the youth. The elderly have many experiences. If they face a situation, they can build a solution according to the situation that happened with them previously, but the young people in this regard have few experiences, but that does not mean that they do not They can solve the problems that confront them. With intelligent thinking, they can find solutions. Young people are distinguished by their strong affection for their homelands. Therefore, they sacrifice the most for the sake of their country, and I see that in my country. They are also distinguished by their intelligence as for the elderly, they love their country, but you do not find sacrifice in them as you find it in the youth. The elderly are characterized by calmness and deliberation in situations, but young people get angry quickly and rush into situations quickly and this may not be in the interest. Therefore, the ruling must be a mixture of young people and the elderly in order to complete the ruling.
Older people will be more intelligent and will make better decisions as youn gpeople will just say stupid things like 'Everyone gets chocolate and sweets for free' and adults will say ' chocolate will cost £1.25 ' which is very very reasonable.
Free chocolate would be great but as you realise, someone has to pay for it!!
You say that older people are more intelligent but perhaps a better way to say this would be that they are more experienced and maybe wise? There are many highly intelligent young people out there and also lots of less intelligent older people (and vice-versa)! Do you think there might a balance to be found between youth and experience? What age do you think that might happen?
The bad things about young people being in the government will be that they will make inappropriate decisions and the good things about young people being in the government is they will be able to learn things for longer and hopefully be a good M:P.
That's an interesting perspective based the impact of young people in government. In comparison to older individuals, how do you think young leaders could benefit the country?
I think that what you are saying is true young people may make inappropriate decisions and will make good decisions .
Do you think it's true to say that older people sometimes make inappropriate decisions too? Can you think of any examples? How do we decide what is appropriate?
The perfect age for a president will be 35 because it is old enough to be intelligent enough to be a president but not too old to be a president so that is a suitable age.
Hi, currently in the US you have to be 35 to serve as president in order to ensure the leader has wisdom and maturity. Do you believe there is enough reason to change that law, even though the oldest president thus far was 43?
i am not going to say you are wrong but you can be old and young. to run for president is 34 and 35.
I think that it is good to have a government composed of elderly people who have experience and wisdom in managing the country. It is bad sometimes that a government of the elderly lacks the aspirations and interests of young people. I also think that it is good to have a government of young people capable of running the country in line with the current era, but there are some negatives to a government made up of young people only, including the hasty decision-making. Despite that, I believe that there is no specific age for working in the political field as long as the person has the capabilities and experience that will help him make the right decision.
Another negative detail of having an aged government is that thanks to their elderly minds they sometimes can't make the wise and best decisions and that cost dearly and I mean no disrespect but if their minds are not thinking properly they would not be able to run the government for long. A negative detail of having a young government is that thanks to their young age they cannot make the wise,and best decsion.
From my point of view, the old policemen do not have the elegance and agility that the young men do, but nevertheless, they have good experience, intelligence and acumen, and you rarely find a small person who has the characteristics of a senior policeman, so the police team should consist of adults and children.
In my opinion, I suggest that the perfect age for a president is between 38 to 45 years because a person of that age bracket has already experienced the country challenges and is willing to try to solve them in any possible way that may include borrowing ideas from other developed countries, using respectful language unlike a person below that age bracket who may just decide to do what they feel like due to less experience of the country challenges and excitement for the presidential post.
I agree because yes this experience is the best teacher and of course a person in this age bracket shall try their level best to correct the mistakes made by previous leaders and put a way forward for more development
I am divided by whether it is good to have younger or older people in charge of us. It is good to have older people because they have experience and may be able to think more carefully about their decisions. However, this could also be a bad thing because their experience may cause them to view things in a particular way and they may not be able to think from all perspectives.
Young people would be good for the government because they may be less biased in the way they think as they have less experience. However, they may not be good as authorities because they are inexperienced and may not fully understand that there are multiple ways to solve problems.
I agree with you if we were to have a young government there would be problems but if we were to have an old government there would be problems with that government as well.
Hi spectacular_raisin - Can you give some examples of the problems you think an older or younger government would cause?
Sure, with a young government they would not have enough experience and they would not think that much carefully and would sometimes make arrogant decisions that could have a big impact. With an older government they would be more responsible but thanks to how old they are they would think that sometimes the old way would be the best and I mean no disrespects but sometimes the old way is not the best way and besides thanks to there old age there mind would deteriorate and because of that they cannot make careful decisions, but it is hard to determine but in my opinion the most responsible people and the people who would better the country should be in charge.
This is a great example of responding to and building on another student's comment, spectacular_raisin!
Try checking out My other comments and a person named accurate_Wombat gave me the Idea for some of the comments I made try checking out some of there too.
It's great to learn from other comments, spectacular_raisin!
Check out my first comment that I posted on November 3rd there I stated the positive sides of having an aged or younger government and shoutout to accurate wombat he gave me some ideas for my first comment
The ideal age for a president?!
It is the age of youth, as it represents the largest proportion in societies. He will take care of his country. He will understand the thinking of most of them. He will be close to them. And that's a good thing for society to be sophisticated and sophisticated in the pool of ideas between the president and his fellow citizens.
Do you think someone older won't be able to cover all these topics as well?
Having an aged government isn't such a bad thing but there is much controversy in their mode of thinking.The most obvious benefit of an aging population is that more people will enjoy long lifespans, as access to proper housing, food, and healthcare continues to increase across the board.Sometimes they believe doing things the same old way works best but it's not the same every time is it. his difficulty in getting on the field, secondly, his preoccupation with his old age and the diseases of his old age.
In opinion people who show courage and people who want to better the living conditions of that country. A great candidate for president should be a person who has served in the military and someone who has risked their own life and someone who very much wants to help the citizens of their country should be president.
The possible good thing about having a government made up of older people is that older people might have more background. They have more background because they have lived more and know more about how things work around there. Also another reason they should do good because they think more carefully about their decisions. The bad thing that can happen if having a government for older people is that they can forget something. Like they said a great point last night and then the next morning he probably forgot. And old people really don't like to use technology and they like to use old school methods.
The presence of a good ruler is a necessary thing in the country, and therefore there must be a president who fulfills the specifications of governance and these specifications have nothing to do with being old or young in age. Also, the elderly are better than the youth in governance, but there are characteristics that distinguish the elderly from the youth. The elderly have many experiences. If they face a situation, they can build a solution according to the situation that happened with them previously, but the young people in this regard have few experiences, but that does not mean that they do not They can solve the problems that confront them. With intelligent thinking, they can find solutions. Young people are distinguished by their strong affection for their homelands. Therefore, they sacrifice the most for the sake of their country, and I see that in my country. They are also distinguished by their intelligence as for the elderly, they love their country, but you do not find sacrifice in them as you find it in the youth. The elderly are characterized by calmness and deliberation in situations, but young people get angry quickly and rush into situations quickly and this may not be in the interest.
What might the good things be about having a government made up of older people? The good things about having a made up government for older people is that the older people may forget things but the younger people don't forget things.
What might the good things be about having a government made up of older people?What might the bad things be?
The bad thing is that the older people sometimes forget stuff, the younger people sometimes forget stuff but think about the older people, who always forget stuff.
What’s the perfect age for a president? Why?The perfect age for a president is 35 because its a younger age. Plus it's a perfect way to begin your career because you have a long way to go, You are 35 now but wait until you get like 76 big time money.
35 would be considered very young for president. You make a good point that a younger president could have a longer career, why might this be important?
I am divided by whether it is good to have younger or older people in charge of us. It is good to have older people because they have experience and may be able to think more carefully about their decisions. However, this could also be a bad thing because their experience may cause them to view things in a particular way and they may not be able to think from all perspectives.and old people have way more experience but i think that.
Young people would be good for the government because they may be less biased in the way they think as they have less experience. However, they may not be good as authorities because they are inexperienced and may not fully understand that there are multiple ways to solve problems.and protect people's and to help there country. And on my opinion i think older people's are better to be a president and one day one of you guys can be a president
It is good for the ruler of the state to have wisdom and a high understanding. In this way, the rulers are chosen. We agree well that old people are knowledgeable and experienced in the affairs of the state, but it is possible that when a man reaches old age and becomes old, he cannot bear the pressure of work and the responsibility that falls On his shoulders, and we must give the opportunity to the youth group so that they can take their right to rule, express their opinion and deliver the message of the youth, as is the case with us in the President of the State of Palestine, he is over eighty years old and is still in the presidency and they could not replace him with the youth group, but at the time This is why we have advanced minds. These minds must be exploited in the development of the state.
One of the advantages of having a government of young people is that the young is people knew the general situation in the country as them themselves were living the situation of other young people in the country and knew the crises and problems they might go through and their negatives were that they are reckless and have no experience like the people if we have older presidents that if they lose.
The good things about having a government made up for younger people because they are young people because they don't make that much mistakes like old people. Also they gain information about their options and rights, develop decision-making skills, develop an understanding of decision processes. Their mind is fresh and not full of stuff. But a bad thing about having a young government is that they don't have many problems since they don't have many problems they don't know how to solve them. And they don't know much about the government since there still young. And an advantage is that they don't forget stuff fast.
I agree but another negative detail is that thanks to their young age they would not have enough experience and wisdom.
I think that older people are better because they know alot from their mistakes but it is true young people could have some good potential but elder presidents also have good potential to.i mean im not hating on either but i think somone maybe in their 37s or 40s could make a good president but young lawmakers could have a lottt of potential by like making something were kids can work at real jobs at 12 or something.
First, the bad things about having an older president is that they might believe in the thing that went on back then and younger people these days may not agree with the decision that that president may make.The good things about have a older president is that they may be more wise and know more life experiences than a older person and they may know what to do when they are president.Second, the bad things about having a younger person is that they may be more irresponsible and they may not as many life experiences as an older person.Yet a younger person may be good because they think the same way as a younger generation and a younger generation may agree with a younger presidents decisions.I would say that the perfect age for a president would be from 30-40 because they may understand a younger generation and an older generation's opinion.
As stated by an accurate wombat "Having an aged government isn't such a bad thing but there is much controversy in their mode of thinking". If we had an aged government there would be both positive and negative the Positive is that the elderly people who run the government have more experience and wisdom. The negative side is that with their deterioration and ageing they cannot function and run the government properly and they think the old way is the best way, and in no means do I show disrespect to the elderly it is just that thanks to there old age they cannot run the government forever and besides the old way is not the best way. If young people were to run the government just like the elderly people there would be negative and positive sides the positive is that they would be at their prime which would make it more suitable to run the government for years. The negative side is that with them being young they would not have enough experience and wisdom and they might slip up and make mistakes in battles and in political term. But in my opinion everybody should have a just and fair government whether they be old or young.
what the perfect age for a president? the perfect age is 34 you can run for president the president can do a lot of stuff like veto bills and sign bills.
Hi Caring_wolf - I'm curious how you came up with 34 as the perfect age, could you explain?
yes i can explain so there is a pacific age limit for a president you have to be 34 and 35.
The bad thing is that the government has to much power and they pretty old so they think they can do anything they want like brian kemp. The good thing is that they know when to stop when war is happening or something and they know what they doing and they good at it. a perfect age for a president is 45
The good thing about having an older government is the more experience in the life of the people.Older governments have more experience in policies they see policies control the kunshe and know what is good and what bad decision.older governments have the bad. Older governments are not good with money in today's high tax on people.
The good thing about having a younger government is the more experience in the people wet and what they dort wet becus the wes the people want what they want.Younger government is the more experience in the home popom the high rate of reat to pay. The younger government has the bad.younger government is not experienced in the policies.
Perfect age for a president is 60 years old
You are right that having an older government is not a bad idea because they have a wealth of experience just like you mentioned. They have experience and would be able to make good decisions based on their experience.
But you said something which I do not agree with. You said, "The younger government has the bad." Let's look at it from the point of view that yes the younger government may not have the wealth of experience that the older government may have but they are more creative and open-minded when compared to older people. Creativity can be used to solve the problems of man. They can use their problem-solving skills to ensure the smooth running of the country. Don't you agree?
Both younger and older governments have their advantages and disadvantages so they should all work together in a government to complement and supplement each other and there should also be equal representation of both sides. I also think that the personality of a leader should also be considered and not just age. A leader with a good personality will be able to surround his/herself with the right company young or old, needed to run the country well.
Having an old government isn't such a bad thing but they think doing a things the old way will work but its not the same every time is it. We young people should have a chance to show the world that young people can make a change. Well that's just my opinion.I think the perfect age should be 13 or 14 young people should have a chance to.
Having an older government leaders is good because they have more experience of life and work and they will make more wiser decisions but having a younger government means they would have more education and knowledge about decision making about making new rules,laws,etc.The perfect age for a president is between the ages 45 and 60 because there have a better knowledge to know what can be a good decision and bad decision. and who there vice president is based on how good they do.
You are right because they have more experience than younger people and don’t make mistakes