Will schools exist in future?
It is hard to escape news about Artificial Intelligence.
AI can already respond to situations, make decisions and do some jobs better than humans. There are constant breakthroughs in the technology, which mean the list of things it can do is quickly growing.
This got us thinking. If technology can learn how to do things instead of people, does this mean that people won't need to go to school to learn at all?
Look at the following opinions.
"There’s no point in going to school when machines can do the learning for us!”
"People will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too."
“School is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with.”
Choose one opinion and share how you would respond to it in the comments below.
For example, you could say why you agree or disagree, or explain how it made you feel.
Don’t forget to respond to other student’s comments to share your opinions about what they have to say too.
Comments (631)
I believe that the education system in the future will be better than it is today due to the rapid development of technology and artificial intelligence, but I do not believe that school systems will become extinct because of this. In a world where machines are constantly evolving, despite our unprecedented intelligence, humans' inherent desire to learn remains an irreplaceable aspect of our existence. While machines excel at processing large amounts of data and performing complex tasks, the essence of personal growth, creativity and understanding lies in the individual's unique ability to learn on their own. The human capacities for curiosity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence ensure that the pursuit of knowledge extends beyond the realm of artificial intelligence. Even as machines advance, the eternal journey of self-discovery and enlightenment will always remain a unique and integral aspect of the human experience.
I agree because... Your logics are so true.
Really? I agree for the same reason.
I completely agree to your opinion, Every thing that you said is great. The part about self learning, enlightenment and the fact that Ai cannot change the internal aspects of human experience and eternal journey of self-discovery are very true and logical.
I agree with you because what you said is completely true. I also believe that the education system will be better than today's.
Exceptional point fantastic_song, self-discovery is a key process every human should pass through if one wants to succeed and that is a big reason why AI can't replace teachers. A teacher plays a big role in helping a student in self discovery, a teacher is a friend, a counsellor, a role model and a confidant. I see no reason why a teacher shouldn't be close to the students, it's being close that helps the teacher understand the students' plight and help them develop and grow therefore, guiding them through the process of self-discovery. That term self-discovery is one thing that motivates a human to live and the whole classroom learning aids that process, expecting a human who talks to an AI for a minimum of 8 hours per day to be able to socialize easily and develop emotions easily is like expecting a tortoise to win a race. In conclusion, school shouldn't be stopped and replaced with AI otherwise it will have negative psychologically effect which will in a way disrupt the clean process of self discovery
Who else in our lives help us with self-discovery?
There are many factors responsible for aiding the process of self discovery. The main reason I mentioned school as one of the major agents is because school is also one of the major agents of socialization. Majority of the time spent in a child's life is at school, in my daily life, I spend at least 10hours of my day doing school work and this has its effect in my self discovery. Another major agent of self discovery is family and friends, there's a common saying in my society, "show me your friend and I'll tell you who you are", the company of people you move along with has its effect in the way one thinks and behaves therefore also influencing the process of self discovery because it affects the way people view themselves. There are also little influencers of self discovery, for example religion and spirituality and also the contents one exposes himself to, they all play a role in self discovery.
Hi
I agree with you ,Ai can not replace teachers, without teachers, AI cannot see if the students understand the topic, another example if a student is injured or he is sad or going through difficult emotions Ai can't help but teacher can help ,my point here is that a teacher can't be replaced but Ai can help teacher and other workers.
Thank you.
I solidly agree with you because, AI cannot express human emotions.
AI cannot go deeply in explanation for slow learners they only give you informations based on what is been programmed to them.
AI can't be able to detect whether a student is paying attention in class or not. According to my opinion, I think humans are the best in any job that has to do with education or lecturing because, how to know whether the student is getting what has been thought, I think the best way of learning is through practicals because, practice makes perfect.
In conclusion, I think AI cannot take over humans intelligence but rather, it enhances the level of productivity in learning,
THANKS!!!
Hello!
I strongly agree with you because, in my opinion, teachers are unique and irreplaceable. I remember when we were confined at home because of COVID-19 and I suffered a lot with online classes because I didn't understand nothing. In my opinion, I prefer to go to in-person classes than turn on the computer and spend many hours in front of the screen trying to learn things that were very difficult for me.
Hello Tiff,
I think in some cases, people become inspirations, guiding us to self-discovery and motivating us to strive to be the best version of ourselves. However, this journey is inherently personal, and there is no one-size-fits-all approach to self-discovery. It seems to me that this universal catalyst for change is being challenged. Challenge is a motivator that unlocks our true potential. Whether these obstacles arise in personal, academic, or professional realms, they create fertile ground for reflection and growth. Facing and overcoming challenges forces us to explore our strengths, confront our weaknesses, and demonstrate our resilience. Furthermore, I also think that , every challenge holds up a mirror, revealing aspects of our personality that may have been obscured during smoother times. Embracing these moments of adversity becomes a transformative process that allows us to uncover hidden potential, gain a deeper understanding of our values, and develop the resilience needed to face future challenges. The ability to respond to and learn from challenges not only shapes our character, but also gives us a deep sense of self, allowing us to continue on a journey of self-discovery.
Hey Tiff! After much thought, some people that can help us with self discovery are our parents or any form elderly person because 1. they got to experience finding their self discoveries first and so they can help guide us to discovering our true selves. In addition, one important person that can help in self discovery is our selves. We are the only people who know our selves best and one way to start that is start some reflecting and journaling. Feel free to share your ideas. Are there any more ways in discovery our selves?
Heyy Tiff!! The one who can really help with our self discovery are our parents,elders,community, and school.....After a deep thought I guess self discovery can be possible if you have faith in yourself........Parents and elders are the one who correct your mistakes and give you advises to be more enthusiastic.........community helps us to seek inside ownself,and the context of our lives............School is the greatest agent in our lives who help to discover ourself it gives you creativity, it adds social skills,school skills to our mind,it explores our mind,interests,passions...........Extracurricular activities also discover us outside the classroom such as music,dance etc...................Also a agent that is in yourself helps to discover yourself that is your heart and mind.......when sitting alone,just close your eyes and think what can I do at this perfect timming when no one's gonna disturb you........think and do it and you've already done the self discovery.....
Hey there, Tiff,
I think our parents and teachers can help us with self-discovery because our parents raised us since we were infants, and they often know us in ways others might not because they have been with us for how long we have stayed on Earth so far. Plus, they also often know our strengths and weaknesses and our behaviours. Regarding our teachers, I believe they can also help us with self-discovery because they can help us uncover potential talents and passions, and they are also able to study us, see our weaknesses, and help us overcome them.
Thank you for supporting the Storytelling_economy. Your comments really hit the mark. I strongly believe that teachers can make a big difference in students' lives. As someone who changed schools a lot due to my dad's job, I've felt the impact of teachers on my journey. Your focus on the emotional side of learning is crucial.
Unlike artificial intelligence, human emotions and connections are real and irreplaceable. The understanding, empathy, and inspiration that teachers provide are unique. I think the emotional aspect is what makes education so powerful. The paradox of our interconnected yet isolated world, especially when it comes to technology, is fascinating. Despite being virtually connected, there is still a sense of distance. Social media can create a false sense of happiness and hide the true complexity of life.
I totally agree and this is a great example of the opinion I had on this topic. Teachers have more emotional effects on students and they have more understanding about a person than AI could have. Teachers help students develop their progress as well as develop and personality better. This is because they help through emotional problems. Emotional problems also help someone complete goals and have better performance, which is why AI would not be quite good in this section of work. Your claim is very similar to mine.
I agree with this because i think using AI allows you to work faster and more efficiently which is exactly what school need. AI will bring schools more knowledge , however this will remove children's chances for physical learning and things like school trips that sometimes helps them learn when they see it in person and get to visually try the topic.
Overall AI can bring benifits to school in the future but can also ruin some children's learning. In general i would prefer a human teacher because i think its good to have physical support.
Some people have said that school trips will become a thing of the past because AI will allow us to "travel" to different places using augemented reality or VR headsets. Do you think this is a good way to replace school trips? Why/why not?
Personally, I don't think augmented reality or VR headset can fully replace the school trips. My reason being that school trips doesn't just allow the students to have real life experience of things, it also presents them with the opportunity of meeting people who have additional knowledge about things, this can foster a sense of connection and empathy which cannot be achieved by virtual reality therefore helping them to learn. School trip gives room for hands on learning which last longer in the memory of students compared to theoretical learning, it is also more interactive than augmented reality thereby making learning fun and when there's fun in learning, learning becomes a whole lot easier.
Hello, yes I am into your point of view. Augmented reality and virtual trips cannot represent real life trips as interaction with society and its citizens is missing. The same goes with school trips where you miss the face to face interaction with your classmates and all these experiences you could share and will forever stay in your memory.
I don't think it is a good way to replace school trips. School trips is a main attraction and the best memories of a student life. School trip helps student to get rid of their monotony life. School trips served a lot of purposes like it helps to make a change of environment, build a good relationship between teachers and other students, create cultural awareness and many more. Students also came to learn about the history of the country and visited historical monument. The change of environment and the fun that happen in a school trip can never be replaced by augmented reality or VR headsets. This enjoyment served as a fuel for the student to study attentively throughout the year. So, I will personally never choose VR headsets over school trips. School trips are a kind of memories which a student cherishes for the whole life. As a school trip has a lot of benefits and played an important role in student life, it should never be replaced by augmented reality or VR headset.
I don't support the idea of Virtual reality trips,because it just takes away all the fun in traditional old school trips.Do you know that feeling when you're so excited to go out to a new place and have a different experience.In my opinion I think that this excitement differs from one to another because it depends on your goal or target of this trip.Is it the learning that you crave from these school trips,or is it the relationships that you may create or strengthen with others.I personally get so excited to go on school trips just to meet new people and have a fun-filled time with my friends.besides,these trips can improve your social interaction skills and cooperation.Last but not least, school trips are a clever way that would help the teacher to teach students better because students love to vary their way of learning and school trips are totally a pleasurable way to learn and to grow socially and mentally.
I agree because... school trips are not only about learning, but also about having the actual physical experience. Having Virtual Reality for school trips won't be actually physical. You cannot actually feel everything. It is a fake experience but most students want it real. It removes the actual excitement of having the experience of seeing everything and being with others.
I totally agree with you. The excitement you get during a school trip is one of the most rewarding feelings. Human interaction is so important and the bond we get with our classmates during these trips is essential.
Augmented reality can be used as an enhancement to add any information for geography or history lessons, in my opinion.
I don't believe that augmented reality is a good replacement for school trips. School trips are meant to provide students with a chance to learn outside of their usual environment. If augmented reality were to replace traditional school trips, students would be learning in the same environment throughout the entire school year. Also, VR headsets are expensive, and purchasing them for an entire class would have a significant economic impact on the school. Although augmented reality provides a wider range of opportunities for students to explore, I believe that it would be unable to fully replicate the learning opportunities provided by real-life school trips.I don't believe that augmented reality is a good replacement for school trips. School trips are meant to provide students with a chance to learn outside of their usual environment. If augmented reality were to replace traditional school trips, students would be learning in the same environment throughout the entire school year. Also, VR headsets are expensive, and purchasing them for an entire class would have a significant economic impact on the school. Although augmented reality provides a wider range of opportunities for students to explore, I believe that it would be unable to fully replicate the learning opportunities provided by real-life school trips.
In my opinion I disagree that people should go on trips using augemented reality or VR headsets because people go trips to explore different cultures ,histories and art. Trips broden people horizons and help gain a new perspective on life. People also go on trips becuase of adventures and meeting new people and creatures. Trips help people with their socializing skills and collaboration skills. People go on trips to learn different languages . Trips can be a way for people to relax and reveal stresses of everyday.
What do you think people would gain from a VR 'school trip?'
Hello Eva ,Thank you for the Question, In my opinion I dont think student will gain any thing fro VR school trips, this reason is because everything in the VR isnt real it just a replica of how school trips is meant to be like. School trips are meant to teach student about the world , the problems it is facing and the beauty and wonders it has to give. Schools trips opens the minds of students and teaches them how to slove problemand enriches their communnations skills. Apart from that I believe schools trips can help students with their collaboration skills, for example traveling to new place means meeting new people ,which means they can collaborate with new people and relate to them in many ways. If student use VR for their school trips it reduce their collaboration skills and communication skills. Also using VR for schools trips has many negative effects such it can damge the students eyes sight, headaches and dried eyes but if students go on school trips it can affect them positively by , providing them vitamins and freash air.
A VR school trip in my opinion would not be as good as it is not a real school trip as you would not be able to interact with the natural world or wherever you go. However, it would be a lot cheaper as some parents may to be able to afford to send their child on the trip.
Hello Eva, I think children will not gain anything from a vr experience trip, my reasons are: Children really need to see the real world and not some fake world. They probably want to see the landmark or the place/country they might go to on a school trip. If they want to see the real world they have to take of those goggles and go outside
I strongly agree wtih your comment with your comment because , chidren deserve to see the real world and experience the feeling of touching trees, going horse-backing riding etc. Trips enhances childrens collaboration and communication skills, it allows them to relax and reflection on past events. Trips develop children independence and confidence to explore the world. Trips teachs children new languages, cuture, cuisines and arts. It enhances their analytical skills. Trips allows children to meet new people and learn differnet opinions. Trips allows childen to experience different perspectives about life and that prepares children for the challanges and opportunities the world throw at them.
I believe it isn't the best idea for school trips. Many students would prefer the actual experience and excitement, along with being with their friends in-person. It will be disliked by many. While people may like the new experience, it isn't the actual physical trip. Which is what many prefer.
I can't see school trips being fully replaced with AI, yes schools can use VR to visit many places around the world but that isn't the true purpose of school trips, it is meant to provide experiences and unforgettable events.
Which will you remember more, u and your friend entering a bus with excitement or you putting on a headset and just looking around, I'm not saying that we can't use VR headsets to teach I can't wait to see it but the fact is that school trips give student thing VR opportunities like meeting people and gaining skills sense of empathy and connection that just can't be achieved in true virtual reality
While VR technology allows for virtual visits to diverse locations, it can't replace the essence of traditional school trips. The shared excitement of boarding a bus with friends, the laughter, and the interpersonal connections made during physical outings create unforgettable experiences that foster empathy and connection. These invaluable aspects of school trips cannot be replicated in virtual reality.
Your perspective on AI in education reflects a thoughtful consideration of both its advantages and potential drawbacks. Acknowledging the speed and efficiency that AI can bring to learning processes is essential, and the promise of increased knowledge through AI is undoubtedly a positive aspect.
Your concern about the potential reduction in physical learning experiences, such as school trips, resonates with the idea that some aspects of education involve hands-on, real-world engagement that might be challenging for AI to replicate. The importance of visual and experiential learning is well-highlighted.
Balancing the benefits of AI with the irreplaceable value of human interaction and support is a crucial consideration. Your preference for a human teacher aligns with the belief that the personal touch and physical presence of educators can provide valuable support and guidance, which goes beyond what AI can currently offer.
In conclusion, your nuanced perspective recognizes the potential benefits of AI while emphasizing the irreplaceable role of human teachers in providing holistic support for students' learning experiences. thank you .
I disagree with this opinion, yes I understand AI is a much faster way of teaching yes, but does it mean it's better for the children no especially for younger kids, I'm not saying u can't use AI to teach, no but u can't rely on it for stuff like emotional intelligence, teachers pay a lot in a child life imagine ur life without ur favorite teacher, And think of how it will be if robot fully thought the next generation children. I am not saying that teachers are perfect all I'm trying to say is that we should let the teachers be assisted by AI.
Yes I agree with your comment because you have given it with strong reason. Your logics are so true and fantastic. And I also believe on that the schools will exist in the future. Even ai also cannot make them disexist.
I agree and you make very strong, valid, intelligent points.
i strongly agree with your comment, although artficial intelligence has far greater minds then we do, i believe as well that schools will not become extinct
I totally agree with your opinion. Human create the AI. Human are more intelligent than AI. I believe that education system will change in future due to rapid growth in AI but I don’t think that because of this school will extinct in the future.
That’s my understanding
Why do you NOT think schools will 'go extinct' due to AI?
Hi ,chole i don't think that school will extinct due to ai because 'Human Teacher play vital role in shaping life of student influencing not only their academic development but also their personal growth and character formation'. AI are created by humans human is more intelligent than AI. Students made lot of mistake and human teacher share his thought so that they will not repeat same mistake . A robot teacher would only follow a fixed set of protocols, which is sort of boring and kills the fun in the learning process! A robot would just teach teach teach and teach! So boring! Every human is unique in it's own ways meaning that all human teachers are not the same and have different ways of teaching.
That's my understanding.
Hello Champion_Weasel,
I agree with what you're saying I don't believe school will be threatened by the existence of "AI."
Humans play an important part in building life for the future generation by building them up academically and also so personally and also shaping their character. Human knowledge is far more than an AI programmed by humans. AI goes off what is programmed to do so they are unable to convey emotion. All the AI does is a continuum of teaching. This can get plain after sometime because the students are just getting taught. As for teachers they convey emotions when they teach which keeps students entertained and engaged into what they are learning. By this, the students will be easier to teach and have better comprehension.
Hello Chloe,
For several compelling reasons, I believe the existence of schools is unlikely to be threatened by artificial intelligence. Education goes far beyond the mere transfer of information and includes key elements such as social interaction, emotional learning and personalized guidance. The human contact is critical to fostering social interaction and emotional development and is the cornerstone of the educational experience. While AI can enhance personalized learning, it cannot replace nuanced guidance and support from teachers who understand their students’ unique needs. School physical spaces play a key role in promoting the practical experiments and hands-on activities required for a well-rounded education. Take collaborative science projects, for example, where students engage in joint experiments, develop teamwork and hone critical thinking skills. Furthermore, schools are centers of cultural and social education, influencing values and building community bonds. Human teachers serve as important mentors and role models, igniting passions and instilling moral values in students. The adaptable, creative and motivational dimensions that human educators bring contribute significantly to preparing students to meet the challenges of a rapidly evolving world. Therefore, the multifaceted nature of education and the depth of human connections suggest that schools are here to stay and will not be intimidated by advances in artificial intelligence. Therefor In my perspective, AI could never entirely replace humans; humans will always hold a superior position. The essence of humanity, with its complex emotions, creativity, and moral reasoning, is irreplaceable. While AI may excel in certain tasks, the depth of human experience and the ability to navigate intricate ethical and emotional landscapes remain unparalleled. Humans bring a unique blend of empathy, intuition, and adaptability that contributes to our superiority over AI. It is in our collective humanity that we find the richness and depth that machines, despite their capabilities, cannot fully replicate.
Hi there!
Your thoughts on schools and artificial intelligence are spot on! You bring up great points about the importance of human connections in education, especially the role of teachers as mentors and guides. The idea of collaborative projects and hands-on activities in schools adds a nice touch to illustrating the practical side of learning.
Your emphasis on the unique qualities of humans, like empathy and creativity, is beautifully expressed. You capture the essence of what makes us special and irreplaceable in the educational journey. Overall, your perspective is clear, relatable, and wonderfully crafted. Awesome job!
I agree strongly agree with your comment because , we humans are social beings, intreacting with people is how we get know to other people better, and teachers are the best examples. Subjects such as Science , English, Math and other continental languages all use one key feature and that communication. Communication and Collaboration bind people togther and that one thing That AI can not control. Teachers play a vital role in Education. Their influence extends beyonds the classroms, Encouraging students in many ways. Teachers effective teachings, personalized attention and encouragement can boost a students learning ability and outcomes. Teacher serve as a role model inspring students to pusure their goals. Teacher build postive relationships with students nurturing their trust and and respect. Teachers empathize and communicate effectively to improve a students dedication and and enthusiasm. Teachers can impact students beyond academics by implanting values, morals, and social skills,hence students can develop emaphty and resilience. Apart from teachers students can interact with theor peers by having study groups and play dates. In my opinion even though AI has the capabilities of doing the job of a teacher, I strongly dissagree that AI will fit the jod because Students once in while will need some time to play and commuincate and even crack some jokes with their teachers, all these act express emotions and that is one thing that AI cannot control.
Hello Chole,
In my opinion I belive schools will not go extinct due to AI , AI use create by humans , its mission is to support mans work and make it easy. AI can assits in schools by advancing students capabilities , advance their spelling and writing skills. AI can help teachers arrange their schedules so teachers can interact with their students more. AI can help teachers create mor engaging and interative lessons. AI help students with essays and writing skills . AI can assist students with disabilities by engagingthem in online classes, apps such as Apadted Math, Quizizz and Education city can help disabled students study without going to school. AI can disabled students by creating prosthetics lega and arms so disable student can live normally. AI voice technologies such as Siri, Alexa , Cortana can help foreign exchange students understand the language by translating into their language , apart from that AI can studetns with hearing problems understand the lessons . Ai can help deaf students by tranlating the teachers voice into words. Students who are mute can use AI to respond to teachers when a question is posed.
Another reason why schools will not go extinct is because AI cannot perform the duties of a teacher. Teachers are humans , they bring excitement and humour in class. AI cannot help with students with their collaboration and communication skills. Teachers can provide students with love support and can understand students issues. Teachers can agree and agrue with students , which improve students communcation and provide students with analytical questions.
To concluded I believe schools will never go exticnt because students can express their opinions and showcases their talents.
Yes I also agree to fantastic_song. The AI can replace the teacher but it can not teach students the creativity and natural understanding. These two the main building blocks of a student. A student is fully incomplete without these two blocks. For example: AI can teach a students what is rocket science but creativity teaches them how is rocket science.
Hello Philosophical_seagull,
I agree with what you are saying as well as this is what I have been stating. The AI can replace the teacher but it won't work out well. It cannot teach students creativity and convey emotion so the students can have a natural understanding of what is going on. The average student has teachers that make mental and physical connections with them so that they can be taught easier. Without emotion being conveyed, it'll be much harder for the student to learn because they are unable to feel a connection in the teaching. The AI goes off protocol and just teaches and teaches, however the teacher adds the flavor to the teaching which helps the student with comprehension. Without the emotion, the student cannot learn.
I agree with you that AI will help to improve education and that school will not be replaced but even humans are curious and critical thinkers I don’t think they there own knowledge unless they are inspired from a young age which I think comes from humans. Humans inspire us to learn, AI can’t give personal feedback and understand why someone might be struggling especially for primary school as it is hard to understand young children as they can’t communicate the same way an adult does. Will AI be able to tell why someone is struggling because some children might avoid doing the work will be able to get to the root cause, teachers know children as they’ve been doing it for a long time and had lots of experience. But maybe AI might work better at higher education as they want to learn and it’s their choice and they’re past their teenage years of messing about.
I completely agree because with how amazing and unique artificial intelligence is today I couldn't dream about how much more artificial intelligence could help and grow education systems in the future or even teaching new learning methods. I also agree on the part where artificial intelligence won't shut down the entirety of schools, though artificial intelligence has overcame human abilities and is gonna definitely grow human standards. I also believe throughout time it won't get rid of schools instead it will add onto it and maybe showing new lesson plans for schools without discouraging schools but instead growing it to be better than it was before. With the human natural skills as well as AI it will make school even more enjoyable for all, so I agree with this comment.
I totally agree to your point of view......the best part I liked about your opinion was of self learning and self discovery......I really agree with all the points you told in the comment.......
I completely agree with fantastic_song. Your insight beautifully express the value of human learning and growth in the face of advancing technology. While technology and AI undoubtedly enhance educational tools and processes, they can't replace the natural human qualities that drive curiosity, critical thinking, creativity and emotional intelligence. The journey of self-discovery and enlightenment is a deeply human experience that go beyond the capabilities of machines. Your perspective underscores the importance of taking care of these natural human qualities alongside technological advancements in education. And we should use machines to enhance the capability of humans but not to replace human.
I agree because... school will exist in the future,because you need to be educated before knowing about AI. I don’t mean that it’s in School you can learn.but most people need to go to school for education. In the future AI will help education, like helping in homework ,knowing more about the subject and make them to experience things.
Thanks 😊
I agree with what you are saying because AI is getting better and better but that doesn't mean you have to exile schools. people still need to learn to do things that machines can't. You have to learn to do things yourself even if AI is getting better. If you don't AI will have to do everything for you. That's why I agree with what you are saying fantastic_song.
I disagree because... AIs impact in schools is very negative. students will not be doing critical thinking and solving problems. The main question is will schools exist in the future? Schools will not exist in the future because students will not try hard enough they will have that feeling that if they get stuck AI will be there for them.
Do you think that given your points that it is even more important to support schools staying open?
HI Ursula @The economist
I support school staying open with AIs free environment.If their no AI the environment will be more natural.
I believe that AI will replace teachers, as AI has the knowledge of hundreds of people combined coded into it. Therefore the student would be able to learn more.
I agree and hope what your saying becomes true. Our school system is outdated and technology could help creating a new form of school/learning in general. AI is also playing a major role, it could be used to help students who struggle with studies and stress.
I agree with your opinions because everything you said makes a lot of sense that schools wouldnt become exinct they get better in the future.
I strongly disagree with opinion A because AI are created to help us, not to be our slaves. And besides, using AI too much will make us lazy. We can't say that we'll stop going to school because machines will do the learning for us. We can't forget that AI is created and developed by humans, so if nobody goes to school, who'll learn how to operate them?
The next generation needs to know how to use AI, and the only way for that to happen is if we learn in school. Don't get me wrong, the school isn't the only learning environment. I'm just saying that there's a lot of things AI can teach, but not everything. There are just some things like good communication, social skills and emotional skills.
I agree because.... we could learn in various forms just like the conversation we are currently having, but learning in a proper school environment lays that firm foundation of different things we hear about;so I think we will still need to go to school even with the existence of AI.
I agree because... AI enhances teaching strategies by giving pupils a good and higher educational opportunity. Through AI interactions, students can access materials outside of the classroom and get feedback, opening up new opportunities for learning and development.
hello
I resolutely agree with this. In the sense that, if we could go back in time to the education of before, education was mediocritical. After all, back then, when it came to research, it was very onerous for students to research to improve their knowledge because back then, people did not have reliable sources or gadgets to help. But now we have AI, which is here to help us and it actually makes it easier to make research about just anything you need.
thank you.👍
I totally disagree with you because old things has past away and behold, new things are existing now. the world is getting better now and not worst. when you stay in your house waiting for AI to do your learnings for you, you might succeed but all fingers are not equal remember. There are non developed areas which needs to improve in their learning and as a matter of fact, there is no AI machines to help them do that so they have to keep pushing and doing the best they can in order to bring up kids.
Hello unbiased planet,
Do not get me wrong by what I said. I do agree to the fact that you cant sit in your house all the waiting for AI to do the job for you. What am I'm saying is that AI is here to make work facile. AI is not here to make you lazy. But recently, on my past research, I have summed it up to say "Technology can take you anywhere you want to go but it all depends on your mindset and how far you want to go".
Hello!
I understand your concern about the future of education. There are many ways to learn without going to school. You can read books, listen to lectures and podcasts from experts in various fields, take online courses from universities and other educational institutions, volunteer, or attend classes offered by local spots in your community However, it is important to note that AI can be a valuable tool for learning, especially when it comes to processing large amounts of data and providing personalized feedback. While AI may not be able to replace human creativity and innovation, it can help us learn more efficiently and effectively. It is up to us to use AI as a tool to enhance our learning, rather than relying on it completely.
I agree because...
AI is helpful because it makes our works easier and faster but if we fully rely on it, it makes us lazy. So, I am trying to say that we all cannot just rest and leave AI do everything for us.
Also, it is known that you can only become lazy if actually you want to be but if you don't want to be lazy, the free time you get frome AI as your helper to do other reasonable things with your self.
I strongly agree with you because the world is getting better not worst, so if a person stays in his or her house waiting for AI to do your learning for you.
I accede to your comment here forceful lemon and really a lot has been said about this. So ill conclude it with what Denzel Washington said "I'll be more frightened by not using whatever abilities I'd be given. I'll be more frightened by procrastination and laziness.". You cannot always sit back and enjoy then what will be the fun of this life. We are here to try new things, experience challenges and become stronger. So, I don't think leaving AI to do everything is worth it.
I'm not sure about this because... AI might be a solution to easier learning but we need humans to learn for themselves, or else later education might only be limited to AI, after all humans are the ones who first made robots, because of this dreams of many future children might be crushed, to have an occupation would be almost impossible.
Hello
I can see where you're coming from fun conclusion. Which is why I say it depends on your mindset. And I don't think anyone will want anything to supersede them. People are different. I don't think AI will be able to take the place of humans. People and children can still achieve their dreams. And also, AI bots do not have the full knowledge that we have all they have is what is inputted in them. We are the ones who enact and improve them I don't think they have the ability to make themselves talk more of supplanting us. Here are some examples of things that AI can't do:
1. To learn continuously
2. To be able to adapt to different situations.
3. To answer puzzled questions.
4. To invent things etc.
yes i agree because without the games we might be bored
I agree because although I am pretty sure that humans will still be in school, I am not completely sure.
I agree, AI might make learning easier, but will humans lose their ambition? A bit like how some people don’t believe they need to be able to do some maths as they have calculators. Will humans say why do I need to know how to do this if a computer can do it for me?
But if you have a rethink, back then despite not having the option of using AI to solve their problems they became creative and thought really hard which gave life to AI itself and many important theories (e.g newton's second law of motion) today unlike people nowadays who totally rely on AI for everything blocking the avenue for them showcasing their creativity to the world and giving life to more inventions better than the past only this time with the help of Artificial intelligence. Rather than totally depending on AI you can actually work with it in making your inventions even better than before. We have a choice now, let's make it count
I agree because... AI will need people to bring more ideas for different new types of AI and that foundation is built from school. AI also helps in the present day schools and even the future, so without school I don't know what will happen in the future instead of bringing more ideas we will be reducing the development of a country and the world.
I agree with brave_ reindeer because people that produce AI need to attend school to acquire the necessary knowledge needed to produce AI and robots. Someone that has a terrible educational background will not be able to think well to make an AI.
Helo,
I feel that an era will come that we may not go to school again.
But I should think that human should find a way to learn without going to school.
We can learn from our peers, parents or the little things in our environment.
But i l feel that it is wrong if human completely reply on AI.
This is because all the AI know is already discovered the fact not new ones. So i feel it will not be safe keeping the learning cabalities of our children in the hands of a machine.
I agree because although AI has its advantages, we can't just be digital and forget about the physical . If we let AI take over schools and we just make a school learning environment digital, there are a lot of difficulties or disadvantages we'll face. An example of the disadvantages we will face is excessive screen time. There are a lot of health risks children would face due to excessive screen time health risks like physical strain to your eyes and body.
We will not only face health risks but due to excessive screen time we can face weakened socialising skills and also weakened emotional judgement and also using screens for long periods have been associated with depression, anxiety and many other mental health disorders. In summary, we cannot just close down schools and let AI take over because although AI has its advantages it also has its disadvantages and we will face many of these disadvantages if we shut down schools and make our learning environment digital.
I strongly agree with you based on what you've said and on the fact that as the AI has a disadvantage it also has an advantage. I would agree that we are in the digital world now but there should always be an equality or balance between the both digital and physical aspect, because too much of both the physical and digital aspect is not bad , so there should always be a balance to enhance learning self related skills which covers the physical aspect and to help in the digital also.
I couldn't agree more, no matter how far we advance in technology there should still be a balance or evenness between the physical and the digital, although we might think sometimes it doesn't really matter but there are a lot of advantages the physical school learning environment provides us. But this doesn't mean we shouldn't make use of the AI technology in our learning environment because AI can aid and also improve our whole learning experience but the important point is that we should not let it take over our physical school learning environment and make it completely digital.
I strongly agree with you cause..... the absence of human touch could make it challenging for students to grasp complex concepts, as AI lacks the ability to comprehend and respond empathetically to students’ emotions. Thus, while AI can efficiently automate various aspects of education, the importance of human teachers and their irreplaceable role in fostering emotional intelligence and critical thinking in students should not be undermined. It might also minimize human interaction,which is a crucial part of learning process.It reduces the face to face communication of both student and teacher which can affect thier social skill
Hello,
I strongly agree with this in retrospect to gaining knowledge. There are a lot of things to learn in school if AI does it for us, I don't think we will gain the right knowledge. From my delving, to improve the human brain, we need to learn how to solve complex problems, learn how to do critical thinking, jigsaw puzzles, etc. But if we seat around to let AI do all the challenging things, I do not think it will be good for us. We need not just to let AI do the job and wait for output we should also build up on our own minds.
I disagree because... what you are saying is that you can learn something while having conversations and that is absolutely not true. That is called listening to people's opinions and debating not learning. According to Wikipedia Learning is the process of acquiring new understanding, knowledge, behaviors, skills, values, attitudes, and preferences. If we could learn through conversations then we would always be talking to babies
Hi helpful_idea,
Thanks for engaging in this discussion! I'm not sure babies have the cognitive ability to help us learn!
What about in a scenario like this:
You are learning about climate change. You live somewhere that doesn't experience the direct impacts of climate change as much as other places. You have a conversation with a scientist who is working in a place that has gone through extreme weather such severe flooding. They share their experience of this and you listen. You ask questions to help you understand more.
In this scenario, would you not learn more about the impact of climate change through conversation?
Hello Tiff @ Topical Talk you partially changed my mind on my opinion, but any time we listen to teachers during lessons and ask questions they tell us that, that is not what learning is about. They say you must research, Analyse, solve questions and watch videos on the topic and then you can say you really learnt.
I agree because humans created this artificial intelligence and without people going to school, the generations to come cannot be able to access this knowledge that we have acquired as of now. Although, AI has been programmed to behave like humans, they cannot do our learning for us. Even though we have programmed them to make our work easier, they cannot learn for us.
Imagine the generations to come do not go to school, they cannot have that sensational feeling of having a one on one conversation with a teacher and there will be no competition among students, that is if there will even be a classroom.
I agree because, yes if they are no schools for the next generation to come to go to, how will they acquire the knowledge and understanding of how to operate the AI, maybe that will be the next time people will start talking about "AI will soon take over human race what will humans do" probably so. So actually yes in the future they will be schools for the next generation to go to, so as I have said before, to acquire more knowledge and also to improve the future of AI. Thank you.
I disagree because... even without schools we could acquire some knowledge. We could have virtual discussions with teachers. During the Corona virus pandemic, we were still able to learn with other sources. AI would definitely not take over the world. With just one added full stop in the coding can destroy AI.
But don't you think that, for those who don't have enough internet can't go into the virtual learning discussion with their teachers don't you agree with me when it comes that of the amount of internet needed which might be difficult for some others who don't have internet .
Does it mean that does who don't have internet can't learn in a formal way of learning?
Thanks.
I'm not sure about this because with the way we are going, we actually are making AI involved in every aspect of life from virtual assistants to even risky jobs like fire fighting, of which AI can actually take over the world if we are not careful, this is because AI has the cognitive ability to gather information and solve problems with that information. If we make AI involved a lot in our schools, we are making we humans lazy and are losing a lot, take a look at the standpoint written by devoted_television titled " The Undermined side effects of AI on the user, this standpoint has been able to teach me that AI is not meant to be involved in everything but should be used moderately, take the example the writer used of the calculator, this shows that if AI gets involved too much in our everyday life it is actually destroying us. In conclusion, if we are not careful with how we are using AI, schools may not exist in the future.
THANK YOU.
I agree because... I believe schools will persist because AI has limitations in teaching settings subjects like creative arts, biology and chemistry. human instructors are crucial as AI cannot address all human problems, perform human duties and comprehensively teach various subjects first I think it is essential for people to continue teaching for a more well rounded education.
I agree because AI has the ability to teach and assist teachers, but cannot and will not take over schools, besides AI lacks the human ability to create or invent something entirely new. It uses the data it trains on and struggles when it faces unfamiliar scenarios or situation. AI doesn't possess human-like understanding, empathy, or intentionality. AI's adaptability is limited and it can't adjust to completely new situations like humans can. So it can't replace some certain jobs.
Exactly, AI can support teachers but won't replace them entirely. Unlike humans, AI lacks creativity and struggles with novel situations. It relies on existing data and falters when confronted with unfamiliar scenarios. Without human-like understanding and empathy, AI's adaptability is limited, hindering its ability to handle unforeseen circumstances. While it has its strengths, there are certain jobs, like teaching, where the unique human touch remains irreplaceable.
I'm not sure about this because... Don't you think that from the rate which AI is being formative and becoming more and more advance Ai will be more improved to be able to reaplcate it own version and probably be able to enhance their own designs to be better. Don't you think so.
So in conclusion, don't you think that the world of education may not exist in the future if the AI bots, are now going to be given the capability to do, as well as the ability to reaplcate thireself.
Thanks.
I agree strongly to this comment because if the next generation don't go to school as they earlier said no one will know how to use AI, apart from this, if people don't go to school, there will be no one to create other AI machines which instead of taking the world forward, it is bringing us back to the past. We also need to remember our predecessors and make sure their efforts are not in vain.
I also agree to this comment,without school existing in the future how would AI exist,because without we humans having knowledge on how to create,operate and manage the AI,robots won't even exist in this world.
So I strongly agree that school should exist in the future.
We agreed with Statement B the most because whilst AI is great to have and use, if we lost technology and had become over reliant on it, we would lose absolutely everything. We need to still learn how to function and take care of ourselves without the support of machinery. Technology can be a great luxury but not a necessity!
I am strongly going for B because, people will always need to learn themselves, even if machines are intelligent, what is intelligence without a free spirit to learn and unlearn things?
In the past, it was believed that we could only learn academics at school but it is not only kind of education that could be acquired; there is a whole lot that could be learnt in schools which include: good morals, how to speak, how to communicate with the environment and humans. We
also learn about health, respect, love, countries, languages and thinking creatively.
If we don’t go to school to learn and only interact virtually through phones, laptops and other devices, it can cause mental or physical health issues which can harm us and even make us anti-social.
I agree with your comment strongly , people need to learn for themsleves to understand and learn things better. though machines are intelligent ,I believe we humans can be as intelligent as AI by have the urge to study . collaborating with people can help with their analytical skills , interacting with people can help us learn many things. I believe that even humans can be intelligent as AI by reading and communicating with the enviroment and others students.
I agree with you active coconut because if we come to school and AI is there doing all your work for you, you won't know how to do anything or think for yourself. You talk about morals, how to speak and communicate with the environment. We also learn how to be safe in our environment and sometimes learn this through our mistakes. If AI did everything for us we could lose our emotions and our ability to make good choices.
I agree because we are not only learning reading and writing in school we also learn morals and values. We will need schools because it is not everything that AI will do. Sometimes you can be confused when AI is giving you anwers to you. It can use new words and if you don't go to school, you will be curious to know the meaning of the word. At the time you will be wishing that there are schools so that you can know the meaning of the word.
Hello unparalleled nature
I totally agree with you because technology is great so is AI but if machines do all the learning for us we will not how to get a good job then we won't be able to buy essentials for us and our family. AI will also make us more addicted to our devices and we wouldn't be socialising with each other which is not very good for our mental health.
What training do you think teachers will need to learn how to use AI in the classroom?
well, it is becoming very important that teachers should accept the AI and use it as a tool for learning because it has it setbacks and its benefits.
From my research I noticed that "The problem is nearly half of educators (45 percent) said they’re uncomfortable with AI technology that they’ve encountered or expect to encounter in the next year in their classroom, according to an EdWeek Research Center survey of 1,301 district leaders, principals, and teachers conducted from June 20 to July 14. Thirty-six percent said they were comfortable with the technology."
Now the question is why are they uncomfortable, I feel the educator can get more comfortable with it they need to see it as a help and it is high time they should it as a way to approach students differently.
Basically a they need is time to get to understand it.
Though you made a good point reasoning_knowledge, you exposed alot of facts regarding AI and how it helps teaching, but you failed to realize the danger with getting too comfortable with using AI. The main factor that helped in the creation of AI was human's research all through the years, these researches helped us to evolve and continue to advance, we can't depend too much on AI because it has its own risks and consequences. Becoming too comfortable with AI will lead to the declination of our intellectual capacity because most of the critical thinking we do without the help of AI will be stopped. I'm not saying we shouldn't get familiar with AI, in fact, I believe we should utilize it into a tool for greater achievements but we all shouldn't get too comfortable with the AI, considering the probability of AI overthrowing humans, I think
Hi,
I agree with you AI has its drawbacks , don't forget we humans are the ones that made it but its advantages to us are much compared to its disadvantages. Like in the aspect of people thinking that AI can take over in the nearest future , in my opinion I think that it is highly unlikely because AI will only work on what we feed them, and honestly it is going to be the fault of the humans if they decide to heed into the declination of they're intellectual capacity, because the technology was made to help us increase the intellectual capacity in question and not to become complete slaves to are unending needs and wants. AI shouldn't do the learning for us but rather like you said it should increase our chances of making great achievements in the future due to our intelligence and AI's help. Just imagine Isaac Newton who made a lot of great achievements of which we learn of today and also make reference to had AI, his achievements would have been more that we could imagine not only him but many other intelligent people that we still remember today. So my whole point is that we shouldn't depend on AI to make great achievements for us but instead we should be challenged to learn even more so that with your knowledge you would be able to use AI to make achievements that will be recorded in history.
Thank you!
I'm not sure about this because... I believe that they have a particular reason why they feel what they feel. Some of them may believe that the introduction of AI in their classroom may have a negative effect on the students. I mean, we can't really blame them, AI can be addictive. Maybe they are looking at the adverse effects of AI. Maybe they believe that their students will grow to depend too much on AI instead of their own knowledge and skills. We should try to look at things from an equal and well balanced point of view. We should look at the advantages as well as the disadvantages of AI. Yes, i can agree that AI is a big help but too much of it will not help anyone in any way.
There is a variety of ways AI can be used in classrooms, it just depends on the aim the teacher plans to achieve. AI can be utilized in making tests that cover a lot of topics within seconds for students, you can also use it to research for latest technological advancements to keep the students up to date on information, this doesn't just apply to the area of science and technology but also with matters relating to society and art. Though AI comes with a billion and one advantages, we should also be careful not to become slaves of our own creation because people sometimes abuse the privilege of having AI. I would like to make reference to a trending video in my society of a graduating student who gives thanks to chatgpt for helping him with all his assignments, this may seem funny but honestly, it's disgraceful that a student can't do his assignments by himself, to somepeople he is making the right use of technology but in reality he isn't maximizing his full potential but instead relying on the AI to do all the work.
In summary, having the leisure of partaking in the various capabilities of the AI, we shouldn't depending solely on it but instead also push our limits.
I agree because... AI could be beneficial in teaching in the sense that AI may be used to personalize gaining knowledge for every student. This means that students can learn at their personal tempo and recognition in the regions where they need the most help. The advantage is mostly to assist overwhelmed teachers with personalised reporting that can help teachers tailor their lessons.
Hi, Emma i think teachers will need training on AI basics, integrating AI into lessons for personalize learning, guide students how to properly use AI and understanding basic ethics in ai why do i say this ?i am saying this because this kind of training is crucial for instructors to effectively integrate AI into their teaching strategies, enabling personalized learning and tailored recommendations for individual students. Additionally, understanding the ethical considerations of AI adoption in the academic field is essential to ensure responsible and moral use. By participating in this training, teachers can harness the potential of AI while promoting a helpful and ethical age.
I agree that teachers will need training because... AI is very effective and informative and collects data from the internet about a topic and gives a deeper understanding. If teachers use this they have more information and an added resource. I personally think AI is also very confusing to use because it uses lots of big words that can't be understood easily so teachers must use it so they will be able to break down the information for us to process. I think we must also be thought how to use AI because:
It's supposed to help us do the work not to do it for us. It's very obvious for a teacher to identify a student who has used AI because we just copy and paste the words.
Teachers play a crucial role in children's education, not only teaching but also as mentors, confidant, and friends. To effectively integrate AI tools into classrooms, teachers should receive comprehensive training, including understanding technology and leveling it students' learning speed. This training ensures that AI can teach at students' pace and support their overall learning experience.
In this present generation, any teacher who is not literate, in the sense that the teacher is able to handle any device that comes his or her way, the teacher or supervisor will have to go for the training because no school is still making use of any analogue devices to teach so for me, the training of handling AI equipment is the training that will help them.
I respectfully disagree with your point concerning schools and analogue devices, my reason being that it's not a fact that the use of analogue devices in learning has been put to stop. In my school, we still make use of analogue devices, this doesn't mean that we aren't exposed to AI, in fact we make use of both methods in teaching. One thing that most people don't know is that applying the analogue method has its own positive effects, it will interest you to know that make use of analogue instruments increases the student's creativity, enhances fine motor skills and even prevents eye straining. These little things contribute to the student's development while preparing them for the future, believe me, if only digital methods of learning were used, it will have a negative effect on the efficiency of human resources. In summary, instead of utilizing just the digital method of learning, why don't we make a combination of both digital and analogue.
The reason why we cannot combine the both is the fact that old things has passed away and when we made use of analogue devices, it was not as interesting as the digital devices. In schools where they make use of chalk boards, you will realise that at the end of every class, a teacher will be stained by the chalk or the teacher will start looking for water to wash his or her hand. Now AI has provided laptops and computers with projectors, a teacher can just come into the classroom, instead of copying note, the teacher will easily connect the laptop to the projector and 'boom' everything will be displayed. A teacher can also stay out of class and send notes into the Google classroom for the students. So you see, AI still remains the best method of learning.
Hello unbiased_planet.
Yes, i agree that analogue devices are a bit hard on the teachers. The situation you gave with the black board is a good example. Yet, with the introduction of too much AI into the education system, students might come to rely too much on it. For example, a manual car takes a lot of practice to learn to drive. Once you learn how to drive it, an automatic car will be seamless to you. In the same way, someone whose learning process was not fully automated will be able to operate anywhere and everywhere. They won't rely on AI up to an extent that they won't be able to operate without it. Yes, AI makes teaching and learning easier but it is also really easy to become dependent on it. If someone who was taught with an interactive board switches to a black board, their attention span will be greatly reduced but if someone is taught with both of them, they will be able to concentrate no matter the situation or the classroom environment.
I'm not sure about this because... Though the world is fast changing everyday with the introduction of new gadgets, we can't completely abandon the old ways. Don't get me wrong, i don't mean we shouldn't evolve, i mean we should evolve with them. We can turn previously analogue devices to digital devices. A good example of this is the normal whiteboard and the interactive whiteboard. Without a doubt the idea for an interactive board can from an already existing whiteboard. The conception of an interactive whiteboard created a lot of new experiences in the classroom but we should not forget that it is just a successor of its analogue predecessor, the normal whiteboard. Digital devices are easier to use and they do reduce a lot of work load but analogue devices aren't completely useless. We just need to find a way to enhance them.
I understand your point intelligent orchard and I do agree with you. I also encourage the use of AI gadgets as an AID to learning not a replacement to it. There are some or even many old ways of learning and teaching both students and teachers themselves will miss if AI were to take over. One way or the other, we obviously can't completely get rid of the old methods of education/learning.
Thank You
I know this question wasn't directed to be, but I could give my opinion about it. There was a time in my country when most teachers only could give out knowledge to their students by teaching directly on the board and dishing out all the knowledge to them, leaving them with little or no areas to go research to broaden their knowledge. Now it is different, teachers can now use different technological devices to upgrade their teaching skills, bring up discussion topics for their students to go work on, and download videos for them to watch and learn. Using computer devices in the educational system has helped teachers understand the strengths and weaknesses of their students and diversify different means to meet them halfway.
Even in the aspect of spoken English, some teachers have been able to undergo online classes and pieces of training which have helped them advance in their proficiency. All these wouldn't have been possible if not for AI, because it would have been difficult to undergo these learning processes while combining it with work.
To use AI in the classroom, teachers will need to be equipped with the necessary skills and knowledge to integrate AI into their teaching practices. Some of the skills that teachers may need include:
1.Data literacy: Teachers should be able to understand and interpret data to make informed decisions about how to use AI in the classroom.
2.Programming skills: Teachers should have a basic understanding of programming languages such as Python, which is commonly used in AI development.
3.Critical thinking: Teachers should be able to evaluate the effectiveness of AI tools and their impact on student learning .
4.Ethical considerations: Teachers should be aware of the ethical implications of using AI in the classroom and be able to teach students about these issues.
There are several resources available to help teachers learn how to use AI in the classroom. For example, OpenAI has released a guide for teachers using ChatGPT in their classroom, which includes suggested prompts, an explanation of how ChatGPT works and its limitations.
In the future I believe that both teachers and Artificial Intelligence will be used in the education and learning system.
This is because, if teachers gain the necessary knowledge needed to implement AI in their work it can increase their efficiency and reduce the workload. Some areas where AI can help teachers include:
1. Providing Student Feedback
2. Improved virtual learning
3. Pinpointing Knowledge Gaps
4. Auto Grading
5. Course and Lesson Plan Creation, and so many more.
The moment people and teachers understand that AI is more of a tool and blessing rather than a weapon and a curse it will lead to a huge technological breakthrough. "Artificial intelligence is not a substitute for human intelligence; it is a tool to amplify human creativity and ingenuity.”
I disagree because... I feel your comment seems one-sided in terms of how teachers should be the only ones requiring the necessary training. People used to study without AI back in the day, and those methods are still being implemented only in a few schools, mostly the ones without the funds to acquire AI, and from my observation, they carry out a lot of good solutions to problems on our planet. I'll refer to schools in India, especially because most of their solutions give us ideas for finding solutions as well. AI's presence has adjusted our learning scheme, but they also have to dominate fully in the educational sector, given some of the points you listed and more.
Yes, Ai might possess some qualities unlike human teachers like emotions which are required, etc. Have you ever wondered how the great scientists of way back made their inventions, conclusions, or observations without AI? They did research! Yes, things must and has evolved, but certain principles that are key to making them recognized, to this day, seem to be fading into the hands of AI. But in the present time, children are using AI models to complete homework and answer mind-boggling questions, and interns are even using AI to get positions that aren't properly theirs. With AI, it seems certain tasks don't have to be stressful, which is why it's so reliable. because it is the fastest and easiest way to complete and execute tasks. On the contrary, it weakens the brain's ability to process answers and more innovative thoughts faster and better than it naturally could. Not to mention the increase in carbon footprint since everyone's using it. I personally got to hear of ChatGPT from my teachers in schools who use it to submit sub-reports, set questions, and more. According to them, all they have to do is "input the command and let AI do the rest." If this mindset isn't changed in educational sectors now, children are finding AI tools as companions instead of books. For instance, a university graduate with high honors uses AI to fill out his master's application and apply for job offers that he has no experience with, just for some good-paying jobs or some level of respect that he doesn't deserve. It got me thinking: with adults and children having this mindset, are they doomed to submit to AI as it dominates in more fields, or can that mindset be changed to create a sustainable balance now before it is too late? Can people ever go back to the best way of finding research—books and experimental work—or is it AI all the way?
In conclusion, I don't think schools will exist anymore when students use AI for everything, leaving their natural, sharp thinking skills idle. Children can also get emotional assistance from parents and friends when needed, but then again, it seems like no one needs emotions when AI does almost everything for you.
Well done for replying to another comment.
That is a nice question Emma @ The Economist because Teachers incorporating AI into the classroom will benefit from training in AI basics and ensuring they can effectively guide students in using these technologies. they should be versed in data privacy and ethical considerations related to AI in education. Ongoing professional development will be to keep up with evolving AI applications.
Looking forward to corrections.
Thank you
I strongly agree with you reasoning_knowledge because, the school is a vital institution for learning and acquiring basic and essential skills required, such as life coping skills, communication skills, critical thinking skills, time management, collaboration skills, problem solving and enables one to be more creative, so the machines we use can't help us to require such vital skills.
So I also strongly disagree with the opinion A.
Hello!
I also agree with you, yes school is a vital institution required for learning various formal education processes as most of our job occupations have come to need in our modern day but school is not the only place we learn from. I mean we learn from various places such as religious institutions, social gatherings, the Internet, and our family members and friends, so yes I think schools will still exist but not as much emphasis will be placed on the formal side of education rather on the informal and soft skills coupled with the formal education.
I agree with the points written by @reasoning_knowledge but no one has seen the future and we don't know if AI will replace jobs of people or not. AI is just a invention of human beings made for making the work easier and faster but its us human beings who are using it. It cannot be guaranteed that schools might be necessary in future even after development of AI or machines in field of education. Also, it is true AI will make us lazy but is it really the fault of AI for making us too much dependent on it and making us lazy? No, it depends on us, ourselves as if we insist on being dependent on every single work over AI, it will make us lazy but if we insist on doing things ourselves, not depending too much on AI we might not have to face problem of laziness. It is true that school can teach us good communication, social skills as it helps us to cooperate but as much as we know, AI is developed by us humans by programming data and information from internet. Thus, if we might install or program social skills, etc in AI too it might help us to develop social skills, etc like school teaches us.
I appreciate your perspective. It's true that we can't predict the future, but your point about AI and schools is intriguing.
Indeed, whether AI will take over schools or not is in our hands as humans, besides, we are the makers of AI, its future still lies in our hands. Whether it will produce good results or it does the opposite, it's still in our hands, that's one fact in all these and that's what I wish my fellow colleagues to know. Luckily for this generation, we were born in the age of AI, but now it's our turn to move things from here, our turn to advance human intelligence with the use of AI and I want us to make good use of it.
I appreciate your thought but do you think that there would be people like you wanting to use AI for good use. AI has unimaginable power that can control even us humans if we think about it. There might be some people wanting to use AI for their own purpose. Not every one of us humans think the same but we cross the path of each others and go past different thoughts. Indeed we are the makers of AI, but do you think that the power of AI will remain in the hands of people like you. Though it might sound like some fictional thing but unfortunately not every one would be using it for good purpose.
I disagree because I feel you are looking at this through the wrong angle. The fact that we are not going to school does not mean that we will seat at home jobless and just while away time. Fact has proven that most of the big men in the world today are drop outs see the likes of Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Oprah Winfrey, Mark Zuckerberg, Jay Z and others, see the Musicians and footballers we have, all make big money and they did it without school. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that going to school is wrong, the thing is when the stress of school is taken out of the picture, it gives the human more time to think outside the box, be innovative, cook up money making schemes and also develop their talents and personal skills.
I agree with you, and I also agree with point B, because Learning is a fundamental part of the human experience, even though AI can be really intelligent can and provide us with valuable information, there are things that only we can do, like social learning and collaboration, intuition and creativity and so on. When we learn for ourselves we gain a deeper understanding and develop unique perspectives. It’s like a personal journey of discovery and growth. It empowers us to explore our passion, overcome challenges and grow as individuals. Machines can provide information and help us learn, but they cannot replicate our human experiences, creativity or emotions. Machines can assist and enhance our learning journey, but the personal experience of discovery and growth will always remain a vital part of being human. Learning ourselves allows us to think critically, solve problems and make connections in a way that is special to us. So let’s embrace the power of our own learning and keep exploring the world around us.
I agree because... AI is created by humans so when we say we won't go to school we are saying that we don't need AI because we are the source everything AI can do is because we made it happen but now we are relying on what we have created and this is not good for our mental health since it also requires us to be around people, not technology.
More we are making our critical thinking weak and damaging our mental health.
I agree with opinion B because there are some things that artificial intelligence can't help with, you'll have to aquire your own knowledge even if machines can do the learning for you, not every thing can be understandable by machines.
Machines are just there to assist not to do everything for you.
I agree with you although AI can help with learning there is a certain depth to human perception that comes from firsthand experience. while robots are useful tools they cannot fully replace the depth of human cognition.
I too went with option B since, while AI may educate and explain, it cannot replace human knowledge acquisition. We must educate ourselves to get additional knowledge. Humans will take their time to understand a subject and find ways to impart it to their students so they may study a wide range of subjects. An AI will not disseminate information in the same manner that a human would. To help us comprehend the material better, one of my professors, for example, takes his time to clarify what he is teaching and engages the class in participatory activities. Furthermore, because AI is designed, it would not take the time or effort to explain further.
I agree with reasoning knowledge, because when they said "machines will do the leaning for us" do they expect to sit down and be lazy just searching or leaning stuff from AI, let's not forget we humans are who created AI, so all I say is that we should be going to school and learn even if the machine would help us in some ways
Thank you
Yes, I agree with you're opinion because it is very logical and it is basically true that AI are not our slaves they are for our help and if nobody goes to any types educational institutes there knowledge might be very less than a normal human and also AI cannot make us feel like they're humans too, because they usually don't know how to treat anyone because they're just the technology which interacts like humans not completely humans
I agree with you because if we depend on AI robots it will make us lazy and unproductive. And also if we stop going to school,teachers will loose their jobs which will lead to unemployment
I agree on your opinion . Educational systems are likely to continue to exist in some form in the future. However, the methods and structures may change with the development of technology and the development of pedagogy. Learning and skills are essential, so education systems are likely to evolve with the needs of society.
I agree because...how can an invention do something its creator did?
Can you imagine a robot going to school and going through the same learning process, while humans are at home just being lazy?
Firstly,"if people don't go to school, there will be no one to create other AI machines which instead of taking the world forward, it is bringing us back to the past". Just as brave_reindeer said this problem is a very dangerous one and if we are not careful on how we depend on AI this problem will not be avoided.Think about what would happen if AI took over the world. Based on recent research if AI would become smarter than humans, there will be loss of control over the world by humans but the world will be controlled by AI, and if they go to school and become more intelligent and gain more knowledge than that give to them by humans, they will even develop minds of their own and even make humans their slaves who made them to originally be their slaves.
Secondly, if AI goes to school and many humans don't, schools may even become bigger and better, but the only problem with this is humans can be discriminated if they go to school because they can't think as fast as AI.
Finally, humans could go extinct if we don't go to school because AI can be taught how to even make other AI machines and could wipe out the entire human race.
In conclusion I strongly disagree to option A.
I agree because... AI is a programmed algorithm created by humans, so if humans stop going to school how will the AI operate? In addition, if AI does the learning for us how will practice specific skills, using too much AI may reduce our critical thinking skills.
I agree with you for when you said we can't overuse AI because we will turn lazy and will make AI our slaves which is what AI was not made for at all. And how you said there are things that AI can't teach us humans. You were 100% correct in your statement and I just relate and agree with you for so many more reasons.
reasoning knowledge, I strongly agree with you if we let AI devices take control then it clearly means we are their slaves. Also, in the next generation what if the child's parents are dead the AI device doesn't know anything about Emotional intelligence so if the baby is crying the robot will not know what to do.
Hi joyous_ fact. I appreciate your point of view however, I disagree with your statement because you said " it clearly means we are their slaves". I feel that we can never be their slaves because humans created them so we are the ones who know how to control them by reprogramming them when humans realise that the robots are becoming too authoritative. Also, I don't think that a parent will leave their child for a robot and even if they do so, they will programme it to take care of the baby when they are dead then probably, family members will come and take the child to take care of
that child when they are older or else, family members can take the baby to take care of the baby till they grow.
Thank you.
This is what I think.
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO RESPOND TO MY COMMENT 😃😃🤗💯👍
I disagree because... you are saying we are their slaves of AI which is impossible. If a teacher lets a student take over the class does that mean the teacher is the slave of the student? How can a creator be a slave of something they created to help them?
Dear helpful_idea, I did say that it means we are their slaves.
But in your case the teacher is letting the child share their point of view. Teachers let students have presentation they do this to improve self-confidence and collaboration techniques.
This time AI devices are taking over the jobs but not assisting students.
This leads to unemployment.
I strongly agree with you. We are overusing AI. We use it for homework, presentations, art project, research works ... It is making us lazy and reducing our critical thinking skills. It is not fully reliable. It sometimes gives wrong information. Always using AI is not good. Unfortunately for the AI abusers, devices are not allowed in the examination hall.
Hi helpful_ idea. I feel that your perspective is special and helpful indeed. However, I feel that AI does not give wrong information because for example: if you search that how many people are on planet Earth, it will answer that: ABOUT 7 billion to show that it does not have the real answer but it is an accurate and approximate answer so this is not a wrong information but accurate. I feel that AI is reliable because almost all of the information that even teachers use to teach is information provided by AI. If a teacher teaches you a particular topic and you research online, it is basically the same thing. I also feel that when we use AI for research, presentations and art projects, it doesn't mean that we are overusing it and it doesn't make us lazy because research broadens our understanding because let us assume that you have been taught a mathematical formula and you don't understand it, then AI breaks it down to make it even more easier to comprehend. It doesn't make us lazy too because it improves our analysis and research skills because we will have to open many sites , get information before even breaking it down into pieces we can understand ( analysis). It also means that we do not always rely on the first information that pops up on the screen but rather delve into detail.
THANK YOU
😃😃🤗👊
That's a great point. If nobody goes to school, then nobody will know how to operate the technology. Eventually, it might even disappear, due to the lack of staff to fix certain problems. So, people must continue to go to school. I'm really curious about what schools will look like in the future. By now, if you compare a school from 100 years ago with one nowadays, you won't notice much of a difference. The classrooms look pretty much the same, it's just that the chalk has been replaced by markers, but not in every classroom. The teaching methods have evolved, but they are still similar to the ones from 100 years ago. However, when you look at a car, from 100 years ago and nowadays, the change is so clear. They look nothing alike. So instead of focusing on developing the technology further, I'd suggest we start to develop our schools. How have we come to even considering closing the educational system? It is unbelievable how easily this got into discussion. I would love to change other people's minds and bring them this appetite for learning new things that I experience. I’d suggest we start to develop our schools. For example, we could exclude certain subjects that don't teach anything useful for this era. Instead, let's add subjects that prepare students for this long journey called life. In my opinion, there should be more classes about working with technology and building robots. The most important part about this is to find teachers that put all their interest into teaching. School is full of subjects which are badly taught and students hate them. Another important aspect is that we should keep the classes that encourage creativity and hard work, such as art class, storytelling and science. We need future scientists. We need future writers. We need future artists.
I strongly disagree with opinion A but I agree with opinion B because I believe schools will persist in the future because individuals may struggle to learn independently, facing potential laziness and joblessness due to a lack of education. Without learning, essential industries such as banking, insurance, and aerospace could dwindle, affecting people's income sources. However, it's crucial for people to recognize the importance of education.
I agree with you my dear friend🙂,because I see no reason why we shouldn't go to school in future because of AI,yes AI has the potential to shore up good formation in education. For instance, AI-powered computer vision and voice-to-text application can significantly boost school accessibility for students with visual and hearing impairments. AI can also reduce teachers stress, especially in places where teachers’ capability are not much. However human educators must remain firm to teaching and learning.but the idea of AI replacing teachers remains and will always remain unlikely to me .and besides I think no one can be able to replace our teachers why because, They teach us new things and help us note our passions. They challenge us to reach our highest potential and believe we can achieve whatever we set our minds and focus to. They help us build a love for learning by making lessons incredible. No attainment is too small in their mist , they celebrate every milestone we reach.
Thank you 😊
I agree because... if AI was to take over everything we did the real question would be would we exsist in the future. Also AI is generated to only do so much and although they can work like humans we shouldnt let them replace us.
What can we put in place to make sure this doesn't happen?
I agree because... Nowadays people are being too much dependent on machines. Being dependent on machine means being a lazy. We should always be independent. We will still need to go to school because the things like good communication skill, good speaking skill, good leadership can be taught completely only in school. If people decide to left out the school then there will be no futur of AI because humans are the creator of AI and to instruct the AI we need study and skills which is learnt in school. Humans are the creators of AI and the destructor of AI.
Greetings!
Today, I'd like to share my thoughts on what reasoning knowledge is saying. I wholeheartedly agree with the points made regarding this topic. As previously stated, both the current and upcoming generations still require access to formal education. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is tailored to its specific design function; for instance, an AI program designed for cooking would not be proficient in cleaning. It's worth emphasizing that experiencing failure is a vital aspect of human growth and development. While it may not be enjoyable, it's an essential learning experience that enables individuals to learn from their mistakes. If AI technology continues to handle our daily tasks, such as cooking, cleaning, and dressing, we risk becoming overly reliant on it. In the event of a catastrophic AI failure, we may find ourselves incapable of independent thinking and unable to care for ourselves, leading to disastrous consequences.
I am grateful for the opportunity to be of service.
I agree because every person on this planet that have created an AI had to go through school in order to gain the knowledge on how to be inventors. For instance, Bill Gates and Paul Allen would not have created Microsoft without going through school, even with the presence of AI I strongly believe that schools will still be in existence because there are some situations that an AI can become uncontrollable, and educated people are needed in order to gain control of them.
I agree with you about the role of intelligence in our lives. It is important to know that the purpose of intelligence is not to completely replace our abilities, but to help and improve them. Your concern about the potential laziness that over-reliance on AI can lead to is valid and points to the need for balance. Your views on the human role in creating and maintaining intelligence are widely accepted. As designers of these technologies, we must understand how to operate and manage them. You also emphasize the importance of traditional education in teaching non-renewable skills such as communication, intelligence, and emotional IQ. The next generation needs to learn how to use artificial intelligence, and schools play an important role in providing this education; This is a similar idea to the idea that collective Community wisdom should be considered and shared. Your thoughts highlight the importance of realizing the benefits of artificial intelligence while preserving and enhancing human values.
I strongly agree with your opinion especially the bit that states "using AI too much makes us lazy.", for I've encountered several people who use AI constantly with making essays, claiming AI generated art, simply finding answers, etc. The more reliable AI tools become the less scholars will actually attempt to be dependent on their own gathered knowledge, which weakens and harms one's mastering of certain content. Without scholars doing school work on their own they aren't necessarily learning anything, therefore they could lack these future skills for the rest of their lives if never attempting on their own again.
I also agree deeply with the aspect of good communication, social skills, and emotional skills for AI or robots that won't be able to articulate human-like skills like those previously mentioned. Although in the future this could be achieved but it won't feel the same, since the significance of real human emotions/words gives connection and real living scenarios. To add on hand gestures, facial movements, body structure can also impact on ones learning for those who learn better visually.
Your perspective emphasizes the importance of human involvement in learning and using AI responsibly. Acknowledging that AI is a tool, not a replacement, and highlighting the irreplaceable aspects of human skills, such as communication and emotional intelligence, is crucial. Balancing education with technological advancements is key for a well-rounded understanding and utilization of AI.
I object to this because... If you say we should stay at home while AI do the learning for us, how are we supposed to be intelligent to create higher technologies. AI is meant to assist us and make our work much more easier and not the other way round. Now you are insinuating that AI doing the learning for us might make us succeed but you should also remember that what a person doesn't learn he/she can't know it meaning the invention of AI was possible due to human intelligence and what probably the inventor leant in school. Human intelligence created AI, now you want the same AI to learn for humans and leaving humans with no intelligence. AI is surely going to have supremacy over us.
Thank you.
What rules or regulations could be put in place to make sure that AI does not have "supremacy over us"?
I agree because AI was created by humans, and, as you stated "AI is meant to assist us." It is us humans that need to be educated further so we can develop this world and technology around us. Many people around the world already rely on technology slightly too much. Although it may be fascinating it can also be dangerous to our health so we need to be careful about how much we do rely on technology.
Hi reasoning_knowledge
I agree because as you have said AI was created by humans if the didn't go to school I am sure they wouldn't have had enough knowledge to create Artificial Intelligence. AI is suppose aids in teaching and not completely take over.
There is still lots more to learning in school than E-learning. Learning in school helps you to be more concentrated and focused. School teaches you a lot of things that you would not be able to learn elsewhere.
I agree because a school is a place where learning takes place and knowledge to improve our society is being acquired. We humans created AI and and we have to go to school in order to learn how to operate them. We humans must not forget that the AI that we created is not perfect, so we have to go to school to acquire knowledge on how to use them.
I agree because AI is making us lazy and like if we were lazy then how are we going to get fresh air or go outside. Also how are we going to learn. AI is making us not go school also who's going to learn.AI is trying to rule the world
Are there also ways that AI could help us be more productive?
I strongly agree because humans made AI so we should be always there to operate it and endure whatever it brings, whether good or bad. AI is supposed to be helpers and not devices that will do practically everything for us. Also, we cannot learn soft skills from AI devices but from other colleagues.
I agree because... AI is to help us in school not to take over our education, and even if they learn for us how are they supposed transfer everything they learnt into our brain as our knowledge, that is why students' education should not be given to AI or bots, this makes a learner lazy thinking an AI can do all the learning.
I agree because... even though AI can assist learning and provide valuable resources, schools provide structured learning environments and teacher guidance, contributing to a well-rounded education. Also, traditional education offers a holistic approach, critical thinking, social skills, and practical experiences that AI can't fully replicate. In summary, we humans who created AI can't let what we created teach us.
Looking forward to corrections
Thank you
I agree with you... AI is meant to help us and not replace us. Don't forget that without us, AI would not be created. AI might be just the begining...I think that in the future AI will continue to evolve and become even more useful into our daily lives. Also I think AI would never be able to stimulate all human senses and AI will never pass the human's mind. So depending on AI will never benefit the human kind.
I agree because... school isn't only a place to learn academics, it is also a place for having fun, learning values, communicative skills, socializing and others. If humans stop going to school we wouldn't be able to manage the AI we created and we might lose some of the little thing aside from academics school add to our lives. AI isn't something that is supposed to learn for us, it is something created to make school life easier and enhance our access to various information. Back in the days, students would have to move from libraries to libraries in search of information which was very stressful but with AI this has completely changed. I remember a story my mom was telling me about her school life, in those days they didn't have a conducive environment for learning. Class was usually rowdy so students who were serious couldn't get anything from the teachers and they would have to go through series of begging sessions before the teachers would give them little resources. Fortunately now we are so lucky because even if we miss class we can always go online to research. In my opinion school should continue to exist while AI should be a helping hand.
I completely agree with you reasooning_ knowledge, the reason being is that it is true that AI is developed and created by humans, thus if we don't go to school, there will be no one to create AI for us humans to use for assistance. Moreover, as you said, communication, social skills and emotional skills cannot be taught by AI, and these skills are needed by humans in order to have better cooperation with other people. Thus, if we don't go to school, how will we acquire these skills?
I strongly agree with you reasoning_knowledge because if we depend on Artificial Intelligence, it will make the learner's lazy and not productive,and if we stop going to school or stop learning,teachers will lose their jobs and school's will be empty which will lead to employment/jobless.whiles children who don't attend school face issues like illiteracy, poverty, unemployment in future.
Actually all what you are said are true but for your comment I personally have a question for you, which is about AI not being our selves if AI bots are created personally speaking won't you like it to do some of the tasks you wish not to do just to probably have fun with you friend or do other recreational activities? Isn't it possible for an AI powdered mechanism to transfer it's imputed knowledge it another host or rather call it human? Is there any difference between formal and informal method of learning because I know for sure that humans can learn informally so will there be any need for schools in the future in actually sense? I hope this few questions of mine will answered and also be taken to note. Thanks .
Hi reasoning_knowledge, I agree with the comment that you made. I agree that AI is created to help us and not to do almost everything for us. If we ever stop going to school because of AI robots, we will start depending on AI for everything. We need to learn that even though AI is here to help us with some things, it can't just do everything for us. We have to do stuff independently even if AI can do it for us. We can't lose our independence to an AI machine.
Hi reasoning knowledge,
I actually concur with your opinion, because in various forms just as allowing peach said in the hub towards your comment could form a nonprofit learning environment because of the lack of conversational discussion so as also to increase the students vocabulary for proper ablity to speak fluently, which later taught and learnt properly will be good for easy communication of language. But not forgetting AI has it own personal benefits whereby the AI bots and teachers should walk hand in hand so as to achieve a common goal on setting up a generation of individuals who can properly speak and write fluently.
So in conclusion what I am trying to say is that, in the world of AI the humans should also walk hand in hand so as to achieve a common goal to improve the world for a better living and livelihood for humans and also I will say no matter how you are experienced with the use of AI you still need to go to school. Thanks
I also agree with opinion C, because there a lot of things we humans have to do that AI might not be an assistance with. Personally for me school enhances our emotions and consciousness which AI does not have at all. With school and the aid of teachers, we would learn to cope with one another with the help of our emotions but then since AI does not have emotions it may cause a hinderance.
I agree because... I believe that AI cannot easily take over human emotions. While it may be skilled at detecting our emotions, it cannot truly comprehend them. As a result, I don't think it would be able to explain emotions to young people in the same way that schools do.
I agree with you, reflective_ cymbals. I feel that even in the midst of AI there should be urgent need for people or rather us as students to learn for ourselves. It is very essential because it help us have a sense of control and personal progress. It allows you to take ownership of your learning journey, which means that you can develop and progress at your own stride.
I agree because... School includes so many things than learning information.Skills such as social, emotional, cultural, extracurricular activities and so many more, which AI cannot relate with.It also enhances our consciousness which is why school will exist in the future because it is beyond transfer of information
I acquiesce with you because... they are lots of things we do in school apart from the regular class, we meet other humans like us giving us a sense of acceptance and making us free to express ourselves easily.
But AI can be friend to a human.
For example, you have a group of friends, you can do a group reading with them, it can be more interesting when you ask each other questions after reading. Also at school we have teacher who don't only teach us but correct and maybe punish us when we are wrong, all this AI can be able to do.
Thank you
Yes I agree the fact that AI can do all this but, there will just be something missing. Some of us are in boarding schools faraway from home, teachers tend to show that love and affection that parents give to us their children and we all know that AI doesn't have emotions so there is no way they can act in place of teachers in this aspect.
Yes teachers punish us right but then so do our guardians, they are doing this to correct our wrong behaviors and make sure we don repeat it again. Also who would you prefer to punish you a teacher who has emotions and compassion or an AI that doesn't have any of those.
I agree with option C too. School is not only just about learning information. It’s medium where we gain other life experiences. A school is a foundation of every society and advancement of every technological base. Machines can’t work without human resources; it works based on the data input of humans. Schools don’t only help with information but can also help with morals that could be useful in our life. If we don’t have morals, we will not have proper guideline through life.
School can also help to build and sustain relationships between teachers and students. It could make you more confident if you have many friends and acquaintances. And if you have relationship with teachers you will understand the subject better.
In conclusion school still has to exist. Thank you
Do you think that in the future robots will be able to teach things like morals and how to build relationships with others?
Yes, I believe they can teach morals and tell stories just as well. They can also teach people how to build relationships with one another. While I am not so sure about what will happen soon I feel If the robots are well modified, they can eventually build relationships, maybe feel emotion, and accomplish a great deal more than humans are capable of. What the future holds remains to be seen.
Hello,
I strongly agree with your point. I believe support from your teachers is important. Their encouragement can give you the motivation to try harder, especially if you don't have anyone else who supports you. I know the support of my teachers does mean a lot to me and I am glad that they have faith in me. A robot wouldn't give the same effect knowing they don't have emotions, which means they can't care for you emotionally.
Do you think it will always be the case that robots don't have emotions? Or might this change one day?
Well I don't believe that AI will have emotions one day because, emotions are things that come from the heart and we all are fully aware that the AI does not have a heart. Even if software engineers try their very best to create a mechanical heart for them it would still lack emotions. Also AI doesn't posses the biological systems that generate emotions in humans. While it can mimic emotional responses, it doesn't “feel” them.
Hello,
For robots to have emotions, they would have to have brains. Robots can be programmed to seem like they have emotions but without a human brain, they wouldn't experience emotions like we do. I think that with our current technology, there won't be robots with emotions soon. Maybe in the far future, there will be a way to connect a human brain to a robot, but there are many other necessities to discuss. A brain cannot work by itself, there would have to be other organs to get the brain working. Where would we get the brains and organs? would they be donated for science, or artificially made in a lab? Many difficulties come with giving robots emotions, and I also don't think it is a necessity since we still have each other.
I agree because... student's emotions and consciousness can't be handled by AI, since it's a feeling that people experience with physical thoughts. I Think AI can show some information that can deal with some problems with students, but they can't attend to a student like how teachers do, since sometimes teachers comfort them by
their sweet talk, making them feel safe by the teacher's words or actions, which will make students feel a lot better, since the action is being done physically not through something AI generated.
I strongly don't agree with the first option because AI are machines invented by humans to help make work easier and faster, and not to stop human from doing some certain works. The excessive use of Artificial intelligence makes us lazy. When we say that we will stop going to school it doesn't sound well, because the knowledge used in the creation of Al was man made. If we don't go to school we will not learn.
Yes I agree that we can learn on social medias like Facebook and YouTube but we need to acquire some classroom skills such as the listening skills, the communication skills. We need to get a clear vision of what AI is all about. We all must work hard in other not to let Artificial intelligence replace our learning skills.
I agree with you when you say that the AI will not be able to help us acquire some particular classroom skills such as listening skills, and communication skills.
Another of the skill that the AI will never be able to have is the SOCIAL SKILLS. I say this because when you said that the AI will not be able to do everything for us it got me thinking... will the AI be able to do everything for us including our social skills, certainly not because there is a particular way that the AI act which is way different from humans especially in speaking. When I watched a movie titled THE MITCHELLS VS THE MACHINES which deals with both humans and AI, I noticed that the humans and the AI always had a voice difference and the AI cannot talk fluently because they are robots.
Another thing I will say is that AI lacks social skills because AI cannot relay practical experiences of humans to us like waiting.
To package all my thoughts, the AI will never be able to have social skills because the AI will always have a boundary in anyway, humans will always be ahead of the AI.
I completely agree with the words you have said.we should work hard and learn the skills.
Actually, for me I also strongly disagree with opinion A, why because AI was never created or rather made to take over but to enhance or also reduce work force. But for opinion B, I strongly agree with it because, an individual must have to learn how if he\she must to create .
To learn is know, to understand is to have a solid ground of the teaching or lesson so if not actually for school I don't think that it will be possible for individuals to understand how to produce, use and even create AI.
So I say yes, that in the future school will still actually exist because of the lack of understanding and emotional skills of AI.
This is an interesting point you made, that an individual should learn to be able to create. Do you think that there will be a shift in the content taught at school, so that students are taught how to use AI to their benefit?
Yes, actually there will be a shift in the content of teaching students at school. And also AI in schools is a great idea for students to learn to use AI, for the benefits of their education.
Not forget that AI was built to assist or rather enhance human capability to do or to learn, remember that human IQ which in others words human intelligence human use their intelligence to create more softwares to the addition of the benefits to the AI world of intelligence.
So in conclusion what I am trying to say is that AI are built to assist human beings or rather enhance our capabilities to do work, like in schools AI can help students to learn and to be better and broader In what they are being taught in schools, AI in schools yes will change the content and teaching for students to improve the productivity of learning in schools. Thanks.
Thank you for sharing your view - I also think that AI needs to be used to assist us in performing tasks. You said that AI will alter the content in schools - could you please give an example on how the content will then change?
I strongly agree with opinion c, although most times we tend to think school was created for us to just learn more information but it is not so. School helps us develop interactive skills and also social skills it helps develop our emotional intelligence and teaches us basic morals and values about life. School teaches us how to communicate with other people, how to show love and empathy and it also develops our critical thinking skills. These are basic things we learn in school that machines or AI can't teach us.
While we're diving into the above contexts all of those points are quite true ! but I agree with the Second opinion because when its all about the technology we should know how to use it properly. Since, the technology is very vast and broad and uses much more concepts than a basic schooling knowledge although AI can help us with technical education and knowledge but it fails when decision making and brain development topics arises. People created this world of technology and AI when they had their own brain working and had knowledge of it but when we people will depend upon AI for the simplest of simple thinks then how can we say that we wouldn't be dull one day. In future AI can help us with learning process but being totally dependent on AI doesn't meets all the condition.
Let's assume we are in the type of future where we are dependent totally upon the AI and we don't either go to the school, it creates a big layer of self-doubt between the communities and countries. It would be bizarre that people need support even to communicate with each other and add their own points for their own self-respect. If this is actually the future of the world should we hesitate to talk in this context ? Absolutely not write, why should we destroy the joyful life our next generation . So, I want to conclude my statement with the point that we should not leave the school because of AI, although it is useful we cannot accept the bizarre reality which is really going to question about the survival of humans with there supreme intelligence that's why I agree with the second opinion.
I agree with opinion C-"School is not just about learning information.It's important for things that machines can't help with.".Even if one of the main purposes of schools is to provide education,We also gain a lot of other qualities that are useful in our life like discipline, punctuality,manners,social skills etc.We are given chances to learn from our mistakes and are provided with proper guidance from our teachers.We learn to how control,express and figure out our emotions.Most importantly the memories we make with our friends and the support we get and give each other is something I believe we can't get through books...
So,I conclude by saying I strongly support opinion C....Thank You!
I completely agree with you. School teaches you other qualities that cannot be taught in any other way. You gain memories that's hard for a homeschooled child to compare to. it teaches you life skills; how to interreact and mange with people correctly. Without these skills countries cannot work together and develop more towards the future. Removing schools completely would be like removing a bottom piece block from a tower, It all comes falling down! So, in my opinion I agree with option C.
I strongly agree with opinion B. Education is a fundamental part of society, and it will continue to play a crucial role in the future. While the methods and tools used in education may evolve, the concept of schools and learning will persist. Schools provide a structured environment for students to acquire knowledge, develop skills, and foster social interactions. Even with advancements in technology, human teachers will still be essential in guiding and inspiring students. So, rest assured, schools will continue to exist and adapt to the changing needs of future generations! Even though AI technology can enhance the learning experience by providing personalized feedback, adaptive learning platforms and access to vast amounts of information, the school should exist in the future.
Great answer! Would you like AI to be more integrated into your school? How do you think that you personally would benefit from it?
Yes, Future is all about AI and I would like AI to be more integrated into my school as integrating AI into schools has the potential to revolutionize education in several ways. One of the key benefits is personalized learning. AI can analyze vast amounts of data about individual students, such as their learning styles, strengths, and weaknesses. With this information, AI systems can create customized learning experiences tailored to each student's needs. This means that I can learn at my own pace and focus on areas where I need more support. Additionally, AI can provide instant feedback on assignments and assessments which will help me for future improvement as AI algorithms can quickly evaluate student work and provide feedback on areas that need improvement. This immediate feedback allows me to identify mistakes and make corrections in real-time, enhancing my learning experience. It also could help me to provide access to wide range of educational materials, including interactive tutorials, videos, and practice exercises. And I can explore these resources at my own convenience, reinforcing my understanding of the subject matter.
Thank You!
I partially agree with opinion 2. In this world, there is no end of learning. Learning is crucial for personal and skill development and for the ability to adapt in an ever-changing world. It is a fact that machines can never be more intelligent than humans. Because it is humans who have created it. Machines might be intelligent, but they are in no comparison with the human brain and its power. So to cope with uncertainties and to advance the world, people must seek knowledge. People need to learn not only for themselves but for the whole of mankind. Also, to ensure the progress of modern technologies, people must continuously learn and discover new things. This is how, through discovering and learning new things every day, the world is advancing.
In my point of view opinion A is wrong.I strongly disagree with opinion A because AI is the software created by the people that helps us to solve our problems.If people use AI way to much than they will be more lazier,non-creative and they may loose their thinking capacity as well.
Knowing that AI is also a software created by human beings we cannot stop going to schools on the future because after we created the AI the coming generations must be able to use and operate it and know how to use it because if they won't go to school to learn about how to operate AI than there is no use of creating such softwares.AI is created to boost our learning capacity and we people know that AI won't go to the schools to learn for us so we must go to school to learn about it.AI may provide us some knowledge but it cannot provide us everything.There are also the things like communication sensational feelings and all.
For example:If the coming generations won't go to the school than how will they know how to have a good communication with people? They may not be able to have social and emotional skills and communicating capacity like the students of today's generations going to school.
That's a great argument. Humans have to acquire basic skills and adapt their knowledge base to ensure we adding value to AI and technology in the future. Do you think there are areas of learning or knowledge which might be obsolete for human beings to learn?
I feel a very strong agreement with opinion C, as education is not just Maths or English but is the development of one's mind both mentally and emotionally, and I don't think AI will be able to help with such a situation. Education is divided into two parts, I.Q(Intelligence Qutient) and E.Q(Emotional Quotient) , though many people think school is just the learning of subjects, I believe a major part of someones education is E.Q which is the interaction between teacher and student, and AI can never really establish any emotional connection with students. Another reason why AI would not be able to do the job of a teacher, is that all it does is to portray information programmed into it and that will not allow it to take the time to attend to students in the ways they need to be attended to. This is why I believe that AI could never take the job of a teacher.
Hi,
I agree with your answer to opinion C. In the near future, AI might be capable of taking jobs from humans because they are programmed to do so. However the human mind is a very versatile organ that is able to learn and grow. AI doesn't have a brain nor does it have the ability to learn. It is only programmed to do certain things. In school, there are things that change as the day goes by such as the way the teacher teaches and the way the students respond. AI will teach the same things over and over and will only answer to certain questions that have been programmed into them. Some kids may ask questions that may not have been a predicted answer. Therefore, the AI wont have much of a response and will dismiss the child. A real teacher will come up with a way to answer the question no matter the circumstance.
I absolutely agree with point B. The drive to learn, explore, and understand the world around us is an inherent human trait. Even if machine possess knowledge, the motivation and purpose for learning ultimately comes from our own curiosity, passion and desire to grow as an individual.
I agree because...
Leading a classroom is not just about content expertise in a subject matter but also teachers' empathy, insights, and inspiration. Machines cannot match that. AI tools can help provide personalized learning for a student but only when directed to do so by a skilled and empathetic teacher.
Learning is not just about gaining information it's about the experience we learn more from the experience of going to school than just relying on machines.
I totally agree with you. It is a necessity for humans to learn about the world around us. It lets us express our creativity and curiosity. Education is important not only for humans to learn it teaches people how to evolve and adapt to the world. Also, when it comes to social and emotional skills. AI wouldn't be able to help. This proves that people need to learn even if AI can be very resourceful. We humans have to learn about ourselves because there are multiple situations in which AI can't assist you.
I choose C because “School is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with.” For example, they say the world is a global village and so we need one another for life to be easy. Countries and individuals need to carry out businesses or trade with one another and to do this we need people. Machines can't help us make friends, they can't even teach us how to interact with one another. They tell us all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. Every child needs to be physically active to lead healthy lives. With robots, we will live a sedentary life, and become lazy and obese if care is not taken but having friends to play physically can help us be active and healthy.
I totally agree with you because the importance of school beyond just information is well reasoned and insightful. You rightly highlight the importance of school on developing different life skills such as communication, problem solving skills, which are crucial for human beings and cannot be easily replicated by machines. Schools provide us opportunities for teamwork, building friendships- experiences machines can't provide. Excessive use of technology will also make us lazy which will directly affect our physical health.
I strongly disagree with opinion A. One of the biggest disadvantage of AI is the fact that it is addictive and once something gets addictive, it becomes bad. Opinion A is a clear evidence of that. People will come to rely on AI too much and they will not see the need to do anything for themselves, even learn! As humans, we need to learn and grow, not sit back and let artificial intelligence do it for us. This is why as much as AI is helpful, it should be regulated. The introduction of AI to schools is really advantageous to the young generation, but it should not be allowed to dominate the entire teaching process. Learning isn't all about books and equations, it is also about experiencing situations that help us grow. If we let AI experience it for us then we are just going to limit our growth.
You make an interesting point about regulation, intelligent_orchard. How do you think the advantages of AI can be used in the classroom, without dominating the teaching process? Who should be responsible for regulating this?
Thank you for this interesting question. AI can be used to provide teaching aids such as videos, audios or pictures as well as make immersive learning possible so that the students can feel like they are really experiencing what they are being taught. AI can even help the teachers in compiling results and scores. Ai can help in a myriad of ways. AI is fast, accurate, precise and reliable. This means it will make the perfect teaching assistant. A very good way to bring AI into the picture without taking human teachers out is by making AI the assistants and teachers the bosses. Afterall AI has always been an aid from the start Teachers can be in charge of regulating how much AI they want to involve in their teaching. This way, it will be perfectly in tune with what the teacher thinks is best for their students. If a teacher decides to use AI minimally then fine. If a teacher decides to use AI completely then that's okay too. It depends on what the teacher thinks will help the students, even though too much AI won't be that beneficial.
I agree with options C because some aspects of education
Remain beyond the capabilities of AI. For instance AI will not elaborate on concepts in the same way teachers do, It often provides information based on programming .
Additionally AI lacks the ability to offer emotional support , a vital aspect of the human teacher-student dynamic.
I agree to your opinion, I also think the very same way. AI lacking the ability to offer emotion is great point that you brought up. Being a human it is easier for us to learn through a teacher who we can be emotionally attached with. With out emotion it is hard for any student to understand a topic better. The way a teacher teaches cannot just be mimicked or performed by an AI, And AI alone cant just replace school in any way.
What I think is that AI is not a tool to replace school but a extension to make school better.
[Thank you and your point is very relatable :) ]
I agree with C. School is a dynamic place where we can learn a lot of things. School teaches us important skills like time management, communication, problem-solving, leadership, teamwork, adaptability, creativity, professionalism and so on. These are skills that we cannot learn from AI or machines. Machines can teach us things like mathematics and other subjects but something it would not help us learn is applying or implement important skills in our everyday lives. In schools we not only learn information but we learn how to use that information to our advantage in our everyday lives.
For starters, AI lacks human interaction which a teacher will have with students in school. These Interactions can help with communication skills and self expression. A student without communication skills is almost equal to one which did not go to school because he or she will not have the ability to express himself or herself. While machines can provide support to students, they cannot replace the human interaction which is so important in education.
The objective of education is learning not teaching.
We also need to talk about one thing that is "How to create AIs?" Which can be used to increase the demand of schools because they can be taught in schools. This will include Python programming language. But, schools only provide basic knowledge which we can expand by having full courses. This will increase demand of schools rather decrease.
I fully disagree with opinion 'A' is not just only for school is important for a person's mental and physical development but also because we are getting fully dependent on AI day by day. One day will come, when we will be fully dependent on this machines and can't even imagine or think what we are doing. This will make us lazy, which not good for a nation's development.
So, i am not telling that we should not use this. I am just telling to not be addicted to it . We have to use it and learn the things that we do not know.
But the things we know should be done by us.
Thank you.
I agree with option A because I believe that artificial intelligence has the potential to replace traditional schools. instead of physically attending classes, individuals could stay at home and engage in online learning. This shift could alleviate stress for teachers who could conduct classes remotely.
I understand your point of switching from traditional schools to more AI based learning. However, I argue that weighing the pros and cons of that stance, traditional schools are very much still needed. I say this because a survey was done and shown on the website statista that 51% of Americans 23 and older experienced more stress working remotely. Although remote working and AIs carrying the hard work seems more easy on paper, there are a lot of other risks to consider.
Another risk to consider is how children will not likely benefit from a switch to AI based schools. Remote learning is very much a thing, as many home schooling programs feature remote learning. Although, there are not many or much of any AI remote schools. Learning from an AI for young children and even teenagers can be a disconnect for a lot of people, myself included. It is not the same as the physical experience of having a tangible teacher there to answer your questions, and work through problems with a face to talk to.
Another factor to consider is the loss of jobs. This issue is raised by many on news outlets, and some close to home. AI are meant to be… intelligent, but they were not designed to replace humans. This would be especially hard in a teaching environment, where good teachers need to constantly adapt to individual child’s learning challenges and preferences; because, realistically everyone doesn’t learn the same way.
I agree with you loyal_snow, however Artificial Intelligence doesn't have the ability to interact and show emotions to the students,some students can be cunning and need special attention,how do you expect AI to control or help them?,in as much as Artificial Intelligence helps make life easier and can help traditional schools to release stress from teachers ,it's not everytime that AI gives accurate answers or response and it can malfunction at anytime leading to high cost of repairing it .
You raise valid points about the limitations of AI in emotional interaction and handling unique student needs. While AI can streamline tasks and assist teachers, it's essential to supplement it with human support for nuanced situations and to mitigate the risk of malfunctions. Additionally, integrating emotional intelligence training for students alongside AI can help address some of these challenges.
I agree with opinion C because absolutely, school plays a crucial role in fostering skills beyond mere information acquisition. It provides opportunities for social interaction, critical thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence—areas where human abilities shine. These aspects are essential for personal development, effective communication, and adapting to the complex nuances of life, which machines cannot replicate.
I agree with the idea that people will always need to learn on their own, even if machines are smart. While AI can help and make learning better, humans have special things like curiosity, creativity, and the skill to really understand complicated stuff. Learning is like a complete experience that includes exploring things for yourself, thinking carefully, and feeling connected emotionally things that machines can't do exactly like us. Also, the different experiences and views that people bring make learning more interesting. AI is helpful, but it doesn't take away the natural human wish to know and understand things.
I chose B because in my opinion, people have a way of teaching and making people understand easier than machines, this is because humans have a way of understanding emotions, unlike a robot for instance that has been programmed to perform or carryout a particular task, it just goes straight to the point not minding if the recipient is being carried along. I also think that it depends on the lesson for example: if it has to do with topics like art we all know that art has to do with expression so if a machine is to teach people the topic relating to art, then the students/pupils might not have adequate understanding of what art really means. So I think yes schools will exist and I will love to hear your opinions about it.
I strongly disagree that "There’s no point in going to school when machines can do the learning for us!" because the inception of AI is from knowledge acquired and the advancement of AI is also from knowledge acquired. Therefore I believe that without going to school the advancement of technology and AI will not be able to take place.
I strongly agree to this jazzed tarmarillo ,Opinion A says "there is no point in going to school when machine can do the learning "
Yes, machine are programmed to carry out difficult tasks,that are beyond our capacity, which is more quick,easy and efficient.there are so many reasons why we have to be in our classroom to learn.
*Financially: student that can't even afford to pay their fee or buy textbooks,I don't think such student will be able to afford an Ai machine.
*It will deprive interaction between student and teachers, even the teacher's will lack interest in their job which could lead to unemployment.
Machines don't have the capacity to generate knowledge or transfer learning.
And don't forget that"learning is a means of acquiring knowledge and skills,continuous learning help innovate new ideas" I don't think they will be new ideas if machines do the learning. A machine can never generate and idea on it own ,only if it's programmed to do so.
We humans needs to learn because, human mind is always curious and never hesitate to discover new innovative ideas.
Rightly said admirable_butterfly, there's learning in teaching. My experience with teachers has shown me that the greatest joy in teaching is when the student surpasses the teacher, that is to show how efficient the teacher is. As an AI, teaching is static, it only gives results according the amount of sources it gets its information which therefore limits the students from other sources where more useful information may come from. But as a teacher, research is their primary goal because they want to provide the student with their best so they go the extra mile to even ask their acquaintances in other different fields of occupation just so that they can provide the students with up-to-date information on topics, they go through a lot of stress just to see that their students get the best and are happy. Thinking about it now, teachers have alot of children, not just from home but also in school, they are literally the second parent a child can have, without them there's no school experience. This is just but one out of many advantages teachers have over AI, I believe there's no way an AI could do what a typical teacher does.
Yeah! I completely agree with the option B because I think that humans are the only thing that has true emotional intelligence. Also this aspect of human cognition is currently challenging for machines to replicate accurately. Emotional intelligence is crucial in areas such as communication, leadership, and interpersonal relationships. Because of this humans enable themselves to understand, interpret and make the ethically right decision. I also think that machine are programmed but human learning process is dynamic and naturally curios than programmed AI and robots. While machines can be programmed and trained for specific tasks, they do not possess an inherent drive for continuous self-improvement and learning beyond their initial programming. Humans also bring perspective in their own unique way rather than programmed code. Machines also lack personal experience and struggle.
In summary, while machines and artificial intelligence can enhance efficiency and perform specific tasks, the distinct qualities of human cognition, such as creativity, adaptability, emotional intelligence, ethical reasoning, and continuous learning, are likely to ensure that human learning remains a crucial and irreplaceable aspect of our existence.
That's all from my side
Thank You!
Interesting answer, do you think though eventually we will be able to effectively recreate the human brain therefore giving it those qualities that you describe as human specific? I don't know the answer but its certainly an interesting and slightly worrying thought!
Even though I think that all the emotions can be recreated. I still think that robots and humans can be easily distinguished. Like Masahiro Mori states it "The Uncanny Valley". For some reference, the uncanny valley isn't a place found on a map, but a term that describes the sense of discomfort or unease we experience when we encounter a robot with certain human-like characteristics. At the end all I'd like to say is the qualities can be recreated but the form and structure can't be.
Absolutely yes! I choose to go with option B because there is always a need to learn. People are always driven by a burning desire to acquire knowledge. I know machines can be intelligent if programmed to do so, but the real question is, who programs these machines? I know you will say ‘humans’. So there is a need for more upgrades in human knowledge to be able to give the machines high-tech inputs to meet the fast pace of inquiry.
Even though this AI will do human jobs faster, and will make people rely solely on it there is a great need for these machines to be up to date and humans need to advance their knowledge and do more research to make the use of these machines enjoyable and hitch-free.
There is a great need for people to keep advancing and acquiring their knowledge and it can be done through schooling. What should be the main focus is, the school setting and arrangement. It should be important to know that some formal settings of education might become obsolete because most schools and institutions might want to go digital so instead of sitting in a formal classroom and facing the board most schools might incorporate the distance learning method which involves the use of computer devices and having virtual learning methods.
Schools cannot be eradicated in entirety because AI rather than the two can just find a way to be fused. In my opinion, if you are ready to learn, then take advantage of the opportunity provided and follow the trend.
I strongly agree with C because “School is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with.” For example in school you learn some important virtues such as: Honesty,Tolerance,Patience e.t.c.
Machines would not be able to teach you these virtues. In school you also learn how deal with people because is you would meet a lot of people with different personalities.
I disagree with statement A because schools not only provide information to the students but also help in improving their manners, improve their communication skills, school is a medium where children with different mentality come together and co ordinate. So no matter how much we develop in terms of AI and technology, we should not forget our roots . And children in future should be sent to school in my opinion
I disagree with A point. It is not about skipping school, it is about interacting with our peers, this is also a lesson that students need to learn. Human interaction, conveying feelings to each other is something that machines can't do.
As we know, learning should be experiental and this is the best way to learn life.
I strongly disagree with A, because going to school and getting an education is strictly necessary. We all want what is best for our planet, our country, our family and so on. In order to achieve that, we need to respect some rules, but also independently think for ourselves.
All throughout history we have fought for rights, but mostly the one to go to school
Now that we have finally achieved it, I'd say let's not give it up. With its ups and downs, school is school and it exists for a reason.
Personally, I would not like to live in a world full of people relying on technology for absolutely everything. It was created to ease our lives but I fear we already started abusing it. For example, a big amount of children use AI to do their homework. After doing that, they are left with no useful information. They've learnt nothing. Another example which I see quite often is calling someone who is in another room, just for them to bring you something you didn't want to take yourself.
By that, I don't say that we should exclude it permanently. It has turned out incredibly useful. Researching something has become so easy. You can learn and develop skills on different topics, based on your preferences. If you wish to study something more profoundly, then the internet is there to help you.
I believe that:
Traditional school= not enough resources
AI as a teacher= lacks the capability of bonding with the students
AI+human teacher= just the right balance
I absolutely agree with you on the value of education and the role of technology. Going to school is more than just learning; it is also about developing independent thinking skills, respecting laws, and forming well-rounded persons. While technology, especially artificial intelligence (AI), can be a useful tool for learning, it should supplement rather than replace conventional education. Your remark regarding the potential exploitation of technology in performing assignments without learning valuable knowledge rings true. Striking the correct balance between traditional education and technology is critical for providing a well-rounded education that includes resources, personal connections with teachers, and the benefits of technological innovations. The combination of these aspects contributes to a more complete learning experience and better prepares us for future problems.
Well done for replying to another Topical Talker.
It is always a pleasure.
I fail to agree on option A because even if AI is going to take over some works from humans it does not mean that humans should not go to school again, remember AI are meant to be operated by we humans, now if we do not go to school, how are we going to acquire the knowledge on how they are to be controlled. Let me just remind you that some of this AI are been created in a way that they can make decisions on their own. If we humans fail to go to school that means AI will definitely come together one day and plan on how to take over humans because no one will be educated so we can't control them anymore, that will now make humans to be under AI instead of AI been under human. So I think if we still want to be in control of the AI we must consider going to school and even been more attentive than ever because this AI really deserve our ability for us to control them.
I strongly agree with option C, the reason being that school as a strong agent of socialization offers more than education to the students. Schools actually offer support to students in diverse areas, ranging from emotional support to educational support and in my society even mental and spiritual support, these are things even an AI can't achieve because they don't have emotions to even understand the challenges the students are facing. I'm a living testimony of school offering emotional support, I can mention a handful of teachers who I take as family, this is because no matter the struggles I'm passing through, they always find a way to reduce the work load I carry, sometimes I even tell them things I can't tell my parents talk less of an AI. In my school we even have a little mosque where muslim students go to pray in case they can't get home at a stipulated time, with an AI who doesn't have any beliefs talkless of building a good spiritual relationship with God but with a muslim teacher present in school, he can relate with challenges the students are facing and use his experience as a tool in helping the students deal with their struggles therefore forming a second family who can help in the betterment of the students.
Again, I say that school would still be needed even with the climax of AIs and robots, that's one thing we can't displace
I totally agree with this because school also helps parents in bringing discipline, values and respect into a child which an AI can't achieve because their job will just to be a teacher to teach not like humans who use this opportunity to instill values to students thanks
I agree with industrious_shark because: Students going to school help them to learn and know more about their customs and values. And they can also learn how to be kind and remorseful and disciplined towards other, but AI just do as they are programmed they don't have feelings unlike we humans who use that to impact others in a positive way but AI can only teach a person on what they ask it.
So finally I say that students good ng to school is very useful for themselves and also for the community.
I strongly agree with admirable_butterfly because...
Students going to school doesn't only help them to know more about the subjects they are being taught but also helps them to become a better person in life. And truly students going also instill string moral values in them which will be useful in their lives as they progress. But AI(Artificial Intelligence) teaches people on what they programed to teach or what they have processed from other websites. So truly students going to school will affect them positively and also take them to higher places in life.
Thank you
I respectfully agree with active_beetle on this matter because AI(artificial intelligence)can only perform task that they are programmed to do but teacher are humans so they can't be programmed but they instill their knowledge into into we students. Also students going to school also help them to know more about their traditions and culture and also acquire knowledge and skills in various subject. It also provides opportunities for social interaction and learning how to work in teams. Schools also inspire students and helps them discover their passions. So, going to school is a valuable decision that will help one to progress in life.
Thank you
I agree with your motion....
Students not going to school is a total no no for me and I think for a whole lot of people.
Going to school does not just mean that you want to learn Maths, English, Chemistry, Biology and others and pass them in the exams. No!
Or for example you learn them because you want to have a degree or pass external exams. No! For instance here in Nigeria our external exams include JAMB(Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board),WAEC(West Africa Examinations Council, UTME (Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examinations) and many more.
Our parents sent to us school for so many reasons aside from learning:We go to school to:
-To socialize
- To learn discipline or other moral values
- Parents send their kids to school so that we children can be better than them in the future.
- To have direction to the future
- To understand life generally
- To gain motivation
And many more!
We all learn this at school, so we can't stop school just because AI is overtaking.
Rightly said spirited_concept.
Students going to school doesn't only make them vast in knowledge but also helps them to have a good moral standard and values for others, students going to school also provides a chance for social interaction. But as for AI they can only respond to students on what they are being asked, or what they have been programmed to do also AI can't teach students based on emotional topics and they can't console students when feeling down but teacher can because they have emotions, they have the ability to feel and teach we students from their emotions which will prove useful in our lives as we grow.
Thank you.
I agree because AI isn't human and its only meant to do its program it doesn't have feelings so it cant do things only a human would do which is support children emotionally as well and not just teach them.
I absolutely agree with you. The only use for AI in this case is educational support. It's programmed for just education since it has no emotions for mental and spiritual support. When it goes out of this category (in my opinion) it's useless.
I disagree with opinion a as we still need to learn for ourselves instead of depending on AI all the time and without us who will program and take of AI , and I agree with opinion C because even though we can talk with AI it is not the same as talking with friends from school because thy understand you and what you are going through unlike AI and they also feel emotion which means they will empathize with you during your hardships and will be happy for you during the good times, School will also help us with our people skills meaning that school is still very important.
I agree with opinion C because, schools do more than providing knowledge, they also play a significant role in modeling character, fostering moral development, and instilling ethical values in students.
While AI development is not directly dependent on character education and moral development in schools.
I agree with both opinion B and C. There are things AI can't help us with, and we have to learn for ourselves. How do you think babies learn to walk? They watch the people around them and eventually try it themselves. They don't ask Chat GPT, an AI, to write a tutorial on how to walk. Sure, a tutorial made by AI on how to walk can be helpful to those who can read but cannot walk, but it's humans who are lifting up the person and making sure they don't fall. In the end, It's humans who are making AI, and to do that they had to go to school for many years and learn as much as they could about coding and building machines. Us humans will forever need school if we want to continue making new AI and utilizing them. If we don't even know how to add, how will we know how to use AI?
I strongly disagree with point A which is the idea that there’s no point in going to school when machines can do the learning for us. First of all, machines cannot replace human creativity, curiosity, and critical thinking, which are essential skills for learning and innovation. Second, going to school is not only about acquiring knowledge, but also about developing social and emotional skills, such as communication, collaboration, and empathy, which machines cannot teach us. Third, learning from machines can make us dependent on them and lose our ability to think for ourselves, which can have negative consequences for our personal and professional lives. Therefore, I believe that going to school is still very important and valuable, even in the age of machines.
I agree to opinion B
Although, machines and AI can be intelligent and process information quickly, human still need to continue learning for their own development to critically assess and interpret the outcome produced by AI system.
That's a really nice point loyal snow.
Although AI gives ease to our work and learning, there are still many aspects of learning and development students still need to acquire and learn by observing, researching etc.
An instance of character; in my school, we have been brought up in a manner that CHARACTER IS EVERYTHING. A school teaches a child how to behave when found in the midst or gathering of others, both in the presence of peers and elders which to be sincere, an AI won't be able to do effectively.
School is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with. I agree with this statement because school also teaches us skills and values that are essential for our personal and social development. For example, school helps us to develop creativity, critical thinking, communication, collaboration, empathy, responsibility, and citizenship. These are things that machines can’t help with, or can’t replace human abilities. School prepares us to face the challenges and opportunities of the future, not only as learners, but also as human beings.
I strongly agree with opinions C as well as B. I agree with these opinions because some things that you might learn in school may be important for the future or your well being. Also, in opinion B it states that humans should also learn things for themselves. I agree with this because even though some things are powered or ran by Artificial Intelligence we should still know how to do things for and by ourselves. If we rely on A.I for everything we won't be independent. I would like to add that I know you can use A.I in some accounts but don't use it as your main resource of learning. I'm saying this because some things that humans do are better than A.I considering that A.I doesn't have a brain nor feelings. Some jobs and skills can be better done by a human than a computer system. This is why I strongly disagree with opinion A because like I mentioned some things are better done by a humans. This means that there could be a mistake at any moment. I'm not saying humans can't make mistakes just as much as A.I but I'm saying that some jobs would be better done by a human with real emotions, feelings, and opinions. If we don't express this in school, kids might grow up to think that a robot can do everything for them.
I strongly agree with the opinions b and c. I strongly agree with these opinions , due to me believing people should take the time to actually learn something for themselves instead of actually just relying on AI to help them do everything. Although AI can help out, I believe individuals should not only lean on AI to help, but to actually use what they know. Also, as opinion c stated, "School is not just about learning information.It's important for things that machines can't help with." AI can not help with everything, its best to use your schema. For example, lets just say that you have a test to do. With a test, you can only rely on your background knowledge and what you have learnt. To add on, think about another scenario. You are in class, with your friends, family, or out with others. You all begin to discuss a topic that later turns into a debate. You would have to use your intellect instead of Google. You would have to use your intellect due to it being YOUR opinion. Even though you could use AI to back up your opinion, you should still use your reasoning and evidence. As well, I strongly disagree with the opinion a. In my opinion, there is a reasonable point for going to school. Even though you could get facts from AI, I feel that it is best to go to school so that people does not lose their communication skills. In addition too, there are some things that you should learn how to do yourself in person instead of learning how to do everything off a computer screen.
Hey!
I agree with your points so much. If humans can't use our knowledge and intellect, doesn't that make us useless? Most machines are programmed to eliminate things that don't work or serve a function, what will happen to us if that becomes the case? How would we earn money, travel, and find discoveries if we do nothing? Let's never forget how important school is not only to ourselves, but the economy as a whole. If we stopped school anytime humans found a great discovery in the past, where do you think we would be today?
I strongly agree with opinion C.
Yes, I won't deny the fact that School is mainly for learning information,however there are also some important life skills to be learnt in schools that a machine would never be able to teach somebody effectively.
It is also proven that learning in schools physically and face to face will help in raising children more than students learning from mere machines.In other words a machine cannot fully replace teachers or perform the work of a teacher.
This is due to different reasons such as:
1. Teachers are better than computers because of their human nature.
2. They can lend an ear to the student in doubt and can lend a hand to the student in need.
3. A teacher is more than just a facilitator of knowledge; a teacher also acts as a guide, a mentor and an inspiration for students, a role that cannot be replaced by machines of any kind and so on.
I without a doubt agree strongly with option C, As we all know, AI is more like an enhancement factor when it comes to learning, it brings in more alternatives than one and makes learning versatile. But we cannot count teachers, teachers are the pinnacle of learning, they can aid us more than AIs at any point in time. Teachers are more detailed, and can be asked questions regularly therefore explaining deeper unlike AI which only scratches the surface. Teacher can also identify student's strength and weakness unlike AIs therefore encouraging students to work on their weaknesses and get better. Teachers are more authentic than any form of AIs. AIs can only explain or enumerate what they are programmed to do and are limited, while teachers are not programmed, they have years of study and can emphasize greatly without limitations on what they specialized in
I agree with option B. Many of the people use AI to make their work easier but they need to learn to build their creativity . AI machine are intelligence but we should not depend very much in AI . We may lose our confidence if we will always use AI. We will stop thinking creative ideas about anything if we will always copy answers from AI. SO, I feel that people shoud start lear for themselve.
Hi !
For the fact that Artificial intelligence is taking over human intelligence, it will be to your own benefit if you attend school in order to also gather knowledge to create other AI platforms or machines. Looking at the world turning around and still sit down waiting for survival to fall from the sky and make you comfortable is to your own detriment. "No cross no crown", when you think there is no need to going to school, you will not acquire knowledge that are necessary to make yourself to be known. Therefore I disagree with point A.
I strongly disagree with point A as if we do not go to school we will not learn the basic knowledge to live and thrive properly. School also prepares us for the future and provides us with valuable knowledge to get a job to support ourselves.
I partially agree with point B as, if one day Ai goes rogue or gets band we at least need the basic knowledge school provides us with. If we completely rely on AI when or if it goes rogue or gets banned we would not know how to do anything.
I strongly agree with point C. For example, we learn things about emotions and Ai & robots are emotionless and don't understand how emotions effect people and how they function. Another example is dancers. Dances need to be able to posses a certain quality of movement which robots or Ai would not be able to do.
I CHOSE OPINION B, BECAUSE IT BESTS SUITS THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER, I WILL FURTHER ELABORATE BELOW;
Emotional and Social Intelligence:
Human learning is intricately tied to emotions and social interactions. Humans possess a nuanced(variable) understanding of emotions, empathy, and the ability to navigate complex social situations. When learning, individuals often draw on their emotional experiences, forming connections between knowledge and personal context. This emotional and social intelligence is crucial for effective communication, collaboration, and the development of interpersonal skills—qualities that machines may struggle to replicate authentically, because they don't have feelings or emotions to which aid crucially.
Example: In a classroom setting, a teacher's ability to empathize with students, understand their emotional needs, and create a supportive learning environment enhances the overall educational experience. Machines, lacking genuine emotions, might find it challenging to connect with learners on a personal and emotional level.
Creativity and Innovation:
Human learning is fuelled by creativity and innovation, allowing individuals to think beyond established boundaries and generate novel ideas. While machines can process information based on predefined algorithms, they often lack the ability to create entirely new concepts, imagine alternative scenarios, or produce innovative solutions to complex problems. Human creativity is driven by intuition, imagination, and the ability to make unique connections between seemingly unrelated concepts.
Example: In the field of product(commodity) design, a human designer's ability to conceive innovative and aesthetically pleasing products often involves intuition and a deep understanding of human preferences. Machines might assist in data analysis, but the spark of creativity that drives groundbreaking designs is a distinctly human trait.
Contextual Understanding:
Humans excel at understanding and adapting to the complexities of real-world contexts. Learning involves more than memorizing information; it requires an awareness of the nuances present in different situations. Humans can consider multiple factors, adapt to changing circumstances, and apply knowledge in a flexible manner. This contextual understanding is vital in fields where real-world applications require a nuanced approach.
Example: In medical diagnosis, a doctor's ability to consider a patient's unique medical history, lifestyle, and environmental factors alongside clinical data demonstrates the depth of human contextual understanding. While machines can process vast amounts of medical information, the nuanced decision-making involved in personalized patient care is a distinct human capability.
In summary, while intelligent machines can provide valuable support in various aspects of learning and problem-solving, the distinct qualities of emotional and social intelligence, creativity, and contextual understanding underscore the irreplaceable nature of human learning experiences. These aspects contribute to the richness and depth of human knowledge and interactions, forming an essential part of the educational and developmental process.
I strongly oppose opinion A, AI can replace traditional methods of learning and education. While AI can learn and perform certain tasks better than humans, it has limitations in adapting to new situations and cannot replicate human learning, which involves critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. Education is not just about acquiring information but also about developing social skills, emotional intelligence, and a sense of identity. Machines cannot provide the same level of social interaction and emotional support that humans can. Education is also essential for personal growth and development, as it helps individuals understand their place in society and develop a sense of responsibility towards others. conclusively, AI can enhance education by providing personalized learning experiences and making certain aspects of education more efficient, but it cannot replace the importance of human learning and education.
Truth the told, we aren't the same people we were two seconds before. As a person, we learn and grow daily. Even if machines are too intelligent, humans would always find something to learn. Why? Humans have a thirst for knowledge. Although, cats are supposedly curious but humans are very inquisitive. Humans can never be too submissive because we will always have a reason or a purpose to dominate over something or someone. Learning is part of our growth, exploration and is the reason for the existence of machines. If Alan Turing had not created AI, we would have never known about it or even have had the idea of it taking over and empowering us.
In my opinion, there is never a reason why a person should not learn and grow, despite adversaries that is why I disagree with opinion B because people will always need to learn for themselves.
I resonate strongly with Opinion C: “School is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with.”
Even though artificial intelligence (AI) is developing quickly and is capable of completing some tasks remarkably well, education is more than just imparting knowledge. No matter how clever machines are, they may not be able to fully replace human abilities like creativity, critical thinking, social skills, and emotional intelligence, which are all fostered in schools.
Learning is a comprehensive process that extends beyond memorizing facts. It implies the growth of moral principles, character, and the capacity to negotiate the complexities of interactions with others. Students can learn to collaborate, communicate effectively, and adjust to constantly changing circumstances in the supportive environment that schools provide.
Furthermore, nothing can replace the human element in education. Teachers act as role models, advisors, and motivators. They support during difficult times, give encouragement, and foster a love of learning. While AI can undoubtedly help with learning, a teacher-student relationship that is based on empathy is a special quality that greatly promotes personal development.
I strongly disagree with opinion A because education is undoubtedly the primary basic need for humanity in this era and the near future. It is evident that the fabrication of these machines has been in existence due to education - be it formal or informal. As a result, it has been proven that education cannot be done away with by falling on AI tools or machines for work output. Above all, education helps broaden our horizon as humans and inculcate the ability to think critically in order to appreciate other perspectives.
I do not agree with opinion [A] ,the reason why i do not agree is because we go to school not only to learn subjects but you will also learn new skills, including social skills and morals . The skills and knowledge that you learn at school will help you now and in later life as you start work. Good attendance shows potential employers that you are reliable. even some people while in school when they go for a week break they tend to forget some of the things they have been though , imaging now leaving school to the hands of the AI . We have a part of our brain that is divided into three we have the social skills, collaborative skill, and economic skill . The only way to build this skills is by going to school.
I agree with opinion B, this is because even though AI makes life easier for us, there are lots of things human beings can do that AI can't, such as conveying emotions, critical thinking, creativity, etc.
Thus I thinks that we as humans will need to learn a thing or two even though machines are intelligent. You many never know where you might need theses skills you've learnt
I strongly agree with Opinion B because as much as there is and always will be an advancement and development in the area of Artificial Intelligence and automated processes, we the human race need an excellent volume of intelligence. We need this intelligence to be able to provide good occupations for us in the future whereby AI and automated machines are doing everything; we need the intelligence to be able to fend for ourselves and our families.
Hi. I solemly agree with point A because Ai will take over the teachers ,because they will be no need to go to school if you can sit in the comfort of your home and learn from your AI personal tutor or you can test drill yourself to know how far you have gone with Ai test drillers, E-examinations, and CBT exams.
I strongly agree with opinion B since it tells us learning even though machines created by us are intelligent too. Even if Robots can learn for us, we humans are what created them. We are the ones that programmed them so we will be able to control them, and we should not let it learn for as or do any of our schoolwork, because it shows a sign laziness.
Going to school is important because it is more than just learning facts; it is also about developing critical thinking, creativity, and social skills. Machines can offer information, but they cannot impart ideals, promote teamwork, or cultivate individuality. School teaches us how to adapt, solve issues, and interact with others, transforming us into well-rounded persons. The human experience in education extends beyond what robots can imitate, providing a comprehensive approach to personal development and comprehending the world.
I disagree a don't forget that AI was created and designed by humans and without the knowledge, AI would not exist, while using the learning app we would not fully understand so we also need to go through the teachers to teach us and make us understand because AI only act accordIng to their coding AI can only help in getting informations about a particular thing. Without education they would not be able to apply AI in their daily life. In conclusion AI will not and can not take over education.
I strongly disagree with opinion A ,which says" There is no point in going to school when machines can do the learning for us"
Absolutely not! AI are programmed by humans to execute difficult tasks that are beyond our ability ,not to take over the work of teachers or schools at large.
If there are no schools,what will become of the next generation ,if they are not computer literate who will operate the machines?
We should never underestimate the value of classroom conversation and social interaction because teachers explain things through examples and instances based on the environment ,which AI cannot.
Going to school and talking to teacher face to face is instantly effective,but online you will have to put a hell of effort. In schools,practical oriented subjects are introduced,which AI obviously can't
With AI there is almost no hope of practising,no intellectual communication skills,face to face interaction e.t.c.
Am not saying that we cant learn at the comfort of the coach of our homes,it is important that we take note of people like slow learners who needs to be taught more calmly for them to pick,which teachers does and also imply some techniques and generate ideas for them but the case of AI ,it doesn't know who is a slow learner or fast learner.
There is no point in learning ,if you can't practicalised.
There is no point in learning if you can't get a certificate.
There will always be the need for humans to acquire knowledge even if machines are intelligence. It's importance to note that the level of intelligence exhibited by any machine is direct reflection of human intelligence.
Man's drive to improve machine intelligence will develop a new learning curve in school and these new information will in turn for the new curriculum to be studied in the formal school.
Is this your opinion? If so, can you explain why you think this? Is there any evidence to support your point of view?
Opinion A is strongly disagreeable . Not only has there been a huge wiping of history, such as the event when teaching standards told kids that Slavery was beneficial. With all the corruption in the government who knows what our kids will be taught. Also it's not just teaching that is a huge issue, but kids not engaging is worse. If school stopped kids would become distant from many others, also would become more dependent on their devices. This could cause kids to become the one thing their parents despise. As "(Reasoning Knowledge) stated", this would cause more people to become lazier. Humans would become less active, and with the amount of jobs being overtaken by robots. Eventually our society will become useless.
I disagree with opinion A because we still have to go to school because even if AI is powerful and can do the learning for us its still expensive in the first place and anybody at all could attack. Schools are even implementing a subject called STEM(Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) This would be essential because we could create our own AI and sell it for money and the way humanity is moving schools will eventually change and adapt to AI and start to be teaching it in school. Another point for us still going to school while AI is around as I had stated before is that it could be attacked by anybody at all, if we study in school and well as I said schools will eventually change to adapt to AI and technology we will learn about cybersecurity and we could develop our own cybersecurity another thing is AI isn't exactly meant to do the work for you rather its supposed to help you do the work as a teacher should. A teacher doesn't give you a job and they don't give you knowledge as well but instead they rather assist you in achieving your goals as AI should it wont learn for you but rather help you learn.
I agree with opinion C that going to school will still be necessary in the future because,in that time, schools might use more personalized learning strategies that leverage technology and data analytics to support students in learning at their own pace and in a way that best suits their individual skills and interests.
I agree because... Going to school may help humans have better understanding about AI which may help them to make and create better and more useful AI'S for example people like Bills Gate and Paul Allen would not have made Microsoft and so many others have made innovations as a result of education
Thanks
I agree because... School was created to have knowledge and understanding, it was created for students to become better and awesome people in future.
If the people who created AI such as Alan Turing, Arthur Samuel, John Mccarthy, etc didn't go to school, AI might not be invented during that time(1950). These legends were brilliant but needed school to back it up.
So saying humans should stop school is bad!. How will they learn to use AI? How will they learn how to repair AI if damaged? How will they learn to improve or invent their own AI?
I agree with opinion B because you as an individual also need to have the knowledge for yourself for different reasons e.g for having knowledge on past events.A person created AI and we have to be knowledgeable on how to create better tools for the future
I strongly disagree with the option A because we are humans we have emotions, feelings, and many other characteristics that the AI don't have. We go to school in order to read, write, and for many other purposes that helps us to guide our lives. For example, we went to school learn about AI and made an AI and upgrade it as it would fit for humans. But if we didn't go to school how we would have made an AI then research about it and make more comfortable." What would be our life if AI weren't created nor schools were meant for reading and writing?"
We went to school then research about AI then figured how to make them then Ai was created. And this process took years to complete. AI are the creations of humans, thinking that they could help other peoples but not by doing all work of a human.
These are my personal thoughts,
THANK YOU!
I strongly disagree with option A "There’s no point in going to school when machines can do the learning for us!" because that would stop us from progressing forward but help AI move forward. Ever since the history of human started, we have been progressing forward. If we stop learning that will stop our progress, that will put us in danger. You may think why ? AI has their own intelligence . They most probably will have artificial emotion developed. If we treat them badly, we might have to suffer extinction. Because they will have control all nuclear bombs and atomic bombs and use them at their will . Also people like Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking, some of the smartest people in the history of earth think AI is a threat to human.
So,we should not let them do the learning for us.
Thank You!
I agree with option B – “People will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too.” I agree with this option because machines are assistance, that’s what the sewing machine was invented for and the print maker. All of this is to assist. How will we know how to calculate the angles to make these machines? Or how will we be able to be… creative? Creativity is the basis of all things man made, and getting stuck in this modernism of robots who are coldly calculating and unfeeling can be hard to promote one of the fundamentals of our society. We as the people need to learn how to do things ourselves if we will ever think about a lively future, and one where we can be united. Machines are intelligent, yes, but they cannot make the moral decisions of a human. There is an example of this disaster with the platform commonly known as Twitter (now known as ‘X’). Twitter released a bot named Tay, and she quickly downgraded morally as people fed her unkind languages from amongst us, and she was taken down shortly. The point is, we humans still need to train ourselves accordingly, and be creative, as robots are just a assistance alongside us.
I love that you have used examples such as the sewing machine, do you think machines are always made to exist? Some Amazon Fulfilment centres for example and Tesla factories are mostly independent of human workers and work solely by machines. In addition you mention creativity which is a great point, do you think AI will lead to a resurgence in subjects such as Drama and Music?
Hi, I do not think machines are always made to exist as assistants, if that’s what you were saying. The sewing machine like I mentioned is an example because you need to be intelligent not just mathematically, but be a creative person to use that tool to turn your ideas into a reality. Machines cannot be creative for us, they can only imitate what’s already been done by man. You mention about the Amazon Fulfillment centres and Tesla Factories, to me it is dystopian to rid humans out of the process. Although the future is headed towards more machine-based jobs, humans will still need to be intelligent and creative to come up with how to design, draft, do the math, and build machines to deal with certain tasks. As for music, there are already AIs involved, but for now more commonly as vocalizers. A popular example of AI synthesizers are the Japanese Vocaloids. But to me, these are also tools to assist with creativity. People have used these synthesizers to make popular and outstanding music. With drama and movies, I don’t think AI will replace the human intelligence of a well crafted script. AI cannot create over 1,700 words like Shakespeare, or create a well written plot that can make you analyze every detail to understand a complex ending. Intelligence amongst humans is still key.
I am also agree with you . The statement "People will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too" reflects the idea that human learning and experience are unique and irreplaceable, even in a world where machines possess high levels of intelligence.
Individuality and Subjectivity:
Humans have individual perspectives, emotions, and subjective experiences that shape their understanding of the world. Machines, no matter how intelligent, lack the ability to fully replicate these subjective aspects of human cognition.
Complexity of Human Learning:
Human learning is often a complex and multifaceted process that involves not just the acquisition of information but also the development of critical thinking, creativity, emotional intelligence, and other cognitive skills. While machines can assist in providing information and automating certain tasks, they may not fully replicate the depth and complexity of human learning experiences.
Adaptability and Creativity:
Humans are capable of adapting to new situations, solving novel problems, and being creative in ways that machines currently struggle to match. While machines excel in certain predefined tasks and structured environments, human learning is often characterized by adaptability and creativity, enabling individuals to navigate a wide range of scenarios.
Intrinsic Motivation:
Human learning is often driven by intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and a desire for personal growth. Machines lack these intrinsic motivations and operate based on programmed algorithms. The drive for self-improvement and the pursuit of knowledge are intrinsic aspects of human nature that may not be fully replaced by machine intelligence.
Ethical and Moral Reasoning:
Humans possess a sense of ethics and moral reasoning that guides their decision-making and behavior. While machines can be programmed with ethical guidelines, the nuanced and context-dependent nature of human ethics requires individual judgment and understanding.
In summary, the statement emphasizes the enduring importance of human learning and the unique qualities that humans bring to the process, even as machines become more intelligent. While machines can assist and augment human learning, they may not completely replace the depth, complexity, and individuality of human experience and cognition.
I notice you stated that machines can be programmed with ethical guidelines, can you give an example?
Certainly. An example of ethical guidelines for programming machines could include prioritizing user safety, ensuring data privacy, and avoiding discriminatory decision-
I think that 21st-century learning emphasizes collaboration and critical thinking skills. Institutions are incorporating project-based learning, group assignments, and discussions into their curriculums. Technology tools like interactive apps and social media platforms enhance virtual classrooms. Traditional classrooms will remain relevant in the future of education. Educators must monitor and regulate technology usage to adapt to the fast-paced times.
You say interactive maps and social media platforms will enhance classrooms. Can you give an example?
Interactive maps can provide collaborative and interactive learning opportunities, offering a dynamic and engaging way to learn about a variety of topics. With interactive maps, you can visualize data and information in a way that is easy to understand and analyze, making it an effective tool for teaching complex concepts or ideas. Moreover, interactive maps can be customized to suit the needs and interests of your classroom, making it a flexible and adaptable tool for learning. Interactive maps allows users to share information and insights with each other. For example, you can use maps to create group projects or activities that encourage users to work together and share their knowledge and expertise. Overall, by leveraging the power of interactive maps for collaborative and interactive learning, you can create a dynamic and engaging learning environment that promotes active participation in class, knowledge sharing, and skill development.
I completely agree with opinion 'C' because school is Important in a person's development. There is many things that we have to do but AI may not be with us. There is a lot of things that we can learn from AI but not everything.
I am not telling to stop using it, i am telling to use it less . School teaches us the discipline and gives us the emotion but AI is just the artificial intelligence made of human which cannot give us the things or can't be with us in every time.
Thank you.
Hello!
So from my own perspective I think Opinion A is not even something I would consider, this is because as humans we are meant to try and learn and develop ourselves in any way we can so if we say machines will do the learning for us who will develop better technology than AI. Yes AI is a really big step in human technology and development are we going to just stop there ,I mean after all we didn't stop trying to develop better technology than the first generation computers which at their time was also a huge technological advancement.
I do on the other hand agree with option B and C and think humans need to learn for ourselves and continue developing ourselves
“School is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with.” Schools do more than pass information, they build lives by helping students learn about morals that will make them great individuals in future. In school we learn about diversity and the importance of tolerating one another, we can also apply what we learn in our daily lives in school as this is a bigger environment to do so. Schools can help us make connections and get long lasting relationships that will useful even in our old age.
I strongly agree with opinion B because we humans still need to learn for ourselves . We shouldn't just let AI do all the job for us. For instance, a student can seek help from AI for his/her assignment if having difficulties with it, but that doesn't mean everytime whether the student understands the assignment or not he/she still go ahead and ask AI to solve everything and just copy it. The student might be enjoying this way of learning, but the student is slowly degrading intellectually and whenever the student has an exam he/she will have difficulties because of too much reliability in AI. If a student want to learn with AI that student should learn with the aim of understanding not just copying what the AI suggests without understanding it.
"People will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too." I believe if we think for ourselves we can gain more knowledge and in turn program more information into the robots to make them better for our usage. Robots after all are being programmed by humans so if humans do not learn and improve on their skills how will they make the robots better? Another reason I have chosen this option is because in school the teachers do not just teach us but they pour out their emotions into the teaching which is something that robots lack. For example when a robot teaches you and a test is carried out, the robot does not care if the pupils will pass the test or fail the test but with humans, when a pupil is failing they are genuinely concerned and
always think about possible ways to help that pupil succeed in their academics. For this particular reason,
different methods of teaching will meet the specific needs of each child. We cannot get
this from machines.
We have heard rumors about AI dominating Earth in the future haven't we? In my opinion, Humans need to learn to control the AI. We created it and if we don't learn enough to control it, it will lose control and will dominate the world. I strongly disagree with option A, if AI does the learning, we will not be able to control it. I partially agree with option B because humans do need to learn for themselves but also to control these intelligent machines. For me option C is the most logical. School is not only about learning information. We learn to socialise. We make bonds, the bonds that will never break and also we make memories that tell us to keep living even in our hardest times. We also learn to deal with AI and internet.
I agree with opinion C. Yes AI is a very powerful tool, it can teach us almost everything from the smallest of things like atom to the biggest of things like stars, the beginning of our country's history and many more but as with everything present in this world nothing is perfect. From an outside perspective AI may look perfect, a tool that you can use to access all the knowledge the world can provide but it cannot in fact provide all the knowledge the world has. An AI will never be able to make us feel and understand emotions. An AI will never would never be able to help us understand the importance of friends and family. An AI will never be able to make us understand mannerisms. An AI will never be able to make us experience excitement, nervousness, happiness, sadness, sorrow, etc. An AI will never be able to give us the joy of accomplishing something. An AI would never be able to feel and understand our emotions. An AI will never be able to inspire us. The only place we can get all of those is school. School is not just a place where we go to study and learn. It is a place where we socialise, where we make friends, where we discover what it feels like to go infront of mass, what it feels to overcome your fears, what it feels like to enjoy the moment we have with our friends, what it feels like to interact with others similar to you, what it feels like to achieve something, what it feels like to win in life, what it's like to be proud of yourself, what it means to find yourself. Every single thing that may seem small to us or dismissive, none of those things can ever be given to us by an AI. At the end of the day school is not just a place to study it's a place to build ourself it's a second home to every student. An AI will never be able to provide such things and that is why school is important.
I agree because.... in school , we learn a lot; Not only in academic aspects but in other various aspects like social development , critical thinking , development of self confidence and more.We experience what we are taught in school.
I strongly agree with opinion C. School is not only for learning information. Learning or studying information is only a part of student life . Other than learning, there is a most important thing for human being called discipline. Discipline is a most important thing as it teaches us how to behave our teachers, parents and friends. In our school our teacher's teach that we have to respect seniors and love juniors. AI may can teach us the lessons of book but remember it cannot teach those things like discipline as it doesnot has feeling's. AI cannot teaches us how can we become a good human being but teacher's can teach us how we can become a good human being. Remember AI is made by human being and their is no any other thing that is more intelligent than a human being . AI is not greater or intelligent than our teachers. We can be successful only by following the teacher's and parent's guidance.
In my opinion, I highly agree with Option B because it acknowledges that while machines can assist with knowledge acquisition, humans still need to be actively involved in the learning process. While machines may be able to process and store vast information, they are still ultimately dependent on human's input and guidance. Option B suggests that people need to take responsibility for their own learning, even if they choose to use the assistance of machines. This is important because it encourages people to continue to develop their own critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, rather than relying solely on artificial intelligence or other technologies to do the work for them.
I strongly believe that there will always be school even in the future because without the school we humans can no longer control the AI, but what I want to lay some emphasize on how school will look like in the because I strongly believe that it is going to be in a new form from what is is use to be.
School of the future will be forwarded, and robot will replace the teacher which will now be teaching. And further more I think that classroom will now be in our different houses no more in the school again and definitely, they will learn through computer, tabs and mobile phones. Further more, they will have virtual classroom and e-learning facilities.
Some of the important feature that will characterize the future school are:
1: Teachers will be replaced by AI.
2: As a student you will have to learn alone inside your personal room
3: School will definitely get boring as learning and answering of questions is a boring idea without many people (classmates)
4: School will now be in our different houses not in schools any more.
So, what I'm trying to say is that people will always need to learn for themselves too and this will also help us humans to be able to handle this machines anytime that they have any fault because I know that they must be a fault. Just that the nature of school now will not be the same by that time because of the presence of AI.
I agree with the opinion C. School is not just about learning informations it is important for personal development, discipline, responsibility, socialization and cultural understanding. School help students to develop important life skills such as communication, teamwork, time management and organizational skills. It helps them to develop friendship and exposes students to different cultures, perspectives. It prepare students for life in multicultural society.
I completely agree with opinion B. 21 st century is the modern and advance century where the science and technology are becoming more and more advance. Technologies like mobile phone, laptop, computer,etc has made the work of human beings easier. People are completely dependent upon the machines as students are using this type of technologies for doing simple calculations of mathematics . Many students are completely dependent on Chat gpt or other guide for doing their works. We should not be completely dependent upon machines to do our works. We should be
creative. We should not use calculator to do simple calculations, we have to use our common sense. It will increase our writing skill and communication skill if we write the answers in our own way. If we do mistakes it doesnot matter. There is a quote called " Practice makes man perfect." We will be successful if we do mistakes. We learn by doing mistakes so we have to be creative and we should not be completely dependent upon machines, even if machines are more intelligent.
I think option B is suitable for me. This is why I say so; humans learn everyday and can become efficient over time because of continuous practice. It is more efficient for humans to learn and work. Scientists say that humans need to work so as to live healthier and longer. It also is best for humans to develop their brains and think critically so as to function and perform well at the long run. Being an emphatic person, I have to consider the financial stability of people, who will pay for their bills and take care of their families if they are out of jobs?
Absolutely! In the future, schools will continue to exist, but they might change. Imagine using really cool technology and learning things in new and exciting ways. Schools could become more flexible, letting you learn at your own pace. They might focus on teaching you important skills like thinking critically and being creative, so you're ready for whatever comes your way. Even though schools might not look the same, they'll still be there to help you learn and grow.
I agree to option C due to the fact While it is right that machines can help in analyzing information, the cost of going to high school extends beyond simply obtaining facts. Schools play a important characteristic in shaping well-rounded human beings by using fostering social competencies, creativity, crucial wondering, and high solving abilities – elements that machines won't be capable of completely replicate. The lecture room surroundings provides possibilities for collaboration, verbal exchange, and private development, which is probably vital for navigating the complexities of life. So, even in a international with smart machines, attending university remains vital for the human elements of training that cross past mere data absorption
I agree totally with your comment because, we go to school not only to obtain formal education or information, but to develop our communicating, creativity, critical thinking etc. all this that machines can't instill in us. For instance, my school in Nigeria not only focuses on classroom activities, they expose us to smaller, minute things that really make impact in the society at large for example how decent you look whenever you step out of the dorm, how you interact with your fellow classmates, your punctuality etc. and this things has really go a long way in molding morally sound and great minds. I mean, I owe school a lot of gratitude for the life changing experiences that it has exposed me to in order to make me a better person. Yes machines make work easier and faster, but the input school has made in the lives of students worldwide can never be replicated by any machine.
I completely disagree with the opinion A. Its a fact that AI can provide us with all the information that we need but for this we should have at least some knowledge about the topic. If we do not have idea then we cannot get sufficient answer or information . But in school we are facilitated with completely new learning beyond our actual knowledge.Teacher helps us to understand any new topic by giving examples about the topic and making it easier to understand. AI can provide deep information but we need to understand the topic by ourselves only . So, AI is a great invention but it cannot provide the knowledge about the societial norms and values that school is continuously providing from past few decades.
I choose option C Because I believe schools will continue to exist in the future. AI cannot perform all human duties , lacking comprehensive knowledge about the world , particularly in areas like biology where their aspects of reproductive systems and organs limit their understanding. Humans must continue addressing the partial aspects AI might miss and staying updated with every day news
I strongly agree opinion A Because I honesty think about the future school and AI. School is the place Where we go for learning. In now days we go to school for study.But In future, We have powerful AI which will be very good and effective for us.We Don't have to go to school. The AI and machines will do work for us.We Don't need a School in future. We can learn, study and more things in online through AI and machines. So,I think there's no need a school in future Because of AI and machines.
I strongly disagree with opinion A because I feel as if AI's purpose is not to fully take upon our everyday human activities, school has been a norm for us people for an extended period of time, allowing people to interact with one another to get a broad understanding of material being taught. Surely AI could answer unknown areas in a certain material being learnt, although with human connection, instructors, teachers, etc, they're able to physically/visually demonstrate content, for this can be helpful for some scholars. Furthermore, AI will decrease our intelligence, ability to navigate on our own, and independence.
Oh no!
Not going to school is not an option because machines are taking over.
Machines are inventions created by man and the men had the knowledge, where did they get it from. Most of it were from school.
They are lot of bad things that will happen if humans don't go to school
-People nowadays say that humans are not up to the level of machines. And people are considering not going to school because machines are taking over. Once they stop, won't machines be better than humans since they have no knowledge, both will be incomparable.
- If humans stop learning, who will create the future machines? Who will repair? Who will programme?
-History will be partially forgotten...
- People won't know how to even use/operate the machines
I disagree with all of these opinions because school is the 2nd stage of learning. Though AI a plus point for human beings in every scope of education, it cannot be compared with school. In a school a students can learn things by their own, cause self learning is the most important part of student life. On the other hand AI can not teach any one. AI is the technology by which information can be stored in human mind. Recently scientists have invented a chip. This chip is fully AI generated.This chip will be attached on human brain and this chip will help human brain to solve any problem. Though it is a good idea but if a child is not well taught from his childhood he or she cannot prosper in life. In this case schools can be a good option. AI is just a helping han for us but if we become fully dependent on AI, this might become a threat for our student life.
“School is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with.”
I completely agree with this statement. While machines and technology have become invaluable tools in the learning and educational process, there are aspects of education that go beyond the acquisition of information. School plays a vital and beneficial role fostering social skills, critical thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence with the interaction of pears– qualities that are essential for success in various aspects of life.
In a regular everyday school setting, students learn to collaborate, communicate effectively, and navigate social situations. These skills are challenging for machines to replicate as they require a deep understanding of human emotions, context, and sometimes cultural beliefs. In addition, the classroom environment provides a space for students to engage in discussions, debates, and other beneficial educative activities, which contribute to a more holistic and well-rounded education.
Also, the personal interactions between students and teachers offer valuable mentorship and guidance that extends beyond the scope of AI. Teachers serve as role models, helping students develop values, work ethic, and a sense of responsibility.
On the contrary, I believe that the emphasis on traditional schooling tends to undervalue the potential of technology in education. While the classroom setting may provide some opportunities for social interaction and mentorship, the rapidly advancing capabilities of machines and online learning platforms are transforming the way we acquire and apply knowledge. The idea that machines can't assist with fostering skills like critical thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence is becoming outdated. Online forums, interactive simulations, and adaptive learning technologies can offer personalized and engaging experiences, catering to individual learning styles. Additionally, the modern workforce often requires proficiency in technology, and embracing digital learning can better prepare students for the demands of the future. Therefore, it's crucial to acknowledge and leverage the benefits that technology brings to education rather than solely relying on traditional school structures.
In summary, while machines excel at delivering information and facilitating certain types of learning, the multifaceted nature of education extends beyond data processing. School remains a crucial institution for shaping well-rounded individuals equipped with the social and emotional intelligence necessary for success in an ever-changing world.
I heavily disagree with option A, because when they said "no need to go to school when machine will do the learning for us" we can not just say we will not go to school because even with the use of machines because we humans have emotions or feelings that machines don't have, and besides we humans are who created Artificial Intelligence and we cannot just stay and leave the AI takes over us.
I'm looking forward to corrections
Thank you
The lives of the handicapped are being significantly improved because of AI. Giving disabled people greater resources is one area where AI actually shines, similar to personalized learning. For children with writing challenges or limited mobility, speech recognition software like Nuance can help with word transcription. With the aid of these technologies, teachers will be able to provide pupils with superior study materials that more effectively meet their individual needs.
I strongly agree with straightforward beaver because ai actually improve young ones in terms of learning languages and how to pronounce words. Softwares like Duolingo helps both young and old to learn how to speak a particular language.
You will get to find out that some teachers might not be able to detect when a student pronounces a word correctly or not but AI will automatically detect when AI a student pronounce the word well and will tell the student to take it again.
I think that's the best way to discipline students in the ways they pronounce their words.
It also help students in word translations.
AI is made to help us cope with daily difficulties and to make our life easier, not to replace us. People should have opportunities in education, strive to achieve their future dreams and goals and develop their intellectual, physical and mental gifts and skills.
I really like your example of Duolingo!
I Disagree with option A because as stated in option A, Artificial Intelligence will do the learning for us this means that if it learns for us it develops knoledge that it is not suppossed to it may develop negative knoledge to wards humanity.
the main reason why i disagree with option A is because this option empowers AI negative knoledge and if a does the learnig for us it will get were humanity is soley relaint on AI as it deduces our basic human survival skills, for example with a malfunctionig AI if human soley rely on AI we may not have the basic knoledge as to fix it, The next generation may not all survival skills that we have currently due to AI.
Just as phones have negative things attached to it AI will have negative precautions so as rules on usage AI should.
I am strongly disagree with option A because AI are not slaves they are invented to helps us if we use too much AI we will be lazy and some health problems may occur and school is the place to learn the things we can't say we shouldnot go to the school we should also know for ourselves even AI are more intellegent . We cannot forget that AI are invented by humans and If noboby will go to the school the how people can know that how AI are made an how to operate them other generationsalso should know how to use AI and how to operate them and this will be possible if we will go to school so it is important to go to school even the AI are talented .😊
I strongly disagree with option A. Because there is a saying that says "YOU CAN FORCE A HORSE TO THE STREAM, BUT YOU CAN'T FORCE IT TO DRINK WATER". From the best of my knowledge AI can only source out what you need but they can't force you to assimilate and understand and this makes it difficult for them to do all the learning for us. It is like a fifty-fifty bargain, they give us what we need and we accept and implement them. And this option A is painting a picture of trying to cast out school and this is actually very unacceptable. Although AI is capable of variety of functions, but the one thing I think it is not capable of is the vital function a school plays in the lives if people. For a matter of fact, the school not only gives us formal education but it teaches vital virtues that can be important in the life of an individual, for example hardwork, and so allowing AI do all our learning for us neglects the whole point of hardwork and makes us lazy. Don't you think so?
I strongly disagree with statement "A" ....... Y,all actual human teachers play a crucial role in motivating students, providing guidance, and offering mentorship with better emotions while machines can process information and perform tasks based on existing data... Us humans are filled with curiosity and creativity which makes schools encourage creative thinking and innovation which are essential for better learning with real and practical challenges improving our social skills and practical thinking...
Yes I respect your opinion human teachers play great role in teaching learning activities. AI is neither wort nor best for humans . By means of AI students are losing their power to think they don’t know about originality. They copy all from AI . Human teachers play crucial role in motivating and guiding students rather than Ai
That’s all from my knowledge
You should also think about others. AI is especially helpful for those who are weaker than others. Think of situation where you are running late on an assignment. AI is a major source of help for you. I respect and also agree with you're opinion but I also think that AI can be more helpful than teachers sometimes.
Thank you!
Yes I agree too !! You can ask AI about things that you can't ask with teachers comfortabaly yet using AI means using ICT tools which include phone and pc...this may not be relatable to the certain topic but using phone means its likely for the user to be addicted and be dependent in AI answer rather than teachers...Honeslty I have tried doing hw with AI (maths) but even if they seem to give the right answer they don't seem to explain it very well...Well Yes the AI in future will describe it better though yet I feel that face to face study is better but your answer is also quite right..AI can be useful than teachers some time too..! :)
The beginning of Artificial Intelligence(AI) has brought about a profound transformation in both education and work.... AI offers a wealth of possibilities for revolutionizing the way we learn and work. but,AI can also destroy the thinking skills and creativity of humans,especially students..We are taught how to develop our creativity from a young age and to learn from our mistakes...If AI is used,we may become less proficient at flexing our creative muscles...
I also trust that there is a lot that machines can help with in our daily lives and I hope that all this does not go to waste.
I agree because, yes AI mechanics are been created to help us and also not forget that they are being created to enhance us as humans to make us better than our past self so actually.
So in conclusion, they will still be school so as though the help of AI school will make the next generational school to become easier and a better place for the students to acquire more knowledge and understanding of the AI better. Thank you.
I agree with the option C.. while machines can certainly help with learning information, there are many other important aspects of education that require human interaction and collaboration. Schools provide students with opportunities to develop important skills such as social interaction, critical thinking, and communication, which are essential for success in both personal and professional life. Humans are social creatures, and interaction with others is a fundamental aspect of our development and well-being. Schools provide students with opportunities to interact with peers, teachers, and other adults in their community, which can help them develop social skills, empathy, and perspective taking. Overall, while machines can certainly help with some aspects of learning, there are many important skills that require human interaction and collaboration, which cannot be fully replaced by machine learning. Schools are an important place where students can develop these skills, and are essential for their success in both personal and professional life.
I strongly agree with Option B because it's true, being dependent upon machines won't help us evaluate ourselves and build our mind. It is true that machines are intelligent than us human beings but we are the inventor of those machines. If we push ourselves more further, we can increase our IQ and surpass our own knowledge, and intelligence. Also, machines are made to help us in our works we should be independent and always try to know and understand things by ourselves without the help of machines. But We may use machines if we aren't able to solve some problems and try to understand it. So, it is necessary for us to always learn by ourselves but we may use machines sometimes for our own good.
While machines and technology can certainly aid in the learning process, they cannot fully replace the value of traditional education. School teaches not only academic subjects, but also social skills, critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, which are all essential for personal and professional development. Additionally, human interaction with teachers and peers is a crucial aspect of education that cannot be replicated by machines. Therefore, even as technology advances, the role of traditional education remains important for holistic development.
Hello,
Starting with,
The role of schools in the future, alongside the presence of AI, is likely to develop. While AI can enhance education through personalized learning and automation, the importance of human interaction, creativity, and critical thinking suggests that traditional schools may endure, albeit with a transformed educational terrain that incorporates AI technologies.
It is a pleasure to witness the incredible progress and potential of artificial intelligence. While it is true that AI can be good at certain tasks, points A, B and C increase the validity.
View A shows the effectiveness of machines in learning, but View B accurately shows the ineffectiveness of personal learning. I agree with point C, knowing that school is not just about getting information i.e. It plays an important role in creating skills and qualities that machines cannot reproduce. The human touch in education, which includes creativity, intelligence and good thinking, has not changed. It's exciting to think about how combined progress in human learning and intelligence could create a better future! So, in my opinion schools will still exists in the future.
It is an indisputable true that artificial intelligence is inextricably intertwined with humans as they can work, behave and make decisions like them. However, i don't believe that AI can supersede learning so I firmly disagree with opinion A. Al is made to help us cope with daily difficulties and to make our life easier, not to replace us. People should have opportunities in education, strive to achieve their future dreams and goals and develop their intellectual, physical and mental gifts and skills. So, it goes without saying, that opinion B and C are absolutely right. School and education is something more than just learning. It is a manner of making new friends, develop your friendship circle and of course have fun and learn things you had never known before. Besides, trying and achieving or even failing is much better than having everything done without giving an effort.
I agree with point c, school is not only about learning but for other stuff. For example, school helps students to improve their social skills and to learn how to interact with people.Students have to learn how to be able to keep and make friendships.They also have to learn how to work with people and that is something AI cannot do.
I strongly disagree with opinion A because the machines that will teach us are created by us, how can we humans let AI that was created by to control us, and when we are always using AI for learning it will make us lazy imagine laying on your bed just asking AI what is noun,and let not forget that if we did not go to school then how will we be able to operate the machines.In summary all i said is that AI can't deal with one's emotions and feelings, i think that AI can't control the creator.
Im looking forward to correction
Thank you
Well in my opinion I think there's a school industry does not exist in the future the quality education would cause the advancement of technology and AI that schools are using. the quality of education in the future and education than we have now, but if schools do not exist in the future children will not get a better education that we have now and with the existence of AI school schools will be a great asset to the teaching of technological knowledge which will improve which will add more great leaders to our society.
I strongly agree with the opinion C as the school is the place where most of the people grow. Most people learn how to walk how to talk in school. In school we learn how to write, how to talk, how to make friends, how to use our time. I can strongly say that the AI machines cannot help with those things. School is like our second home. School shows us the way and we are the one who decides to go to right way or wrong way. School is to make us capable to do the things that we could do as AI machines can’t help up achieve do it. SO IT IS WHY I AGREE EITH OPTION ‘C’
Firstly I would be going for the option (C) because it contains both option (A,C) which I want to both debate and argue on the fact that schools aren’t just for learning schools also teach good morals and values and how to be self-reliant and independent I think the fact that (AI’s/ROBOTS) have massively influenced the world make humans have a lazy attitude to work.
I agree with opinion C. At school you learn to be sociable, you learn to tolerate different types of people, and school actually helps you go against discrimination of different types as normally you meet people from all around the world of different races, tribes or beliefs. School also helps to learn how to speak and act in different countries or continents.
School is much more than learning information; school helps you have a positive and sociable future.
I wholeheartedly concur with assertion A, which holds that schools can be overtaken by machines. Technology development has the power to change the way that education is delivered. By providing individualized learning experiences, increasing access to education, and boosting productivity, machines can replace traditional educational institutions. Students can learn at their own pace thanks to machines that can customize curricula to meet individual needs according to adaptive algorithms. Remote or underprivileged students can receive education through online platforms, guaranteeing equal access. In order to increase efficiency, machines can also give interactive simulations, current content, and administrative task automation. Even though there are reservations regarding social interaction and the human touch, machines can be made to include these features. Accepting the promise of machines can lead to the development of an efficient, individualized, and accessible educational future.The benefits exceed our expectations. Even though AI are incredibly costly, the overall cost of raising a child's career is undoubtedly higher than the cost of purchasing an AI, isn't it? Given how advanced these technologies are currently, it stands to reason that they will be able to impart more knowledge more quickly. Naturally, the majority of people will favor them since their children will be under their direction, supervision, and care. Furthermore, if a youngster is lucky enough to have an AI teacher, they most likely learn more than eight teachers might teach in eight periods a day.
I disagree with you on option A. While it is undeniable that AI will offer pros like placing teachers in underprivileged countries where they might not have access to qualified teachers, or adapting to children and their special needs, there are a lot of cons to consider. A huge con is the loss of jobs possibly from replacing the traditional classroom for AI. As well, some children learn from emotional ties. They need to see a face to the name. Online learning programs that we have today and I have personally used, are great for helping me get the gist of a concept. However, I need someone to physically be there and use real life tools like counting blocks to actually get me to understand. You mention that majority of people would favor AI since it would be under the parent’s supervision. While I do see this point, it is more realistic to realize that a lot of times things may slip under a parent's radar, and it might raise ethical questions for parents who only want their children to learn certain things. AI in its current state is very young, and I expect that instead of overturning traditional schools, it will certainly evolve it.
While technology can assist in learning, the role of traditional education is likely to evolve rather than disappear entirely. Schools may focus more on fostering critical thinking, creativity, and interpersonal skills, complementing AI-based learning. The integration of technology doesn't necessarily eliminate the need for human interaction and guidance in the learning process.So basically in the future there will be schools that will teach us creativity and interpersonal skills....
I agree with you because over years obviously new plans will evolve which will help change old laws and rules.These schools can also develop the skills you mentioned because , probably, in the future, basically everything will be AI based so if schools do not educate students on AI, then in the future, students at that time will struggle to catch up with the economy.
I truly disagree with option A because schools are not just some buildings; they are our tradition! I truly belief that AI has brought many benefits in our lives but back in the time the universities such as Harvard, Stanford and including all our schools were not built that one day due to an innovation their functioning will stop! The job of teaching needs a trait of human connection which is a must which lacks in the system of AI, which is why I truly believe that in future there will be an existence of schools no matter what ! Because in schools we learn the moral values of life and the system of AI itself lacks the quality of consciousness, then how can we rely on the machines for this purpose, isn't this concerning? Indeed it is!
Really, how true this sentence is-
"Schools, where traditions weave the fabric of education, stitching together the past, present, and future".
I agree with opinion C, though it will be exciting to have an AI as a teacher, school is more than a place where students come to learn and study. School is a place where students can develop and master everyday life skills such as communication and collaboration, and as the famous saying goes “No man is an island” School is also a place where students can express their talents, abilities and emotions and that is one thing an AI cannot express.
I strongly disagree with point B simply because school is not just about learning, if so, obviously machines might have done it for us. School is about associating and tolerating new people with different mindsets and coming from different backgrounds. For example, AI will never teach us how to communicate with other people. Experience is the best teacher. People must not be told how to cope with people, rather, they must discover the soft skills needed to be with people without hurting them. In addition, AI will not really give us more opportunities with people. When the students grows up, they might meet old friends in school who will help them with whatever they want to do.For example, in my country, when you want to register for a visa, you need to join a long line but when the students sees their old colleague that has a connection there, that colleague can help them leave
the long line and get the visa done quickly.AI will have nothing to help with at this point of time.To conclude, I feel that it is better if we went to school ourselves and learnt ourselves because it will be nice to have some information that an AI machine does not have.
I strongly disagree with opinion A.Yes AI can do learning for us but if we humans become reliant on it, its basically us lowering ourselves to bow to our own creation. AI is just a machine and doesn't have the amount of social and interactive skills needed for teaching. In my opinion schools will continue to exist in the future and AI would just be an assistance tool in the school. School covers various range of fields, there are schools to learn music, dancing, drawing, etc and the general school we know. Its impossible for an AI to teach drawing perfectly to a human. Imagine a child with the dream of becoming an artist learning his skills by a machine that can't even communicate with his emotion the way humans can, what if the child decides to give up due to stepbacks - the AI wouldn't be able to encourage the child to do more. If schools cease to exist who would eduacate the future generations on how to operate this AI and even equip them with skills to create better technologies. Going to school helps in giving children communicative and social skills due to being among their peers, if schools should cease to exist the world might become a quiet one where everyone is cooped in their houses being taught by their AI without having communication with anyone.
I prefer choice B because I strongly believe that human-driven learning will always be necessary. The fact is, education is not just a transmission of information even with the advent of smart machines. School is an environment for creating skills and experiences which can’t be imitated by machines. Although AI is well-suited to working with data, true learning involves more than just knowing facts. Inside classrooms, critical thinking, creativity and social skills—the things needed to steer through life’s complex challenges—are developed among students; something which machines are yet to have full understanding about. In short, education forms the basis upon which an all-round understanding and flexibility can be cultivated; thus making it an indispensable tool for developing individuals capable of flourishing in a complicated world.
While you all made some arguably strong points on your choices I'm going to go with option B as being the most accurate point. As much as artificial intelligence will probably continue to be used more and more by people across the World, the need for people to have knowledge and understanding of common information is definitely compulsory. Just because there is a new way to do things does not mean the old should be forgotten. I agree with methodical_cicada as his/her points are very much valid. As the people continue to evolve into an era of artificial intelligence and technology that helps us, so do the people continue to discover and understand new information. Apart from this artificial intelligence is very much evolutionary, but if one can't depend on himself, what happens the day that AI shuts down or for some reason can't be accessed? Learning is just a part of the human demeanor. Even if artificial intelligence continues to influence our education I believe schools will continue to run and people will continue to go to school and learn. However, the future is very questionable and it is, however, possible some drastic change will lead to differences in our way of learning as of present day.
I disagree with opinion A.I think that there will be schools but with a difference. Robots are taking the part of the teachers and the students are going to finish school earlier...
The world is evolving and so is your mind the input of knowledge is very productive for the brain it makes the brain active and thirsty for more information and if 'there is no point in going to school when machines can do the learning g for us ' then we might as well let the machines work for money as well do so many things that require the brain to do for us AI just because there are machines that does not mean laziness should be practised everyday . AI are smart and do not need to earn just programmed and they know what to do they're like dogs give them a command and they do. The human brain is avle to process and grasp information within 13 milliseconds and that is really fast if 'there is no point in going to school when machines can dothe learning for us' that is just a lzy person talking.
I firmly stand with option B,"People will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too." For a number of reasons, because A.i was created to assist our lives. For instance; a calculator's main purpose is to assist you with problems, if it wasn't created to do that then it would be able to solve every math problem on earth and there wouldn't be a need for mathematicians or even teachers. If people do not learn for themselves who would create such machines or A.I they are so heavily reliant on. It wouldn't be possible and no doubt that machines are intelligent, but what is the purpose of our existence if we don't learn. That is why I strongly agree with option B.
I strongly agree with option B, because in as much as machines aid in facilitating tasks that may be daunting, humans are behind the brain of these machines. It is evident that these machines have been programmed to function perfectly in certain circumstances that may not require human input. However how can a machine be operated without humans controlling them? For example: I see cranes on a construction site around my neighborhood lifting heavy weight materials that could never have been carried by humans, yet it is always controlled by humans.
In conclusion, people have to learn by themselves to be more efficient in cases where these machines might fail.
I really like that you used an example from your community. Do you think that AI could control the cranes on the construction sight one day? why/why not?
Thank you for the question, Steff.
Based on how the world is depending on AI these days, I do believe that AI would have control over the cranes on a construction site, because they help humans move heavy bricks and heavy metals for construction sites. As far as I am concerned humans are behind the brains of these machines so I do think AI will control the cranes on the construction site in the time to come.
In my opinion machines cannot replace schools and most of all education. To be educated means to stimulare real-life experiences that also convey so many human feelings. Of course machines can help learning to be more tecnologically advanced but cannot help students to feel and express emotions.
I completely agree with you, school provides us with a place to socialise with new people that we wouldn't have met if it wasn't for school.
School helps us learn how to manage our emotions in real life situations. For instance, if you get into an argument with a friend it can teach you how to resolve problems and talk to each other in a calm manner. Another example is getting a bad score on a test, this can show you how you remember information whether it be through mind maps or flashcards.
Manners can also be learnt through our school systems, this is through learning how to correctly and kindly address teachers or how to not talk over people. These can't be learnt through Artificial Intelligence and AI will never be able to truly grasp these sorts of scenarios and teach them to a child.
I strongly agree with opinion C because although school is made for learning I feel that there is more to school than learning. For example, at school we may be learning about math and reading etc however we also learn to use creativity, social skills ,problem solving and maybe finance. Social skills are a great example of something that we learn at school that AI cannot teach us. We also learn about meanings of friendship and other independent skills. In conclusion I believe that AI shouldn't be in schools to teach or to take away schools because they are the "better option" which they are not. Real human teachers can help and teach us better than an AI teacher could.
i dont' agree with point A. We all know the world is changing! While the world is changing , children's education is changing too! I believe that in the next century robot/ machines may replace teachers but is this a postive or negative thing?
For me, this will be totally negative. the truth is that AI is a very useful tool for humanity but that doesn't mean that we have to let it conquer and control our lives because if that happens , it will be unfortunately the end of humanity. so the best that we can do is to depend on our own skills as humans.
I strongly disagree with option A. Humans are the most advanced species, owe our intelligence to education. School place a crucial rule in shaping our lives and knowledge our understanding of the world, emphasizing the importance of attending school to acquire essential knowledge. So I strongly support option C. Because machines can't do everything for you, you have to learn to do some things by yourself.
I have come to a complete disagreement with the opinion that school may not exist in the future. We cannot deny the fact that online schools and course and slowly getting more rampant. Regardless, we must take note that attending school while being physically present has been the best method of education over the years. It helps the ensure the engagement of the students and it also improves their social skills and confidence. We mustn't forget extracurricular activities such as clubs and sports activities. School not only helps to teach its students basic knowledge about how the world works but it also instills in them the right values and skills.
If we terminate the school system, what kind of leaders will emerge into power tomorrow?
That's an interesting perspective. Schools are much more than just a medium for us educate ourselves. It involves a lot of social aspects. Do you think concept and structure of school as we have today, will change in the future due to implementation of more robust AI?
Yes, I do believe that school will have to undergo some changes just as society will in the future as a result of the utilizing of more AI. Regardless, one thing I believe will never change is the idea and purpose of school and its importance.
Obviously, the way we know things today will eventually change whether forcefully or willingly although the termination of the school system is a lot far-fetched.
I strongly disagree with A because school teaches us things robots cannot. When the machines learn for us they can just give us answers. Which leads to laziness and then you wouldn't even want to do it for yourself. Learning for yourself builds confidence in yourself. So if machines are learning for us they are ruining our confidence.
I agree because we also think we should learn to do things for ourselves not asking machines to do everything for us
I choose option C. I disagree because if we stop school, doesn't it mean AI will rule humans? Uneducated people aren't qualified to become presidents, entrepreneurs, or leaders. Relying on AI completely would mean that's where human discoveries end. AI doing all the studying for us will eventually lead to the devolving of humans. If AI can create a superintelligence, it is possible that the superintelligence could decide that humans are obsolete. That's the formula for human extinction right there! Letting AI do all the work for us makes us vulnerable. Would we stop our creativity due to a great discovery when we are bound to discover greater things?
How about activities like sports, drama, and communication? School teaches us these things. Do you think machines can teach us these as well? or will they take over it instead?
I like how you have brought up the topic of sport - what effect do you think AI might have on sports education, or even professional sporting events like the Olympics and the World Cup?
"To be honest, I strongly disagree with option (A) because it somehow implies that humans are lazy and suggests that we will rely on AI to do everything for us, despite the fact that humans are the ones who created it. As reasoning_knowledge pointed out, if nobody goes to school, who will learn how to operate AI? Therefore, I completely disagree with option (A).
On the other hand, I strongly agree with option (B) because it acknowledges the fact that people will always need to continue learning for themselves, even with the presence of intelligent machines. Machines may possess intelligence, but they lack the capacity to experience emotions the way humans do, and they cannot teach in the same way that humans can. Furthermore, humans are inherently more intelligent than AI."
Thank you!
I disagree with opinion A because, if you don't go to school how are going to learn how to program and update AI devices? Also, humans will need to always develop their brains by learning and unlearning; schools are built to provide us with the right environment to train and harness our thinking capacity.
Additionally, AI devices are costly and cannot be acquired by everyone. There will be the need to balance affordability and accessibility.
Finally, as humans we have basic needs including clothing, food and shelter. No matter the advancement of technology, we will still need people to go into agriculture, road maintenance, etc.
I most definitely agree with option c. School isn’t about just learning it’s also about making connections with people, learning from mistakes, and proving your worth.School helps you understand what can really be going on in the real world and what you could do with your skills. For instance you use the skills you learn in home economics to help you cook , make clothes , and take care of yourself when needed. Could it be really be beneficial it to let a robot teach all these things and encourage you when you are down? Also it is very good to get other humans opinions from their own experience that you could be experiencing. Like maybe you just took a really big test and failed. A friend or teacher can give really good advice or talk about their experience with things like this. A AI would most definitely tell you to study more. This is why I agree with option c!
My top option is B since it caught my attention and made the point that while AI is important, humans still need to be knowledgeable. In addition, humans must be able to think critically, generate new ideas, and avoid becoming overly reliant on artificial intelligence. Humans need to learn to be able to envision several scenarios and understand that there is a solution for every issue.
Learning is essential since it develops our ability to be creative, analytical, and problem solvers. Even with advanced intelligence, machines lack the human element and insight that come from experience. When we acquire firsthand knowledge, we can discover our talents, pursue our hobbies, and grow as individuals. It all boils down to accepting the self-discovery process. Certain skills, such as intuition and empathy, are encoded into machines.
I strongly agree with opinion B. We as humans must not view AI as a crutch but rather as a tool to help us be more efficient and learn much more easily. I believe that all the education systems worldwide need to incorporate AI into their learning experiences. In my opinion, AI will improve the education system worldwide rather than replacing it and making it obsolete. I, for one, am an avid user of ChatGPT to learn complex physics topics with ease. I have never thought of chatGPT as a replacement of my teachers but rather as a helping hand, A compendium of sorts.
Regardless, no matter how advanced AI may become, It will never be able to provide practical experiences or improve our communication and emotional understanding abilities
We agree with C, we think school is important for other things apart from information such as developing friendships, developing social skills, and you might need a real person to help you learn and develop sporting skills. Robots might cause people nightmares! If robots taught us maybe we would never do anything for ourselves. Behaviour of students might get worse - would robots be able to control the behaviour of young people?
We agree with opinion B because AI can't develop emotions and at school not only do we learn important subjects, we also have to learn about emotional intelligence.
In addition to this, what would we do if AI was to malfunction? Without learning for ourselves at school, we would not be able to get a job in the future or succeed in life.
Also, school is not just for learning. It is important that we develop our social skills by making friends and building relationships- this is something that AI can't do for us!
How do you think building relationships helps you to get jobs in the future?
The majority of jobs in the future will involve working with other people, therefore it's essential to develop those fundamental relationship skills in order to ensure a healthy work environment. In a job interview, many work places will ask you about your teamwork skills.
Hello! We have been discussing Opinion C and our class has different views. Some of us felt that nowadays it's easy for us to Google information that we want or need to learn or we could just ask our friend or other people. However, lots of us agreed that school is more than just being taught information. One student described humans as "social creatures" that need interaction and others acknowledged that school helps develop our communication and social skills beyond the classroom. Although AI could have a positive impact on learning, most of us believed that we would trust and have better relationships with other humans. Overall we agree with Opinion C because we understand that school is more than just memorising information.
We disagree with A as not going to school would remove all of the vital social development that school provides through interactions with peers and teachers. AI may have access to all information but teachers break tasks down in a way that makes work more accessible which AI would not necessarily do. AI also lacks emotion which can make expression more difficult. Information and skills also needs to be learnt for situations where AI is not accessible.
I strongly disagree with option A and agree with option B because.... If we do not go school to learn, how will the next generatin be able to modify what is in the brain of the AI. I mean, we will have to add more functions and features to the robots we have now as we are evolving to carry out our respective needs. We still need to go to school and learn for ourselves us to be able add more functions to the AI.
Hi! I agree with statements B and C. I think that learning is a way for our society to evolve and develop further. If we stop learning just because there are robots that might be more intelligent than us, we're letting robots our planet, and if so in a future, they will dominate and control us. If we stop learning, the human specie would end up quickly.
If we decide to stop learning and thinking criticaly, which would be the reason of our whole development and existance of the past years? There wouldn't be any reason! In the past our main aim was to survive, but now, since we know more and better, we can use our knowledge to improve as an species and as humans.
Thank you!
Will school exist in the future? That’s a big question. However I think the answer is yes, school will still exist in the future. The third world countries are largely underdeveloped and will still require the traditional four walls of the school system.
Although I agree that there are already some form introduction of AI feature in some of our schools like the use of School Management software, we are still have a long way to go.
In conclusion, school will exist but just take a new form as we are already seeing obtaining certifications through online school.
I stronly agree with option C . School is a place where children let loose their doubts, inmagination,curiosity etc:
Most see it as a jail where you study all day, But thats not it!! If you see it in a fun way , you realize that school is not just about studying or knowledge, Its a safe haven where you make new friends , get your daily dose of social interaction, ask teachers funny doubts, join co-curricular activities ,get the experience of being scolded by your teacher , learn manners and respect,interact in class etc: Thus I strongly beleive that school is beyond learning a journey that students will cherish when they are older, but I do agree that AI can help out here and there.
I completely agree with option C “School is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with.” The experience that we get in school is impossible to get by any machines. The experience of making friends, respecting teachers, cooperating on a project, sharing info are the thing that make machines and school apart. Extra curricular activities and physical sports are also great aspects of being in a school. If we were to be just taught by a machine and given assignments, It would be just all about learning facts, wouldn't it? Ask yourself, If you had learned everything that you know now by a machine. What would be missing? The answer is all the emotion towards friendship, mistakes and improvements, urge to know answers, Emotion for self improvement and a lot more. I simply want to say that the machines and AI are not replacement for school to remove it but rather a extension to make studying better.
Thats all. Thank you :]
I strongly agree with B, because if students is not able to think and learn on their own the will not make the world a better place in the nearest future. They will only be depending on AI to do their homework and classwork for without no stress at all. It's good to have AI besides us assist and guide us on what to do and not to misuse it at all times.But now we have AI, which is here to help us and it actually makes it easier to make research about just anything you need.
thank you.👍
Actually as AI is rapidly increasing day by day, we can assume that in the future classrooms may not exist because the advanced machineries in future will compel the generation to learn everything at home. Just as example we can say that, in future the AI will be much more efficient and available that it can teach a newborn child what it should learn at the age limit s/he should know. Those AI it might be the robots or it might be a new kind of technology which will be again invented in the future. But it holds a very bad effect that the future child might not learn the norms of the society because the robot will do what it will be commanded or programmed for and as it is a human child it will except and reject what it wants or thinks it will be good for him/her. But in future classrooms will not exist which might teach him/her that social norm. But its true that in future the educational system will be more efficient than before because the brains at that time will be sharper than now. The amount of creativity, brainstorming power and other characteristics will be better than now which will have more good effects. In future more technologies will appear which will be able enough to disappear the classrooms and also its history as far as I can assume.
Of course, school will continue to exist in the future, if there is no school in the future, children will miss out on crucial learning opportunities. I don't mean to suggest that learning only happens in school,but without it,some children may not receive a proper education. Without schools,people might become lazy and not experience the discipline that comes with the stress of education. The education system should evolve in the future to address subject that AI currently can't reach,such as Art and biology
I strongly disagree with A because if AI became our personal slaves,humans will become lazy and more unhealthy. School stretches our minds and gives us exercise in PE,breaks and walking to school. If machines replaced children in their learning position, kids wouldn't even be able to do simple stuff like,reading,writing ,spelling and simple maths. Imagine a world were people spent the day lounging on the couch whilst they ordered robots to do stuff for them. B is very correct because we really need to learn for ourselves,filling our heads with knowledge and stuff to do. C is correct as well,in a way, because AI can't do everything such as they can't feel human emotions so they would never be a school therapist or someone that feels emotions. I very much hope that schools will be around in the future.
thank you
AI is the greatest invention made my humans. It is specifically developed to assist the humanity. Its for all ages since knowledge doesn't require any age limitations. That's why it is the huge boon to all the humans.
First of all, I strictly diverge from the opinion A. AI is a technology to help the things that any human doesn't know and they should never use AI to complete their all of the work. As the opinion A says that there's no point to go school which is a huge disagree by most of the people. There are still some knowledges in school which AI doesn't know of. I agree that AI is made for people to complete all of their unfinished work but it doesn't mean that a person should use it to do it's all work and if a person doesn't go to school , that person will be unheard of many things that he should know.
I will highly agree with option B as it says, "People will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too." People always need to learn themselves rather than going to internet. If a student learns by himself, he will be experienced and he won't have to rely on anyone or anything. A physical education should also be there as it is the most effective way for teaching-learning activities.
The option C might be the most agreed option since it tells us the importance of school and physical education. School is not just a place to get education, it instead is a place where we can learn some things that even AI is not able to do. That's why physical education should be there for students who wants to explore more things outside the internet.
Beside all those, the most engaging question is "Will school exist in future or not?". As for me, school is surely going to exist in future since there will assuredly be student or some people who will want to explore other things rather than AI. Even if the government decides to close the school, there will still be many of them who won't let it happen as school is the most holy place for the one who is interested in studies.
This was my opinion on the topic "Will schools exist in future?". If you find any doubts or disagreements, please feel free to give your thoughts on this topic.
Thank you...!
I don't agree with that statement A because school helps us learn more than just facts. It teaches us how to work with others, think for ourselves, and be creative things machines can't do for us.
I do agree with option B and C but disagree with option A because Machines are humanmade technology and for making machines we need knowledge. We gain knowledge for making those machines only if we read about it and search about it. We gain knowledge if we study hard and for studying we need to go to school. If we only use AI and machines we will not know about our skills and we will not be able to use our skills in future. Using AI and machines daily or too much can make us addicted to it which is bad for us. Imagine if we use AI and machines for small things what will we do when AI is banned and machines are destroyed or not working anymore. We will be in uncomfort right. We will not know what to do. For making machines to work again we need to fix it and for fixing it we should have information about it and we get those information my reading. So in my opinion I do not agree with option A.
Thank you for reading my point of view and I hope that you will also give suggestions or your opinion on this comment.
I trust that option B will be essential because of my experiences regarding the topic alongside the following reasoning:
Education is more than just learning facts; it's a profound journey that goes beyond what machines can do. While technology is good at giving us information, schools are important for other things. They help us develop critical thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence – things that make us human.
In addition, school education helps shape our character and teaches us values that make us resilient and adaptable in a world that's always changing. In classrooms, we talk with others, work on projects together, and improve our communication skills, which are all important for getting along with people. a problem that many people including me are trying to fix.
Furthermore, schools play a vital role in the socialization process, where students cultivate empathy, communication skills, character development, and adaptability. This social dimension of education becomes like a protector against the emotionally taxing effects of technological progress, ensuring that individuals not only acquire knowledge but also develop into well-rounded contributors to society. In essence, what schools provide extends far beyond information, encompassing the essential development of individuals for a healthy lifestyle. Even though machines evolve, the unique qualities cultivated through education will remain irreplaceable in the development of a thriving and harmonious society. Hence, schools will still most likely continue to exist in the future, helping people develop to ensuring a better future.
It's quite hard to choose a option.All the options given are properly strong in itself.
In my opinion Option A says that if we don't go to school and machines will learn for everyone then human's can stay home and continuously can try more experiments by themselves. But....I don't want to choose option A because having a advantage it may many disadvantages beside.
Option B and C are quite similar so therefore I would like to go with option B because I think that the skills that AI can have is the skills that human already had, that's what AI can support but if we humans go to school and do try to learn more then no one can bet human mind creativity and skills where human can build infinite ideas in their mind.
So I believe that"Learn for yourself machines are not everywhere to support us."
I choose b, because people will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too. I think no matter how much machines are intelligent it won’t change the facts that humans created the technology and it needs human to control and operate the machines. AI still strongly relies on human intelligence to carryout their the different tasks take for instance the Google assistant, Siri, Alexa and so many others still need human input to work and function properly so that the right information is passed and recieved. I also think that there is a very big deal to this matter of technology because of the world wide spread of digital gadgets hence it is important for humans to learn for themselves.
I think there are still some jobs that machines can never take over: such as care givers to aged people, sick people, and children this is because machines lack human empathy and emotions hence they are unable to feel and relate to human emotions, feelings, fears, worries and thoughts.
I disagree with the opinion A because ever since the creation of A.I was done, it was made for assistance rather than for our slavery. The overuse of A.I will make us more lazier and even if we would stop going to school, machines will do the learning for us isn't a guarantee. Learning is a lifetime experience which would stay with us even at our old age. Learning is what made humans successful to operate a complete-functional A.I. If no student get to learn, how will they operate A.I ?
For the rest of our generation, the knowledge to A.I would be crucial during their lifeline but for that learning in school is necessary. Though it's not like, everything should be learned at school's environment, we can learn things practically on other environment. A.I is a good source of knowledge for us to learn and it could teach everything theoretically but not the practical aspects such as mental skills, good communication skills, and for more we expand our knowledge but within the territory of A.I but when it comes to living life to life skills, it would be harder.
our class has chose B due to the fact we as humans have made the machines ourselves which makes us think that they will have limited intelligence and since they cannot understand emotions it will not help with lessons such as PSHE and social skills which school has taught us. Another reason that we chose B is because if power was to shut down there would be no other alternative as back up . However we could understand why you would disagree as some children learn better with apps, study's have shown that children learn better with teachers than with Ai that may not know how to teach properly and would not be professionally trained like teachers and it would cost a lot for the schools budget this is why we think B is the best option in this statement.
Well I completely disagree with A because, robots obviously can not learn on our behalf. We can only be there in physical form or just streaming it. I say this because if AI learns for us there is no way that they can input it into us. AI was made to aid us not make us couch potatoes. Also of fact, AI is limited to programming and cant adapt to new situations without re-programming.
I strongly disagree with the opinion A. Because to improve our vast technology, we need to go to school.
The thought of machines doing everything for us is certainly exciting! But should we really abandon the idea of going to school and rely solely on these machines? Absolutely not! Going to school is of utmost importance and here's why.
Firstly, going to school provides us with a well-rounded education. It's not just about learning facts and figures, but also about developing critical thinking skills, problem-solving abilities, and creativity. Machines may be able to provide us with information, but they cannot teach us how to think critically or come up with innovative solutions. School helps us expand our minds and develop skills that are essential for success in the real world.
Secondly, school is a place where we learn important social skills. Interacting with classmates, participating in group activities, and engaging in discussions with teachers all contribute to our social development. These experiences help us learn how to work collaboratively, communicate effectively, and navigate different social situations. Machines may be efficient in performing tasks, but they cannot replace the valuable lessons we learn through human interaction.
Moreover, going to school exposes us to a variety of subjects and interests. It allows us to explore different fields and discover our passions. Machines may be able to provide information on specific topics, but they cannot inspire curiosity or ignite a love for learning. School exposes us to a wide range of subjects such as art, music, literature, and science, giving us the opportunity to discover our strengths and interests.
In conclusion, while the idea of machines doing everything for us may sound appealing, it is important to recognize the value of going to school. School not only provides us with a well-rounded education but also helps us develop critical thinking skills, social abilities, and a passion for learning. So let's not give up on the experience and opportunities that school offers us.
So, That's why, we can't say that we don't need to go to school.
This is a very well-written answer. How did you go about writing it? Was AI involved in the process and, if not, can you explain which argument you think is the strongest, and who might disagree with it and why?
Such a well rounded comment. I definitely agree with your opinion noble_bee, the importance of classroom learning is numerous. A lot of students were able to learn better because of the presence of classmates who make learning fun and interactive. To be honest, there are a lot of accomplishments I wouldn't have been able to make if I wasn't with my friends, the care and support they give is one of a kind, we're now seem like a group cause we push each other to be the best we can be. Anytime one of us shows a tendency to derail from school activities, the others try to advise him or her, we made sure that we were always on top of the class while still encouraging friendly competition among each other, with this relationship, we have been able to maximize our potentials.
In summary, even though AI offers a large scale of knowledge, students still need school, combining both methods is best
Hello!
I strongly believe that AI was made to aid and assist humans not to do all the work for us. I believe that as humans we are all created with an inborn sense of creativity and curiousity. Bringing this to context I personally will never be in support of AI doing all the work for us. I feel that yes AI is a huge leap in human technological development and advancement are we going to stop at that is AI going to be the last technological advancement that humans create. I personally think no and this can only be possible if humans continue to learn new things to continue to improve the speed and efficiency of our day to day life.
So on this note I have to strongly disagree with Option A and I think Option B and C is the way to go because we have not finished solving our problems as humans
THANK YOU !!!
I disagree with opinion A.
First of all, I think that chlidren should write on their "human things" like their notebooks. Moreover, this opinion isn't right for me because students need to do their work in class interacting with their classmates. Machines are just to improve or add to a lesson anything that can be learnt autonomously.
What are the benefits of interacting with classmates? Does this need to be in-person?
Yes, because interacting with your classmates means that you can share your thoughts with them. Being in-person is the best way to feel better your friends
I believe that going to school is a very important issue. All kids should go to school because real life learning in class helps us to understand better the world and improve our thinking skills. Also going to our " learning house" is better than staying at home using our laptop to surf the internet. At schools we can take the thinking power to do a successful job in the future. So in my opinion no machines can replace teachers or learning.
I strongly agree with opinion A, there is no need for us to go to school when we could just do it behind our screens. Just like how students were learning around the world when there was pandemic, in the future we would be able to go to school virtually without having the stress of waking up early to get to school on time.
In conclusion it would be possible for us to learn without actually going to school.
I strongly disagree with you because during the pandemic, the virtual meetings was an improvisation. If it wasn't done, we would have had a hard time catching up with what we are supposed to learn. Why not go to school when we have the chance to? Waking up early and going to school teaches us a skill of time management which will help us plan our day accordingly. Knowing the times to sleep and wake up. School is also not just about studying. Students need to partake in extra curriculum activities. For example, playing football in school. This will help them to groom their talent and become better. School is also a place where we can meet new friends because when you are at home learning, you are around people you already know but you have to also discover different viewpoints and mindsets of others and develop on them.
Thank you.
I disagree because, while its amazing to use machines to extend your learning, actually going to school is even more helpful! It helps students prepare for the real world. You said that virtual goods are helpful with not giving students the stress of waking up early. While this is very good for students, in the future, students when they are adults will have to wake up early to get to work! On top of that, virtual school can also disturb the learning environment, due to the fact that many students have families, which may have other children in the house. On top of this, there may not be an available way to discuss problems with your work with your teacher! Imagine trying to do your work at home and then not being able to focus on your work at home and your siblings are being loud. Then you try to get help with your work, not being able to ask a teacher so you ask your guardian, and not even your guardian understands! Then imagine if your device gets destroyed or the battery dies, you'll have no way to continue with your class. Even if this doesn't convince you, going to school also increases your social skills, you know, those friends you have? Yeah, schools help increase your social skills by putting you in groups, letting you talk amongst your classmates about certain topics. So, technically, going to school will give you a even more beneficial learning experience than just learning off a screen.
I completely agree with option B . "People will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too." While machines can provide us with great amounts of information and helps us in various tasks, there is a unique value in personal learning and growth. Learning helps us develop critical thinking skills, creativity, and adaptability, which are essential for navigating the complexities of life. More importantly the process of learning itself can be incredibly fulfilling and rewarding. So, even with intelligent machines, the human desire to learn and explore will always remain important. In many situations even the most intellegent can’t help us so, we human should also learn to be dependent so that we can use both our mind and knowlegde in any situations.
I agree with opinion B because I feel that machines are created by people every single thing that AI has become was once an Idea in someone's head. If there are no more schools, no one will learn anything anymore; education allows innovative thinking. It's funny how a calculator was someone's idea of calculating numbers, equations and so much more, to think that if he/she hadn't gone to school we would not have what we call a calculator today.
I strongly agree with B because I think that learning new things are very important , but I do think that A.I can help us with it.Even though A.I is intelligent we should learn too and I am sure that some other students that are on Topical Talk may agree with me .The reason that I think that A.I can and should be in schools because it can help the teacher and it can make new learning styles .Schools should stay on this planet.This is Willing engine sighing off.
I strongly agree with opinion C, since schooling is not just about reading and writing or even acquiring knowledge on machines. There are some skills, such as communication, reasoning and the instillment of discipline that can never be acquired from machines. Even if robots are going to be programmed to do these, they will lack that empathetic ethic to react towards human sentiment, which will be a crucial adjustment to how we learn in schools currently.
I strongly agree with you, school isn't just about 'reading and writing' it's about learning how to deal personal issues, the way you talk to people, communicate and relate to people.
I heavily disagree with opinion A. AI does have the possibility to learn, However for AI to learn there has to be someone to feed this information to AI. For example, In order for chat GPT to know your interest you have to speak your interest and it'll elaborate and entertain said interest.Without someone teaching AI this information AI wouldn't be able to know at all. That's like saying it's possible to wake up and knowing a foreign language without any mention of learning this language.
I chose option C. This is because even with AI (artificial intelligence), it wouldn't help with social skills, or other skills you need in the real world. I disagree with A because what if something happens with technology one day? What will the future do? I also disagree with B because even though people need to learn for themselves, it will not help with real world skills as said earlier.
Hello Guys,
No I do not think that schools will exist in the future because,
All the classes that exist currently will all be online so there will be no need to to have face to face classes.
That will also lower the spread of diseases and illnesses that occur in face to face classes.
I deeply agree with opinion B, mainly because globally everyone needs to go to school for an education. If there is no one to truly think for themselves and only people relying only on Artificial intelligence, there wouldn't be much left for the future besides people not being able to live or function without AI. Artificial intelligence's main use is to make your and other people's lives easier, not to rely on it for everything and anything that comes to mind. With that being said, one will always at the end of the day need to think and learn for themselves and will always need to get an education.
I chose C for my answer because even though AI is smarter than it was a couple of years ago or two weeks ago, it doesn't mean that it is smarter than humans. Humans had to create AI so it could help us with our everyday lives, not replace things like school or work. A lot of people may think that "oh, no school would be good for homebodies" and I completely agree, but everyone needs an education from real humans.
I strongly agree with Option C. School is essential for things AI can't help with! With school, we can learn how to interpret word problems, correct grammar usage, and steps to create pieces of art that would wow the judges at an art contest.
For example, AI cannot help with the over reliance of technology. AI is something that is globally accessible, but what if, in a certain point of time, we can't access to our precious Artificial Technology? That one day, will probably be the time that we are so dependent on Artificial Intelligence, we will not remember life without it!
I hope others will support my claim, and realise that AI will not replace the human brain!
I disagree with option A because ai isn't used to work for us it is used to help us. There are some jobs that ai can do better than humans like being a cashier, but most jobs still require humans to do. imagine if there was a electrical that is ai only. If there were to be a malfunction who would be there to finish the job? So when our generation gets to the age to stop doing jobs if the next generation does not go to cool who would be doing the jobs that humans can only do. ai can do a lot of stuff but they cant do everything also don't forget that ai was created by humans. That Is why I think humans should still go to school because ai cant do everything for us.
I agree with opinion B because if AI were to completely "overthrow" school in a sense, people would be mindless. School, even as popularly unliked as it is, is really important to not only the common person, but society as a whole. Technology and it's advances are already making people lazy as well as helping. This is a double edged sword because there is indeed information that machines are fully capable of giving us solely for last minute purposes. But, even that being so, there is indeed information that we should learn early on so that we can keep it for the rest of our lives and live on with it without having to stop just to look up the answer. Relying entirely on something that was made to make life slightly easier isn't exactly an ideal way to live, in my most honest opinion.
I agree with opinions B & C. People will always need to learn by themselves. AI can be used to help but when people start abusing and using it for everything, it becomes a problem. I disagree with opinion A because school isn't just about learning. We make friends along the way & grow with them. Coming back to opinion C, the important things that AI can't help with are our emotions. Everywhere around my school I see students expressing their emotions with one another. Interacting with their friends, teachers, & administrators. We grow alongside our friends with our emotions, trust, & love. That's something AI can't imagine being able to do. Most of the time you find love, friends & your hobbies in school. These experiences make you a better person & shape your future. In conclusion, school is a big important part of your life. You have the best & worst experiences there. Sure some people may want AI to takeover just for the sake of not having to go to school, but I wouldn't give up this experience for anything. Y'know sometimes my class feels like one big family other than my own. It's a very nice & warm feeling when we get along & share experiences.
I completely agree with point C, because in my opinion school is a place for more than just learning academics. It is a place where you most importantly socialise. Especially in todays society getting amongst other people you share interests with and talking about how you feel about different situations. I firmly believe there is way more important activities than just learning information in school, things that can not be teached by teachers but that pupils have to learn on their own such as failures and firendships. Those are such simple but essential parts of our lives we learn to develop while still going to school and in my opinion that is one of few points that make school more enjoyable and helps you through your day!! We have to go through this, our parents already did and our kids one day will also have to experience such type of environment to grow their character and also to mature.
I disagree with Option A.. because while machines can process information efficiently, they might struggle to understand human emotions. School isn't just about gaining knowledge it's a place where we develop important interpersonal skills, learn to work together and to master social interactions. Until machines do understand the importance of forming lasting friendships, and appreciating the value of personal growth, there remains an important role for humans in the educational system.
I strongly agree with opinion C, because school doesn't only help with learning, it is a place where people of diverse cultures and backgrounds meet to interact and adapt to each other. Schools helps break language barriers and provide the medium to harness basic soft skills as well as supporting each other emotionally. Machines cannot help you achieve this.
I agree with opinion B because AI devices can't help with Emotional Intelligence, adaptability to environment so we need to go to school to learn those stuff.
AI devices are all functioned in different ways. Some are to help us
I agree with A because in this generation we use machines for a lot of work. Schools are currently learning robotics and STEM in order learn to create machines. The main point of learning is to get a great job in the future. So what's the point of learning when the machines can learn and can work for us.
I disagree because, while yes we use machines a lot for work, we should not be dependent on them. Expectually when machines can be easily made to replace us within our jobs if we aren't properly educated. Imagine this, you've never gotten an education to make your own decisions, you try to get a job, and then you get rejected due to the lack of education. You'll get your place in the job taken by a robot who had the knowledge to take the job. Another example of something going wrong when depending on machines is if you're in an area without mechanics to help you find your way or to help you with a scientific problem. You'll need to learn how to get out of that problem, wouldn't you? You would need to know how to do things on your own, which you could have gotten if you weren't dependent on machines to do your work and do your learning. While yes you're correct about the School's STEM teaching students how to create machines, we shouldn't use it to just discard the valuable information that we can gain just because AI and machines can do it for us.
I strongly agree with the option C because School is not just about learning information because it also gives us the opportunities for social interaction, personal growth, and the development of critical thinking skills. AI, while incredibly powerful and capable of processing large amounts of information, lack the ability to fully replicate these part of the learning experience. Social interaction allows students to learn how to work with others, develop empathy, and build relationships. Personal growth involves discovering one's passions, interests, and values, which cannot be easily taught by machines. Critical thinking skills, such as problem-solving and creativity, are essential for navigating complex real-world situations and are best developed through interactive and dynamic learning environments that schools provide. That is why “School is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with.”
I agree with option C because there are many things that AI can't help us with. Although it is a very intelligent technology and can do numerous things for us to make our lives easier, it still lacks creativity, originality as well as emotional intelligence. We humans are social creatures. We have family and friends with whom we spend time connecting emotionally. And this is something that school teaches us. School isn't all about studies, it's also about learning our basic morals, learning to connect emotionally with people and developing our personality. This is something that can't be achieved with AI. Therefore, AI can replace humans in many sectors, but it still can't replace school.
Hi,
I agree with opinion B because people will continue to learn with or without machine intelligence. If human beings stopped learning, we'd become mindless creatures who would rely on artificial intelligence to do things for us. However, in order to create AI, humans would have to be smart enough to make them. Just because they may have mechanical brains doesn't mean that they can do a lot on their own. The human brain, no matter how much you know, is a computer with room to grow and learn. No artificial intelligence can come close to it. Therefore, humans will continue to learn even if machines are intelligent too.
I will never agree with point A because while machines can assist in learning and provide valuable resources, attending school offers more than just knowledge acquisition. It fosters social skills, critical thinking, and practical experiences that machines cannot replicate. Human interaction, guidance from teachers, and hands-on learning contribute to a well rounded education that goes beyond what machines can provide.
I think I agree with Opininion C, because even though AI is becoming more clever and some claim that as a result, we might no longer require education, I don't think so.
There is more to education than memorizing data and facts. It's where we learn important abilities like critical thinking, morality, and interpersonal relationships. Artificial intelligence is capable of certain tasks, but it lacks human creativity and emotional intelligence.
Technology also changes quickly. Attending school keeps us knowledgeable and prepared for life's challenges. Even if AI is great for some things, it can't take the place of human abilities like creativity and social intelligence, for example.
Overall, it appears that both AI and education are still necessary. While AI is helpful with certain tasks, education teaches us the essential human skills.
We agree with point B because everyone has different learning style which AI bots may not be able to adapt to. For example, many people have to use physical items to support their learning. As it it is physical and not digital, the AI bot would not be able to provide this support so many people would struggle to learn the skills they need. Furthermore, robots cannot teach you the skills needed to communicate with other people, the skills you learn from friendship groups. There is an important social aspect to school and education.
I agree with the opinion that 'People need to learn for themselves even if machines are intelligent too'. Learning is not only about acquiring information, but also about developing our own opinions, values and perspectives. Machines may be able to process data faster and more accurately than humans, but they cannot replace human curiosity, creativity, and empathy that drive learning. Learning for ourselves is what makes us unique and helps us grow as individuals in the society. However, both humans and machines can learn from each other and collaborate to solve problems.
Hey, I absolutely agree with point C. In present days information has become readily available with the help of technology but school offers essential experiences that go far beyond simply acquiring facts. Schools provide opportunities to develop critical thinking, problem solving skill, social skills, and creativity. School provides a safe space for students to interact with peers from diverse backgrounds, build friendship, and learn empathy. While, machines may offer some social connection but lacks the nuance and human connection. Schools offer a variety of experiences and subjects that help students to explore their interests, discover passion, and develop self identity. Overall, while technology plays a valuable role in education, it cannot replace the unique and irreplaceable benefits of human created learning environment.
I think that jobs will exist in the future,
as they could still educate children as even though there will be AI thay still need to be educated for when thay are older and they cant just rely on AI for a living.
I agree with opinion C because it is true that machines cant help us with somethings that human teachers can.
In my opinion I am inbetween B and C. AI has alot of potential but, like said in sentence C AI can't help us with everything including how they don't have a consciousness of right and wrong and cannot respond to our emotional needs. Just because AI might become smarter by learning from human intelligence doesn't mean we can lie down, relax and be lazy, we also have to learn and experience things for ourselves and for our health.
I strongly disagree with reason A because if we let AI do everything for us we will become lazy. As well as this, teachers, school janitors and school cooks will be out of a job and without money. Once students finish school they will need to be able to man AI. AI is supposed to help us, not replace us, therefore we will need to know how to control it safely.
I agree with opinion C. School is more than a place for learning and studying. Teachers in school help enrich students' analytical skills and give emotional support and that's something a computer cannot do. School with teachers helps with students' collaboration and communicating skills and AI cannot do that.
I firmly agree that humans are accustomed to school and it is substantially inexhaustible . Meaning that mostly, humans might spend 1/5 of humans life in school including achieving degrees and doctorates. This amount of years can't be just taken away in a blink of an eye . AI might reduces the amount of time by a few years but it wouldn't be gone completely because it an important factor in a human's life . AI could even ameliorate school by creating more option for student with learning disabilities.
I choose option B. I am of the opinion that, people can always learn by staying home, read books and have total understanding of them. When people read novels and story books, they learn new words from the story and know their meaning, everything has gone digital that you don’t need to ask a teacher the meaning of every new word but rather surf online for the meanings. Even with pronunciation, humans can learn to correctly pronounce words with hi tech apps that seem like you are interacting with a real person on the other end. It is an undeniable fact that machines are better, but as humans, can learn by ourselves. But there are many disadvantages of stopping the physical educational pattern and substituting them with machines which could lead to over dependence. In addition businesses cannot run perfectly if we solely depend on robots to do everything for us. If robots are doing the work, where will our breadwinner get the income to care for their families? It has been speculated that in few years to come, robots may take control over the "white collar” jobs. The question on my mind now is that, what then will become of humans if we can’t be productive and take care of ourselves.
This is an interesting concern, mirthful_flight. Experts believe that AI will create more jobs - can you think what kind of jobs these might be?
Hi Molly,
Regarding the kind of jobs that could be created through Artificial intelligence, I would say that whether we like it or not, AI has come to stay, so even if we aren't totally cool with it, we definitely have to look for means to incorporate them in most of our activities. Here are some jobs that I think might be created in no distant time;
1. Minning jobs: this is even a safer way of harnessing resources. Staying around a place that is deposited with natural resources, I often have heard stories about people who went to mine Tin and some other precious stones, that never made it back home because of the risk associated with the job. If AI is being used, it will reduce the time most minners will use to find the sites and then start digging.
2. Surgery: I know this might sound lame, but I feel that AI could substitute the 'trial and error' phase that some patients pass through. Imagine having a machine that can immediately detect the affected areas that need surgery in the human body and then act like a scanner that will guide the surgeon to operate on that particular spot. It will make the job a lot more easier and safer.
3. Security and opening doors: with AI, people will no longer be door men at organizations. These programmed machines could open the doors and even welcome the guest. They could automatically scan the visitor to be sure if they aren't coming into the premises with prohibited items. It will actually make that area covered with much ease.
I am agree on the importance of Al . AI or Artificial intelligence is a part of future technology. It will be also helpful for study on future. We can study on online by using AI technology. In the future we will be able to make a internet connection for study . We will be learn many things on online classes. It will be help us to add on classes in any where of world . It will be help us to continue our lessons on any natural disaster like Coved-19 . So, if we implementation AI , school will be not so important for study . But, school is important for learning good behavior. So , everybody can say that AI and school both are so important for our future .
Thanks for sharing your opinion, storytelling_crab. Of the three opinions in the post above, which do you most agree with and why?
Hi, Molly.
Thanks for replying in my comment .
I'm so late . Because, I couldn't decide whether I would give more importance to school or AI . After much thought I decided that AI- Artificial intelligence would be a bit more important than school. If, Al can control an entire school . If, Al can also control a whole company. Then, we can make a online company. If we can make it, we can save our money and time too . So, I think that Al is more than important school . Thanks.
But, I have a question; 1) Is Al enough to fight corruption ?
Teachers are a great resource to help in lessons and outside of class. teachers can direct us to AI support but this is in addition to teachers, not a replacement.
I agree with opinion B. This is because there will always be things that AI cannot provide full assistance with. For example, building a house. Although AI can tell you the directions and materials required to build a house, it cannot physically build one (if we are not accounting for AI-powered robots). This is especially true for socialization since the less a human socializes, the less they know how to, and AI cannot particularly help in this area. I found that when I talk with AI, I do not take into account any of their feelings because they cannot feel raw human emotions, which often ends up in me not knowing how to sympathize with my peers.
I like your point about how you talk to AI differently because you know it can't feel emotions. How do you think the increase in popularity of AI will effect the ways that humans communicate with each other?
Good day everyone,
I would love to answer this question, according to the 'Cornell university', the use of AI's in communication encourages use of positive emotional language, and positive evaluations by communication partners.
I disagree with this, and I have reasons why.
>Firstly, research has been proven that AI's do not have emotions, Which makes it a bit impossible for them to communicate the kind of message one might want to pass, for example: imagine someone wants to give an encouraging speech to orphans in the orphanage, Do you think an emotion less robot would able to give the speech and use strong and encouraging words as the human would? well, I don't think so, If you think so let me know why.
>Secondly, it makes a break in family communication, if people rely on too much, that would be bad because it can be hacked, and used to take advantage of the over dependent person, it will make families not to communicate as much why, because everyone just want to get opinions from robot that has no humanly feelings, forgetting that sometimes the robot might be wrong.
Nothing breaks a relationship like lake of good communication. My main point is why allow a machine to break a relationship that took years to build.
>Decrease in face-to-face interactions, which is a big disadvantage to our social skills and emotional intelligence,the AI's have the ability to spread misinformation, impact public opinions which encourages social dynamics. It has almost succeeded in altering human interactions.
I hope my reasons have been well proposed.
I think the increase in the popularity of AI will negatively affect the ways that humans communicate with each other by isolating emotions. Most AI I have chatted with seem to have the same type of mindset (or model), therefore leading to a lack of diverse thinking. If humans mainly rely on AI communication, they will soon be accustomed to it and likely not anything else, leading to a tremendous gap in their socialization skills.
I completely agree with opinion C “School is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with.” because machines like computers and AI can provide vast amounts of data and information, there are essential aspects of learning that are uniquely human and go beyond what machines can offer. Firstly social skills , school provide a structured environment for students to interact, collaborate, and develop social skills that are essential for personal and professional success. Secondly emotion ,as we all have knowledge emotion is the thing that make us human unique from other animal. Understanding and managing emotions, and interpersonal relationships are crucial aspects of emotional intelligence. These skills are vital for personal development, forming connections with others, and navigating various social situations. Lastly experience , school gives us various experience for well and successful life.
I totally agree the terms A and B but in my pov like nowadays education will always play a crucial role in the future too,even if Ai advances it can't take place of human beings cause human beingsmade Ai it isn't viceversa. Technology may change the way we learn but schools will still be important for providing a structured environment and stimulated social interaction
I completely disagree with opinion A, as machine's or AI's work is to make our lives efficient, it does not mean that we stop learning new things and we totally depend on AI. At present we don't know whether AI in future turn out to be threatening or very helpful. Many movies, TV shows and other reports, sometimes predicts that AI would be the worst mistake of human race. So, it is significant for us to be independent of AI and use AI in a safe manner.
Additionally, if humans in this era, finish learning and finish updating themselves with the latest things, they may feel that they are living too far from the normal world. Therefore, if we talk about future, a human's necessity would be AI, which was before a home and meal. And, learning might have became a "machine" thing and not a human's thing. If humans still understand the importance of knowledge, importance of human brain and the correct usage of AI, AI would transpire the best thing the world has ever had in the entire history.
I choose option B because people can learn by themselves. We always don't need to ask teachers for help. We can learn new words and meaning from book or novel. We can get many knowledge and information from reading a book. If we have any confusion, we can ask tech apps. But the main thing is that we should not always rely on robots or ai. It might make us lazy. All the work will be done by robots instead of us and we also can't make income if robots are doing the work.
With this saying, I was guessing, "What will happen to people if they cannot be capable and productive to do something?"
In my POV' Education will continue to play a vital role in the future, even if AI advances because technology may change the way we learn but schools will still be important to us for providing a structured environment and stimulated social interaction as well as making earth a better place to live. So,even though Ai provides learning opportunities it will never take place of the teachers,school especially humans.
I agree with opinion B, as there are certain tasks and experiences that AI cannot fully replicate or assist with. For instance, while AI can provide instructions and information on building a house, it cannot physically construct one itself (assuming we are not talking about AI-powered robots). Furthermore, socialization is an area where AI has limitations. If humans rely too much on AI for social interactions, they may lose the ability to socialize effectively with other humans.
I strongly agree with option B in an ever-evolving world, the necessity for individuals to continuously learn and grow remains constant, regardless of the advancements in artificial intelligence. While machines may possess intelligence, the innate human desire to acquire knowledge and expand one's understanding cannot be replaced. The human capacity for critical thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence allows us to delve deeper into complex subjects, adapt to new challenges, and make connections that machines simply cannot replicate. Therefore, even in a world where machines are intelligent, the inherent need for personal learning and growth will always persist.
I would love to hear your thoughts about my choice
Thank You..
I strongly disagree with option A,From my perspective, machines replacing human education fail to account for the fundamental aspects of personal development, critical thinking, and social interaction that traditional schooling fosters .while AI technology has made remarkable strides, social intelligence and practical experience remain crucial for effective performance in many situations. As a result, machines may not possess the same level of social interaction as humans, which could limit their capacity to achieve specific objectives and potentially decrease overall efficiency..
If you agree I would love to hear your perspective..
I absolutely agree with opinion B.
Indeed, personal learning remains essential even in a world with intelligent machines .
Human engagement and understanding are valuable aspects of learning experience that machines may not fully replace.
I resonate with opinion C because school - although an environment designed for learning, is still a hubbub of young and curious minds waiting to explore their strengths and skills, find new ones and do all those things with other people.
On of the problems that AI can present is a lack of physical communication which is almost essential to the human life. Sure there is online communication but it’s just not the same. Just look at Covid.
I also agree with opinion D because although AI only advancing in intelligence we are the ones behind it - yes us humans! Laying back and not going to school will greatly disrupt this advancement and if care is not taken years of progress can all go down the drain. So to continue this development we must first develop ourselves - the masters.
I agree with opinion C, because schools aren't there to just teach us about things like maths and science but how to be people. They teach us key life skills, such as compassion and empathy, that we wouldn't be able to find anywhere else, they also allow us to socialise with new people and make friends that may last a lifetime. Schools teach us how to deal with both our failures and successes in a positive way and they help us see everything as a learning experience that we wouldn't have the opportunity to do without it. If we didn't have school to teach us about these basic life skills then as a world we would be set back to where we were before with only certain people going to school. For some school is a space away from home where they can forget about everything else going on in their lives and just learn and have fun with their friends. This emotional and social maturity we learn at school simply couldn't be learnt anywhere else and AI wouldn't be able to have these skills or teach humans these abilities.
I strongly agree with the option that states that school is not just about learning information. It’s important for things that machines can’t help with. When we go to school, we don't just learn, we meet and build relationships with people . We also discover the type of person we are and how we react to different situations . We also create fun memories and events which brings us joy when we recall those moments in the future , which machine can never do for us.
Hello everyone,
Let’s say you’re sitting in the driver’s seat, with all the gear changes, accelerator settings, clutch settings, brake settings, and so on, but you don’t know how to drive. That’s pretty dumb, right?
Well, that’s the situation you’ll be in unless you learn by yourself, for yourself. You’ll know the technology exists, but you won’t be able to benefit from it because you’ll not know how the algorithms and concepts work. So yes, technology is changing, and learning should change with it.
Education is and will remain important for our personality and intellectual development.
I'm picking up what your putting down here but I feel this comment didn't really specify which option it is you were talking about.
I strongly agree with option c as schools are not just there to educate and make us learn things. They serve other purposes too for eg schools build the personality and the character of the child. They help us develop social understanding and skills required in our day-to-day life. They help us in gaining new experiences and making friends. I think schools play a very important role in shaping the child and determining their future. All of this couldn't be achieved with the help of machines. From waking up early in the morning to coming back home and doing our homework, schools teach us a lot of things that we don't even realise. Simply sitting at home and learning through machines is far different from actually going to school. I believe machines can never actually replace offline schools even in the long run.
yes, school might not exist in the future because of AI, that is why we should try as much as possible to prevent that from happening, how do u think the world would be without going to school and just depending on robots to do everything for you, there would be too much laziness and besides laying in bed all day is not good for our health, our body needs exercise and fresh oxygen in the open world. but i agree that AI might take over some jobs but it can never take over the jobs of our lovely teachers, but let me confess, AI actually helps us with a assignments i mean it good to do researches right? what am trying to point out is that schools will surely exist in the future but there would be less stress and fatigue.
There’s no point going to school if the machines can do the learning for us !
Can you explain why you agree with this opinion, inspired_lake?
HELLO!
I disagree because if AI does the learning for us it would not be able to transfer its knowledge to our brains, moreover, if AI learns it would just continue to evolve, which would mean humans will not learn anything.
THANK YOU!
In response to question A, I would like to express my respectful disagreement. I believe that stating education is futile because machines can learn on our behalf is a flawed argument. While it is true that artificial intelligence can assist us in our learning endeavors, it is important to understand that machines can only perform tasks that they have been programmed to do. They cannot think or reason like humans, nor can they make decisions based on empathy or emotions. Therefore, humans must continue to acquire knowledge and skills through traditional educational methods, such as attending schools, colleges, and universities, to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills that are essential for personal and professional growth.
Moreover, it is crucial to understand that the key to progress lies in collaborating with machines, rather than relying solely on their abilities. Human creativity, innovation, and intuition are irreplaceable, and machines can only augment our abilities, not replace them. Thus, we should focus on using artificial intelligence to enhance our skills and knowledge, rather than replacing them. By doing so, we can create a symbiotic relationship between humans and machines, where both parties can benefit from each other's strengths and weaknesses.
I strongly agree with B for people will need to learn even if machines are intelligent.
I personally feel that education would be on a higher scale and the children along with the world would prosper as to develop AI applications educated personnel would be required. This is my view but we can never be completely certain of the future.
I believe that schools are an absolute necessity even in a world where robots can do everything, because schools aren’t just about books and information it’s also about developing other skills like interacting with new people or building confidence, and even if this wasn’t the case we are the ones to create AI so how can it replace us? We need to keep learning to improve.
I belive that schools will exist in the future. It is very important for everyone to be sure to have education.
I disagree with section A because school is a place where students can both learn and build relationships. Schools are there for students to learn and open their minds to new ideas. If student do not go schools how will have the ideas to create new devices , apps and even more advanced AI . Yes AI help us with studies and research but AI doing the learning for us means us refusing to study and advance.
I disagree with opinion A. I disagree because how are you going to learn from robots?! Robots have no emotions and no imagination.Since they have neither of those they wouldn't be very good teachers.Teachers normally have emotions and imagination.If your teacher doesn't have emotions and imagination they would make learning something VERY boring.So I respectfully disagree with opinion A.
AI can create art, music and videos. It can also generate ideas for games and stories. Does this change your mind about anything?
The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various aspects of human creativity, including art, music, videos, and even idea generation for games and stories. This essay explores the impact of AI in these creative domains and examines whether this transformative capability has the potential to change our perspectives.
AI and Creative Expression:
AI technologies have demonstrated remarkable abilities in generating artistic works, composing music, and creating videos. Through sophisticated algorithms and machine learning techniques, AI systems can analyze vast amounts of data and generate original pieces that mimic human creativity. This has led to the production of stunning artworks, captivating music compositions, and visually appealing videos that would have been unimaginable without AI.
Expanding Possibilities:
The ability of AI to generate ideas for games and stories has expanded the possibilities for creative endeavors. By analyzing existing content and patterns, AI algorithms can generate fresh concepts and storylines, providing inspiration to human creators. This collaboration between AI and humans has the potential to unlock new realms of imagination and creativity, pushing the boundaries of what we thought was possible.
Challenging Perceptions:
The emergence of AI as a creative force challenges traditional notions of human exceptionalism. It prompts us to reconsider the belief that creativity is solely a human trait. AI's ability to generate art, music, and ideas challenges our preconceived notions about the uniqueness of human creativity. It forces us to confront the idea that creativity can be algorithmically replicated and raises questions about the essence and value of human creativity.
The Human Element:
While AI can generate impressive works, it is essential to recognize the role of human creators in the process. AI systems are tools that require human input, guidance, and interpretation. Human creativity is imbued with emotions, experiences, and the ability to connect with others on a deeply personal level. These aspects of human creativity cannot be replicated by AI alone.
Collaborative Potential:
Rather than replacing human creativity, AI has the potential to enhance and amplify it. By leveraging AI's capabilities, creators can explore new ideas, experiment with different styles, and gain insights that may have been overlooked. AI can serve as a tool for inspiration, providing novel perspectives and sparking innovative approaches to creative endeavors.
Conclusion:
The creative power of AI in generating art, music, videos, and ideas for games and stories is undeniable. While AI's capabilities challenge our perceptions about human creativity, it is important to remember that human creators play a vital role in shaping and infusing meaning into these creations.
I strongly agree with b because even if machines are smarter we still have to learn because we wont ask AI for everything we do like cooking recipes,homework,or any other thing we still have to learn.
this response is agreeable because it may be short but its putting the basics out there, because we wont use AI for everything, Schools with hopeful still exist in the future because I wouldn't want a robot for a teacher.
I agree with option B because of our current situation states that AI is trying taking over the majority of jobs which makes it less relevant for humans to study and work, because people who don't have access to education need to learn and socalise and learn manual jobs such as tailoring etc but with AI this makes it less relevant to learn and work and makes it harder to make a living even if AI , and as option B states we still need to learn even though AI is very intelligent and as we are adapting to it and if we follow what option B says with the release of AI we could survive the future even if AI is trying its to take a stand, we will survive it, it is just like too much reliability on phones which is bad for you this is the same as too much reliability on AI the human race are survivors learners, resolvers of problems independent reliant on their kind so just as our ancestors survived without technology and AI, we as humans are self-reliant so even with the start of AI and the rising of AI we shall be self-reliant so option B means it needs us to be independent even though we rely upon on AI we need to learn no matter what, to learn the past, future and present. we need basic human survival skills, intelligence like how to make food and fix clothes this is what makes us social and creative and intelligent evolvers
I strongly agree with opinion C, as information can be learnt even just by books and internet content like YouTube videos and can even be collected by AI machines or softwares. But school is a platform, where we learn various skills that are necessary in our practical life; such as communication and leadership skills. We learn to make new friends, to adapt in any kind of situation, to work together with people of different mindsets, and above all; to be a better person in life. Hence, school helps in our overall development, and is not for only providing information to us and making us learn things. Hence, the opinion is justified.
I agree with A because people already did it in covid so it is likely for that to happen!
I agree with opinion C this is because school is also a place where you get to mix and interact with people of different race, color and background and when mix and interact with these people you learn certain things from them whether good or bad that's why there's a saying that bad company corrupt good manners this is because us human beings tend to pick up certain behaviors from other people around us and also school also teaches us some very important values and morals that can and will help in the future.
I strongly agree with opinion c and the fact that going to school is much more than going to learn and gather information. School is a place where students go and learn not only about subjects but about themselves, in school we learn about personal skills and how to relate with others and and we learn to tolerate other people's views. I believe that the skills that are learnt from socializing in school are skills that would help us in the future, because we cannot learn time management and critical thinking sitting behind a book all day
These are my personal opinions
Thank you
I agree with the statement B. I agree with it as just because machines are smart doesn't mean we can't be smart to. Even though machines are smart we still have to learn for ourselves. I mean you cant just go walking around with a machine so it can do everything for you. No we have to do it ourselves. Even tho technology is a big thing right now doesn't mean we should stop going to school. We still need to get the education we need which will guarantee to help us in the future. Say if you have to go take a test , and you are not allowed to take any piece of technology with you. You will not know anything as you are always using a machine to do it for you. This is why we have to learn anyways. They may be introducing this new technology now but maybe later they will banned it. then what will you do. Because it will be too late to learn everything you could have done instead of using a machine. This is why even though there is all this cool technology we still have to learn as AI isnt created to be our slaves but to help us.
I agree with opinion B
There's a very popular saying "experience is the best teacher"
Personally I feel like we humans learn from experience and our past mistakes we never really listen to people when they give us advice about or on what they went through in that particular moment in their life till we really experience it and make our mistakes before we can learn from it there's also a saying that you must make mistakes before you can go far in life because we learn and grow from our mistakes we can,will and be able to learn for ourselves we have a min of our own.
I disagree with the statement that there is no point in going to school when machines can do the learning for us. First of all, machines cannot replace human creativity, curiosity, and critical thinking, which are essential skills for solving real-world problems and innovating new solutions. Second, machines cannot teach us the values of empathy, diversity, and collaboration, which are important for building positive relationships and fostering social harmony. Third, machines cannot inspire us to pursue our passions, interests, and goals, which are the sources of our happiness and fulfillment. Therefore, I believe that going to school is still very important and beneficial for us, even if machines can do some of the learning for us. It is a common misconception that machines can replace the role of schools in education. H However, the truth is machines can only supplement the learning process. Schools provide a holistic learning experience that goes beyond just acquiring knowledge. They provide a platform for students to interact with their peers, learn social skills, and develop critical thinking abilities. Moreover, schools provide a structured environment that helps students stay motivated and focused on their goals this cannot be replaced. Machines, on the other hand, can only provide a limited learning experience. They can help students acquire knowledge, but they cannot teach them how to apply that knowledge in real-life situations. They cannot provide the same level of personalized attention that a teacher can provide. They cannot help students develop social skills or learn how to work in a team. In conclusion, there is no substitute for the role of schools in education.
Some experts have argued that AI might actually make learning more personalised. Can you think of how?
AI might make learning more personalized by using data and algorithms to tailor the learning experience to each student's needs, interest and goals. For example, AI can provide adaptive learning content that adjusts students understanding level, pace and preferences, they offer intelligent tutoring systems that give individualized feedback, guidance and practice exercises to increase students' efficiency personally. In addition, the AI has generated personalized recommendations for learning resources such as books, articles etc. that match students interests and goals. It also uses natural language processing to create interactive chatbots and virtual assistants that can answer questions, provide explanations and engage in conversation with students or students. So yes, AI can personalize learning and make it more engaging, progressive, relevant and effective for every student.
I disagree with opinion C because although school is not just for learning information that is the main point of going to school. Lots of people say school is used to intensity our soft skills and global perspectives skills. But no parent will take their children to school, pay expensive school fees and say, "I am taking my children to school because I want their soft skills to be enhanced." They will not take their children to school just to learn soft skills. These skills are not necessarily learnt in school. Meaning you do not have to go to school to learn these skills. You can even learn them when playing games with a partner.
Yes . But it will be more Certainly! Schools are an important part of our society and will continue to be in the future. However, the methods and formats of education may evolve and adapt to better fit the needs of students and society. Technology and advances in communication may allow for more personalized and flexible learning opportunities. But rest assured, education will always be a vital aspect of personal and societal development. Yes, technology is certainly changing our world, including the field of education. With the emergence of digital devices and online resources, the future of education may see a shift towards more digital platforms. This could include more online learning opportunities, virtual classrooms, and AI-powered educational tools. Technology can also make learning more interactive and engaging by offering personalized and interactive learning experiences through simulation, games or interactive eBooks.
In addition to this, it has become more apparent in the recent years that education needs to adapt to the challenges of the modern world. This includes new technologies, global interconnectedness, and rapidly changing job markets. Many educational institutions are already shifting towards a more skills-based education with an emphasis on critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills. This is of great importance as these skills will be of increasing value in the workforce of the future.
In summary, the future of education will likely see a combination of traditional and modern elements. The traditional aspects of schooling such as peer interaction and guidance from teachers would still be core to the educational experience. Meanwhile, technology will provide additional tools and methods that will enable educators and students to navigate and thrive in knowledge-based societies.
I agree because... Technology and AI will certainly help in making learning better but it cannot fully replace teachers and schools. AI replacing teachers fully will stop students from having face-to-face interactions with teachers which is really important. Technology nowadays is advancing at a rapid rate and people think AI can do everything.
It has been proven that students learn better when they are taught and corrected with love. These are emotions which AI cannot portray. I really don't think that AI can teach with love or compassion. The best teacher is the one who teaches with love. Yes, I agree that AI can teach a lot of things but the emotions and impressions teachers give their students influence the student's ability to learn. When it comes to the teaching, a teacher's compassion will shine through in their actions and the way they behave toward their students. AI can bring passion to their instructional materials by teaching properly and yet have no effect on the students, but a teacher who has compassion and empathy can transform their classroom. Teachers should bring joy, passion, and love to the school. A loving teachers bring a unique spark to the classroom that can ignite a love of learning and improve a student’s relationship with knowledge and learning. AI can help improve teaching, but to completely replace teachers? I highly doubt this is something AI can do.
I strongly disagree with the first option, my reasoning for this is because this comment is suggesting that A.I is already fully equipped with everything needed for us as people to live our everyday lives without a care in the world and this is clearly not the situation we are in.For example what will happen 20-30 years down the line when all we have are pampered low iq adults that never went to school to lead not just the country but everyone in it?Like imagine having a president that gets all his information from a device in his pocket, If everyone started not going to school the world would fall apart.Think about it this way if this crazy Idea ever did manage to happen whats going to happen when everyone on the earth that did go to school is dead and gone and the earth is going through a crisis would you want someone that went to school and got a full education to help with the problem or some random guy that's had his phone to fix all his problems for him?
I strongly agree with opinion B because it is a crucial necessity for humans to learn. Schools help humans learn about themselves, Earth and, situations in which AI's can't help. Humans would need social skills, communication skills, emotional skills and much more to survive.AI can be useful for multiple things, but without AI how would humans be able to survive without it? What if you were stranded in the middle of nowhere without wifi or AI around you. You would have no clue of what to do. That's why it is important to learn even if AI can be helpful at times.
I love the choice of wording.
I really agree with option C, also option B. We do have to have some knowledge for ourselves. Even if machines are smart and can do many things, they are meant to help us humans to do things. People could say that there is many methods to learning instead of going to school, like education from home or things like that, but I think that school is a place for much more than just for learning. For example, it is a place where kids get to socialize, where they get to put their social skills to work. If school is not a thing in the future anymore, kids will stay at home a lot, and staying at home takes away children's desire to socialize, to talk to people other than their family. Not putting their social skills to work could also increase their anxiety and fear when talking to strangers, or just other people, when they have too.
I fully agree with opinion C because schools give students various skills to learn from, not just academic knowledge. With AI taking over learning districts, school will just be about intellectuality and not about how to interact and socialize with others. Schools would turn systematic and students would be slaves to education, the fun in meeting your friends everyday and talking about different things would be wiped out completely. Talking to a robot daily would minimize the amount of communication being practiced by students and, at a certain point, anti-socialism would be common among scholars. With machines becoming the source of education to humans, the world would go into individualism and solitude. Hence why schools organized by human beings with life experience, is the best option when it comes to deciding the future of schools.
I personally strongly disagree with option A. This is due to the fact that, even if machines are doing the learning for you, it's still beneficial for you to learn on your own. Learning on your own will make you less dependent on machines and would make you able to make better decisions. Many times machines can cause you to make decisions that may be good for you or may make you regret what you did. Learning on your own can also allow you to make decisions and think of what to do in certain situations where there are no machines to help you. If you don't learn of what to do when facing these problems, you be stuck without anyway to get out. While yes, Machines are very helpful, I would have to say I agree more with option B and C than option A. As those two options show that people should have more responsibility for their education than just relying on AI for answers to every situation.
I strongly agree with opinion B. The use of AI every time help is needed will leave everyone dependent on AI, which will have a negative impact on society. I strongly agree with option B because people must learn different topics and subjects themselves because if people become fully dependent on AI, when they are in a situation in which they don't have AI or AI isn't able to assist them, they would struggle. I also strongly agree because AI is not able to help with everything and certainly will not guide people their whole life. People must become independent as they should not depend on AI or a robot to guide them through their whole life. Additionally, AI is not able to learn as quickly as humans can, AI may take longer to learn compared to humans.
I strongly agree with opinion B because people also learn from real world experiences. If AI just taught us people we would become lazy and it would be harder for people to learn. The reason why people will always need to learn from themselves is because it allows you to take ownership and develop a paste of your own. While AI can teach us a lot we still need someone to operate the robot. Even though AI can teach people a lot we still have to learn certain things like how to read and write.
I strongly agree with opinion C. With machinery doing everything that will leave humanity for nothing else to do.In the next 300 years when it's time to adapt to the new living conditions no one will be able able to know how to do not a single thing because machinery has done it all for them. This will result in the human race going extinct because no one knows how to do anything for themselves.
Im totally on board with Opinion C: "School is not just about learning information. Its important for things that machines can’t help with."
See its not just about memorizing facts its about developing skills like critical thinking, problem solving and working together. Sure machines can crunch numbers and store information but can they truly navigate the complexity of human emotions or come up with innovative solutions to real world problems? Not really.
But here's the thing that really hits home for me the human touch no matter how smart machines get they cant replace the connections we make with each other. the discussions, the debates, the friendships you cant replicate that with a bunch of algorithms School is where we learn not just from books but from each other and thats irreplaceable.
So even in a world where AI is making waves theres still a crucial role for schools. We need to develop around people not just machines. Whats your take on this?
A is highly incorrect, simply because there has to be someone to put information into the AI. Humans still need basic skills like learning to read, write , and speak , as well as basic math. AI can't do everything for humans. This is why our generation is chronically lazy. So, I think I really agree with C the most part. For B I also agree, we need to be able to carry out basic functions alongside AI. In short C and B are the most realistic about AI and should be implemented as we lean more towards AI.
Hello everyone!
I strongly agree with the option C because School is not only about acquiring knowledge and information, but it also plays a vital role in developing various skills and qualities that machines cannot replicate. Here are a few reasons why school is important beyond just learning information:
1. Social Skills: School provides an environment for students to interact with their friends , teachers, and other members of the community. This helps in developing social skills, such as teamwork, communication and empathy
2. Emotional Intelligence: School offers opportunities for students to understand and manage their emotions, as well as develop empathy and compassion towards others. These emotional intelligence skills are very important for building healthy relationships and navigating through life.
3. Critical Thinking: School encourages students to think critically, analyze information, and solve complex problems. This skill is essential in today's world, where the ability to evaluate and make informed decisions is highly valued.
4. Creativity and Imagination: Schools often encourage creativity and provide platforms for students to express themselves through art, music, drama, and other creative outlets. These activities help to bring up imagination and innovation, which are important for personal growth and societal progress.
5. Character Development: School helps shape the character and values of individuals. It promotes qualities like discipline, responsibility, integrity, and resilience, which are essential for personal and professional success.
6. Physical Development: Schools often provide opportunities for physical education and sports, promoting physical fitness and overall well-being. These activities contribute to a healthy lifestyle and teach important lessons about teamwork, sportsmanship, and difficulties.
While machines can assist in delivering information and facilitating learning, they cannot fully replace the physical, social, and psychological educational experience that schools provide. The human aspect of education, including social interaction, emotional development, critical thinking, creativity, character building, and physical activities, remains invaluable and essential for a well-rounded education.
Thank you !
I disagree with A because machines only help you understand and help you with questions. People are the answer because everybody has the information to the question. Sure AI has all answers in seconds but the brain power you can use and improve will be able to do the same as the machines get and understand the question in seconds. AI also can't really do things like humans because they are not fully functional at movement and neither humans have an error in the system with programming.AI can't also helps humans who have disabilities like special needs and many other disabilities. Ai also can't help with people who have PTSD,Social anxiety,Depression, or any other social or personal emotions. Humans are better than AI It's just that people who created AI have put every solution and Problem in their system. Still before AI humans were the people who had the possibility and chances to get the solution or problem. Humans have evolved ages since AI.
Once technology has advanced people won't be going to school anymore because there might be a chance that people import chips with the knowledge of the world into humans so they don't have to waste their lives learning.If that chance happens people will basically become Ai just in the human form. Without the chip humans are nothing so it shows that advancement is not always the solution to the people or the world. It can cause the earth to be polluted,damaged, and possibly destroyed.
I can see both sides on why AI can be both a positive and a negative thing. I agree with the negative side because although it can be useful when needed some people take advantage of this, for instance school, I'm sure in many schools people use AI like chat gpt, the new snapchat AI and whatever else is out on the internet to cheat their way in school so from my perspective I think this can make our generation pretty lazy. It also can cause a loss of jobs as we increase with technology and in this economy many people can't afford to lose their job.
However, AI can also be a good thing seeing as it has the potential to improve our lives and make our lives more convenient. In particular it can give assistance in transportation, education, healthcare such as diagnosis and treatments. It can also just be like a way to give advice or suggestions with everyday things such as restaurants, what to watch, music, and much more. With this no matter how we feel about it we need to use it responsibly and safely.
I agree with C because I believe that school teaches us a lot more things than technology can. At school kids learn to socialize and they work on their communication skills. I think that if school didn't exist and everyone was learning from a machine it would affect their mental health, I believe this cause they wouldn't be able to socialize the same way they do at school. I also think that learning wouldn't be as fun and kids wouldn't be able to express themselves in a creative way if they will be talking to a robot all day. They just wouldn't develop those same communication skills that they do when attending school.
I strongly disagree with opinion A because in my point of view machines are simply too accurate to facilitate learning , and if there is no scope for mistakes or failures Learning is not possible. And when we know that the machine would do the tasks for us we are simply dependent on something artificial. To me Learning is all about mistakes and experiences it is subjective and thus may not be accurate for everyone . AI can never replace schools , schools are not just buildings it is a place where we feel , react and then learn from our reaction . Social Learning through peers can never be replaced by AI .
I agree with option B because although AI can help us some of its work isn't always reliable. Machines will always have flaws, which is why nothing is 100% dependable. People should still learn for themselves because even though machines can help in almost anything if we rely on machines too much we will become lazy and dependent on them. Learning for themselves means that even when a machine fails to do an action, you would still be able to do it for yourself. AI, It's a good thing for the future, but people should still learn to be self-sustainable.
I strongly disagree with A because all the AI technology we have now were created by people who went to school-and that is one thing we tend to forget. If we stop going to school, there will be no one to make more advanced versions of AI and we will forever be stuck where we are now.
There is another argument people fall on, ''What if machines become teachers?'' School is not only about learning subjects like Math or English but it also helps with building Emotional Intelligence, Time management and Tolerance. AI is imbedded so much in our daily lives that we think they can do everything. But some things can only be done by humans.
With that being said, I will agree with C.
Hello everyone!
Actually there is no reason to close our schools because of AI. Because we can only know the technical aspects from AI. Robots have no emotions, and robots cannot understand human minds. And by going to school we can learn about social values. There is a joy in sharing whatever personal information or emotions we have with our teachers when we go to school. All those who create AI or work with AI must come from school. Even if AI comes with very advanced technology, going to school will not stop but a new curriculum will be created. Now in many countries of the world, AI has come a long way but it has not stopped in their schools. Schools in those countries are encouraged to work with AI, fostering creativity, working to make it technology-dependent.
The machine will teach us but the subject will be taught by the school teacher. If people do not learn, then who will make the machine intelligent? Who will catch the problems of the machine? Who will make the work schedule of the machine?
If you don't go to school, ideals, unity, religious values, social thinking, future plans, etc. will these machines learn?
Of course not.
I think the importance of schools will increase in future as compared to now.
Thank you.
If it were up to me, I would have prevented the school from disappearing, for several reasons, the first of which is that school helps the child develop his personality and ideas, through the dialogue that takes place between him and his friends or with teachers. If he makes a mistake in school, he learns better than if he makes a mistake in his social life, but this idea is unlikely to happen. Because public schools require very high funding, and the state of the country and economic conditions do not allow this. As for private schools, they may have funding capabilities, and this idea is not allowed because it is unfair at the educational level.
Hello,
I strongly agree with opinion B that states "People will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too." because although machines are intelligent by analyzing existing patterns, they do not have the ability to imagine and create new patterns. We humans have the ability to imagine and create new patterns because of what we have learned and that is one distinct feature humans have above machines. For example the existence of AI is from the imagination of human beings.
I believe that humans will always need to learn so as to continue to build our imagination and better our society in different ways just as it has with AI.
Greetings.
I am totally agreeing with the opinion A because in this present generation, AI is being more helpful for the students. It is created to help us; new things are existing now. AI can help us for learning purpose especially when it comes to large number of data and personal feedback. AI might be the perfect solution for the easiest learning. It helps us to answer all those puzzled questions, learn continuously and easily, to contrive newly things around us. There are lots of benefits we can get from AI. For example, we all know that CHATGPT helps us to do our assignments and clear our queries. Future is all about AI. AI algorithms can quickly evaluate student work and provide feedback that needs improvement. It mostly helps us in educational field.
Thank You.
Hi there!
I agree with option B. Absolutely, the role of human learning remains crucial, even in the presence of intelligent machines. While machines can process vast amounts of data and perform specific tasks efficiently, human learning involves creativity, critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and the ability to adapt to complex, dynamic situations. Humans bring a unique perspective, intuition, and ethical considerations to problem-solving that machines may not fully replicate. The synergy between human learning and AI can lead to more innovative and comprehensive solutions.
I agree we humans are very intelligent because we have a brain. We allowing machines to do all the thinking can make us lazy,we need to learn and do things for our selves because if robots or machines were not to be made it can lead to people not having jobs because people do not want to do work and this can lead to people going into theft and also can lead us to limiting our selves from what we can do. We have a brain more powerful than theirs if we just put our minds into learning. Although, they are more efficient than us, it doesn't change the fact that we are still humans and higher than them because we created them.
I disagree very much with opinion A. Why? Because we need to learn for ourselves. AI has been created to help us, not do our work, Look at it this way, In the future, you need to get a job, to earn money, but, if AI did all the work in school, or you didn't even have school, you wouldn't be hired, and you would end up without money. If school wasn't here, you wouldn't know a lot of stuff you know now, which will be very important in the future. So, what's the point? The point is if we don't have school, we wouldn't know as much as we know now If we didn't have school!
But, school isn't only about education purposes, no, no, no. We make friends at school, and sometimes, have lots of fun!
Thanks for reading!👋
Hello,
I would like to talk on the issue of stress on the teachers, there are so many reasons why AI's might be important to the aspect of education, the AI powered bots can make research for both the student and the teacher, I would make teaching a lot easier for teachers. Teachers around the world are using AI's to improve students' performance because of their exceptional ability to provide well organized in information for varieties of sources.
It is also improving the world of personalized learning, they help students out, in forming their own lessons, taking needed Quizes and helping to develop the student's interest in a specific aspect.
It helps to improve the performance of students who need special attention, some students are not able to understand when are being taught in large classes, some of them want special attention and because of stress some teachers are not able to give that to the students who desire it. So, in such case the student goes back to I AI's and he or she is able to learn better.
This is a very important advantage of the AI's in education, you see, AI's create opportunities for students to learn a lot more than their limited school curriculum, it allows us to make reseach on things that our teachers originally would not teach in class, e.g. trying to acquire a skill like sewing which no one would teach in the school, but AI's create that opportunity.
Another advantage is the Intelligent tutoring systems, they are systems that are built in, which help to give feedback on a student's performance and then give corrections int the aspects that it has spotted that the student needs help in. They take information from some experts in those fields and then put it in a way that the student would understand.
I hope I have been able to prove that the advantages of AI's cannot be over emphasized.
The thing is schools might not exist in the future, reason; nobody would want to pay a huge amount of money for school fees, while you can be "home schooled, home examined and home corrected".
I strongly agree with opinions B and C because I agree that AI will be able to teach students all the basics in school, For example, ELA, Math, Social Studies, and Science but, we need way more skills than just these for instantence human communication. Human communication is something that computers can not do like in many classrooms students have a variety of questions every day for their teachers and also create strong bonds with their teachers. But, if there were to be just AI teaching students would not be able to experience relationships with there teachers. You can also consider that teachers influence what kids want to be when they grow up. So, I can see where you're coming from thinking that AI can easily teach a class but now I hope you understand why that wouldn't be such a good idea.
I strongly agree with option B It's true that machines are getting smarter and smarter, but that doesn't mean we humans should stop learning. Learning is something that will always be important for us, no matter how intelligent machines become. We have our own unique abilities and experiences that machines can't replicate. Plus, learning helps us grow and develop as individuals. It allows us to explore new ideas, gain new skills, and understand the world around us better. So, even if machines become super intelligent, we should never stop learning because it's a fundamental part of being human.
please reply and share you thoughts
I have mixed opinion about AI taking over schools in the future. I agree that AI can be helpful by giving personalized learning and making education more efficient with virtual classes but also I disagree, saying that human teachers provide important things like emotional support and social skills that AI can't. While AI might make some things easier, it's very important to remember that teachers play a special role in helping students grow. AI should be seen as a tool to help teachers, not to replace them completely. I guess finding a balance between technology and the human touch is key for a good education system in the future.
The utilization of AI in education holds immense potential for enhancing the learning experience. By incorporating AI technologies into schools, students can benefit from personalized and adaptive learning, where AI algorithms can analyze individual strengths and weaknesses to tailor educational content accordingly. Moreover, AI can assist teachers in automating administrative tasks, allowing them to focus more on providing quality instruction and individualized support to students. Additionally, AI-powered virtual tutors and chatbots can offer immediate feedback and guidance, enabling students to receive assistance outside of the classroom. Ultimately, AI has the capability to revolutionize education by creating a more engaging, efficient, and inclusive learning environment.
I strongly agree with opinion B
people will always advocate for themselves even if machines are intelligent too, there are times when you seek for information from the internet but you still need to meet with an expert in the field to analyze it for simplifying and complexity.
Additionally, there are various types of intelligence and some individual possess exceptional teaching ability that greatly facilitate effective learning.
I agreed with opinion B. Because human mind has no limit in the field of innovation. And AI is also a result of human brain ideas. So we have to understand the importance of AI and human can put artificial intelligence to machines which would be helpful for him.
Do you think schools will still exist in the future? Personally, I believe that schools might not be around anymore. In the coming years, artificial intelligence (AI) could replace traditional schools and introduce virtual schooling with advanced AI and technology. However, relying on AI might discourage physical activity and make students lazy. Nevertheless, it's possible that schools could exist in a virtual world instead.
In my opinion, I agree because this can give you a high educational opportunity in life. This is a great thing because you can get good jobs and a better life. Also, they can provide us a lot of knowledge about the real world. But, its true that AI might make you lazy. So I think that schools and AI's should still exist . This can give people opportunities to choose which is good for your learning environment. This is because there are some bad things that can happen when AI's are teaching you. Plus, AI's wouldn't understand us that much like a regular human does. They won't understand our feelings and emotions.
I believe that probably in the future some educational systems will change due to artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence is probably better in some things that humans can't do, but I do not believe that school systems will be better with artificial intelligence. Machines may know better than humans but will a machine help me learn how to clean,work, or learn? No, because machines don't think beyond like a real human can.
I agree with opinion B, People cannot spend their whole lifetime making machines learn for them. Imagine you just gave birth; will you make your machine learn how to take care of your child for you? There are just some stuff humans just have to do them by themselves. We can't just make machines do all their work for us. What if all AI and machines malfunctioned how will people learn to take care of themselves because machines were learning for them.
We have to learn to do stuff for ourselves no matter how intelligent machines are.
It's critical to understand that attending school offers a setting for the development of extracurricular skills in addition to knowledge acquisition. As artificial intelligence advances, we might be able to anticipate more customized and adaptable learning environments. Schools also provide students with opportunities to interact with teachers and engage in experiential learning. While artificial intelligence (AI) can undoubtedly improve human learning, it cannot take the place of the special opportunities for learning and development that come with attending school.
Artificial intelligence has revolutionized the educational field by identifying individual learning patterns through data analysis, making education easier, fun and engaging. As a result, we may anticipate more personalized and adaptive learning experiences. Teachers can concentrate more on student connection by using AI to automate administrative work.
Ultimately, artificial intelligence (AI) has arrived to transform teaching and learning, not to takeover the educational sector. So therefore, even with the aid of a machine, education is still important.
I strongly agree with opinion c, on surface level it might appear to us that we go to school just to learn some information, pass an examination and get a good job in future but it doesn't end there. School help us develop skills that are important to us as humans for example it helps us connect with people and develop communication skills which helps us to learn networking an important skill to survive in the modern world, school also develop the habits of discipline, hard work and perseverance. These are essential building blocks for a human's growth and I am sure the humans who had developed AI also must have possessed these qualities which can only be learnt by attending school. Therefore in my opinions no matter what schools can't be replaced.
I strongly disagree with opinion A because e AI will not be able to transfer the knowledge he has learnt to our brain so humans have to go to school and learn for themselves AI will not be able to learn for humans. I strongly agree with opinion B.
I don't agree with option A because letting robots being the teacher will become very repetitive as if you had an actual teacher teaching you, you would have much more fun and enjoy your learning more and also if no one goes to school how will people learn to program to robot anyway? That is why I think that people should go to school even with the existence of AI
Thank you for that wonderful comment but in my own oppinion, I don't think that robots teaching will bring any fun, this is because as we all know before now that robots does not function outside what that has coded inside of it and also it does not understand human fellings, but teacher do, so as they have been coded in a particular way they can't be able to understand that this person learns better by seeing visuals and also another learns well by using audio, his own is that if it has been coded to show audio it will only concertrate on audio only that means that the person that understand better through visuals will be left behind.
And also that attention that is been given from teachers to students will no longer be there as they will not be able to understand when you are in the mood to have fun or not, so if AI are to represent teachers I promise you that it will be boring.
THANK YOU.........
Actually, I some how i don't agree with you because as from now some robots that are powdered by AI, has been able to have emotional feelings towards any activity doing or done.
So in conclusion what I trying to say in the future schools may or rather be taken over by AI because of it's progression to become more human like, which by having good communication skills and emotional skills and support towards other humans feeling's, school in the future can be able for some people at any age to whish to learn anything in school so from my own perspective I don't support your thought I hope I have been able to convince you that in the future of school robots powered by AI will be overtaking the the of school which probably will be better for the humankind. Thanks.
hello!
I think that school will exist in the future the only thing that will happen is 2 things either AI will teach the the kids or the kids would have a lot of new technology like holograms or floating items. By the way thank you for listening.
I agree with opinion B. Why I agree with opinion B is that even though technology can improve gratefully over the years, people still need hands-on learning on subjects that require skilled people in that profession to help them improve in an orderly manner. For example, if a student is failing math, a teacher or a tutor, can help them in the section that is causing them the most trouble. AI can't always help people get a hands-on learning experience. People will always need to study for a subject that is making them work harder than other subjects. Even though AI can help people improve a grade. Will people ever remember what the AI has taught them? People will always need a hands-on learning experience, not an experience from technology. That's why I agree with Opinion B "People will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too."
Yes. However, education and schools have been an essential part of society for centuries, and it is difficult to imagine a future without them. Education and learning are essential for personal and societal growth, and schools offer an environment that facilitates this process.
With advancements in technology and artificial intelligence, the way education is delivered is likely to change in the future. Virtual classrooms and online learning platforms are quickly becoming popular, and we may see more personalized learning experiences and flexible schedules become the norm.
However, it is highly unlikely that traditional schools will disappear entirely. Schools not only provide education but also promote socialization, teamwork, and critical thinking skills, which are essential for a successful and fulfilling life. In conclusion, while the format and delivery of education may change, schools will remain a valuable part of society.
I'm going with option c which says "School is about things that machines can't help with."
Firstly, School is the primary agent if socialisation , an avenue for students with different academic capability both the high scholars and the low achievers to come together and learn physically in the same environment. Human to human interactions or let me say teachers to students interaction filled with genuine care and affection for those students AI isn't programmed that way, it isn't programmed to feel sympathy or affection so therefore cannot give what it doesn't have unlike us humans that are capable of those feelings. I know that these feelings help them in teaching us taking their time to explain until we understand because they care for us and wish to see students that they taught successful in life.
Yes. However, education and schools have been an essential part of society for centuries, and it is difficult to imagine a future without them. Education and learning are essential for personal and societal growth, and schools offer an environment that facilitates this process.
With advancements in technology and artificial intelligence, the way education is delivered is likely to change in the future. Virtual classrooms and online learning platforms are quickly becoming popular, and we may see more personalized learning experiences and flexible schedules become the norm.
However, it is highly unlikely that traditional schools will disappear entirely. Schools not only provide education but also promote socialization, teamwork, and critical thinking skills, which are essential for a successful and fulfilling life. In conclusion, while the format and delivery of education may change, schools will remain a valuable part of society.
I know for a fact that the future holds much more than just AI so why should we restrict ourselves to Artificial intelligence a programme that we created? We need to know that the world is ever changing and we need to be well knowledgeable about everything around us and work on ways to incorporate AI into making yourself and people around you better. Give back to the community by processing and analysing data, THEIR NEEDS quickly and more efficiently. Also by going to areas with not that much information about AI and teaching them how to make/ use it so they won't be left behind in this ever changing world.
School is the first footboard of a child where he develops himself for the future. A child identifies his potential and develops his hobbies in school. In this era of advanced technology, online learning platforms have grabbed students' attention. After the pandemic, students have gotten into the habit of online learning. Even I've heard that some schools have started appointing robots as teachers who don't get angry at students and provide them with proper education. According to me, schools will and must exist in the future as teamwork, values, and other social skills are possessed by a child in the school itself. Despite the cast, gender, race, and economic status, a child makes friends in school. These kinds of qualities a child can only develop in school. A robot or computer can tell the meanings of these words but cannot put the child into it. Schools will remain in the future. Hence, I go with the option B. "People will always need to learn for themselves, even if machines are intelligent too."
I agree with B as it is important for humans to be able to work independently. If AI became too powerful then it could potentially take over the world instead of humans. This could start by people losing their jobs to machines. The world will be under threat to computers as AI will get more and more intelligent. Nothing would be unique as AI is programmed .
Hey there! While it's true that machines and AI can learn and process information, I believe there's still a lot of value in going to school. Let me explain why.
Firstly, school isn't just about acquiring knowledge. It's also about developing critical thinking skills, problem-solving abilities, and creativity. These are qualities that machines can't fully replicate. School helps us become well-rounded individuals and prepares us for various aspects of life beyond just information retrieval.
Secondly, school provides a social environment where we interact with teachers and peers. This interaction fosters collaboration, communication, and interpersonal skills. It's important to learn how to work with others, express ourselves, and develop relationships, which are crucial for success in many areas of life.
Furthermore, school offers a structured curriculum that covers a wide range of subjects. While machines can provide information, they might not have the ability to provide the same depth and breadth of knowledge that human educators can. School exposes us to various disciplines, helping us discover our interests and passions.
Lastly, school provides opportunities for extracurricular activities, such as sports, arts, and clubs. These activities help develop skills, build character, and provide a well-rounded education that goes beyond just academics.
So, while machines and AI can assist in learning, I believe that going to school offers a unique and invaluable experience that can't be replaced. It's a place where we not only gain knowledge but also develop important skills and relationships.
I agree because.... School serves as a hub for social interaction, cultivating not only academic knowledge but also essential life skills such as critical thinking and problem-solving. Additionally, it functions as a foundation for instilling discipline and values necessary for individuals to mature into responsible adults. Through this multifaceted approach, schools contribute to the comprehensive development of students, preparing them not only with knowledge but also the skills and values crucial for navigating the complexities of life.
I agree with statement B and C; I think that even though AI is getting smarter we should carry on learning because we can't always rely on AI. We still need to learn how to think by ourselves, how to read emotions, make friends and how to live in a group. Not all things produced by AI are true or real, for example images produced by MidJourney. We still need to critic or form opinions otherwise we are no better than robots.
Also if you think of the role of our teachers, the part where they share information might be replaceable by AI but the humour, the care, the understanding they have of how we learn, when we're happy or sad, what interests us outside of school... all of that is unique to humans.
Schools will need to teach us more about AI so we learn how to program and control it before it's too late, but it's also a place where creativity and imagination is encouraged and that is very good.
Thank you for reading
Hi loving_lychee. You have written a beautiful comment and I agree with you. As for option B, we don't always need to ask teachers for help. We can get many knowledge and information from reading a book. If we have any confusion, we can ask tech apps. But the main thing is that we should not always rely on robots or AI. It might make us lazy. All the work will be done by robots instead of us and we also can't make income if robots are doing the work.
As for number C, it might appear to us that we go to school just to gain some knowledge, pass an examination and get a good job in future but it doesn't end there. School helps us develop skills that are important to us like it helps to connect with people and develop communication skills. School also develops the habit of discipline and hard work. These are essential qualities for humans and I think the ones who developed AI also must have possessed these qualities which can only be learnt by attending school.
Thank you for your reply, witty_desert reading your reply has really opened my eyes and I agree that using AI to much can make us lazy because Last week when I was in school I told my teacher that although we shouldn't trust AI to much there is the fact that AI can really cut down on time, and this can be really useful because It both saves hours of time planning lessons but my teacher uses chatgpt to write stories that my class can edit.
Thank you for opening my eyes
yours sincerely
loving_lychee
I agree with opinion B because AI still needs humans to program it and if we don't go to school we won't know how to create and/or program it or build the robots AI resides in.